Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U.S. Army Medical Materiel Center – Korea

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No WP:42 sources in the article. I can find a few references in TWL but generally written by Army-affiliated people, destroying their independence. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 15:43, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and South Korea. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 15:43, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Appears to have been copied from a US Gov. source, as public domain text. But all I find are various Army sites that talk about the place, put out by the "PR department" of the Army. It doesn't have non-primary sourcing, but it's still reliable, I'm not sure how we handle this. We've always allowed PD text for the US Gov't to be copied... Oaktree b (talk) 15:46, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sources found are always on dvids, [1], which the military uses to publish their media, photos etc. Oaktree b (talk) 15:47, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I've pulled up various US Army wiki articles at random, to see how often they are only sourced to US Army or gov't websites. Most aren't and have RS in things not related to the army. I suppose in this case it should be deleted for a lack of non-primary sourcing. I can't find any news articles not published by dvids. Even in Gbooks or Scholar, it's all sourced to military publications. We'd require sourcing not from the US Gov't or Army/military, that I can't find... Oaktree b (talk) 15:52, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:24, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, can't find any non-US govt news sources about it in either Korean or English. toobigtokale (talk) 13:10, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete can find no evidence of SIGCOV in independent sources. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This article (same article also published in Yonhap) is all I can find and is definitely routine. ~ F4U (talk • they/it) 13:35, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]