User talk:MarioGom

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by .

Inquiry Regarding Recent Edit to Cyber Skills Center

Hi MarioGom,

I've seen that the Cyber Skills Center page was redirected on 7th December 2023 due to notability concerns (WP:ORGCRIT). Could you share which specific notability criteria were not met? If there were any discussions that led to this decision, links to those would be helpful for context.

Thanks for your help! Jeremywade10 (talk) 21:39, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jeremywade10: what WP:ORGCRIT requires is that the organization is subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. You have further explanation of how to apply this in the section just below that (WP:SIRS). Sources need to be independent. Interviews are not independent reporting. So for a source about the organization, you should discount any passage that is just direct or indirect quotes from the organization and consider only what's left of independent reporting. Also the coverage needs to be in-depth (WP:ORGDEPTH). Brief routine, coverage of the organization creation are not considered significant coverage. MarioGom (talk) 10:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red March 2024

Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301

Online events:

New: Alphabet run Q & R | Art+Feminism | Find Her

Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative)

Ankündigungen

Celebrate Women – All content gender gap events, in every language Wikipedia, in March 2024
Francophone Women★ Writers Fortnight 2024
Feminism and Folklore 2024 Writing Contest

Tip of the month:

When creating a new article, check various spellings, including birth name, married names
and pseudonyms, to be sure an article doesn't already exist.

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:J. Sai Deepak on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Foreign Secretary on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:1948 Palestine war on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Articles with Baidu Baike links

A tag has been placed on Category:Articles with Baidu Baike links indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:49, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration case request

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Promoting Iranian government POV in Wikipedia? and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 15:10, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MarioGom,

The Arbitration Committee has decided to procedurally remove the case request Promoting Iranian government POV in Wikipedia? as invalid. Details can be found at the bottom of Special:Permalink/1214583983 § Promoting Iranian government POV in Wikipedia?: Case request removed.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:19, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RFA2024 update: no longer accepting new proposals in phase I

Hey there! This is to let you know that phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship (RfA) review is now no longer accepting new proposals. Lots of proposals remain open for discussion, and the current round of review looks to be on a good track towards making significant progress towards improving RfA's structure and environment. I'd like to give my heartfelt thanks to everyone who has given us their idea for change to make RfA better, and the same to everyone who has given the necessary feedback to improve those ideas. The following proposals remain open for discussion:

Proposal 2, initiated by HouseBlaster, provides for the addition of a text box at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship reminding all editors of our policies and enforcement mechanisms around decorum.
Proposals 3 and 3b, initiated by Barkeep49 and Usedtobecool, respectively, provide for trials of discussion-only periods at RfA. The first would add three extra discussion-only days to the beginning, while the second would convert the first two days to discussion-only.
Proposal 5, initiated by SilkTork, provides for a trial of RfAs without threaded discussion in the voting sections.
Proposals 6c and 6d, initiated by BilledMammal, provide for allowing users to be selected as provisional admins for a limited time through various concrete selection criteria and smaller-scale vetting.
Proposal 7, initiated by Lee Vilenski, provides for the "General discussion" section being broken up with section headings.
Proposal 9b, initiated by Reaper Eternal, provides for the requirement that allegations of policy violation be substantiated with appropriate links to where the alleged misconduct occured.
Proposals 12c, 21, and 21b, initiated by City of Silver, Ritchie333, and HouseBlaster, respectively, provide for reducing the discretionary zone, which currently extends from 65% to 75%. The first would reduce it 65%–70%, the second would reduce it to 50%–66%, and the third would reduce it to 60%–70%.
Proposal 13, initiated by Novem Lingaue, provides for periodic, privately balloted admin elections.
Proposal 14, initiated by Kusma, provides for the creation of some minimum suffrage requirements to cast a vote.
Proposals 16 and 16c, initiated by Thebiguglyalien and Soni, respectively, provide for community-based admin desysop procedures. 16 would desysop where consensus is established in favor at the administrators' noticeboard; 16c would allow a petition to force reconfirmation.
Proposal 16e, initiated by BilledMammal, would extend the recall procedures of 16 to bureaucrats.
Proposal 17, initiated by SchroCat, provides for "on-call" admins and 'crats to monitor RfAs for decorum.
Proposal 18, initiated by theleekycauldron, provides for lowering the RfB target from 85% to 75%.
Proposal 24, initiated by SportingFlyer, provides for a more robust alternate version of the optional candidate poll.
Proposal 25, initiated by Femke, provides for the requirement that nominees be extended-confirmed in addition to their nominators.
Proposal 27, initiated by WereSpielChequers, provides for the creation of a training course for admin hopefuls, as well as periodic retraining to keep admins from drifting out of sync with community norms.
Proposal 28, initiated by HouseBlaster, tightens restrictions on multi-part questions.

To read proposals that were closed as unsuccessful, please see Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase I/Closed proposals. You are cordially invited once again to participate in the open discussions; when phase I ends, phase II will review the outcomes of trial proposals and refine the implementation details of other proposals. Another notification will be sent out when this phase begins, likely with the first successful close of a major proposal. Happy editing! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her), via:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration case request

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Promoting Iranian government POV in Wikipedia? and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, 182Line (talk) 08:31, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SPI

Hi there, in January you endorsed the SPI/Checkuser at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Banana Republic. I believe he is back, and it is not just me seeing issues. Johnuniq has had to protect the Template talk:Protection table because of the type of edit warring typical of these socks by the editor I reported at SPI a week ago. I know SPI is backlogged, but any chance you could take a look? Thanks. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 22:03, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I fully protected Template:Protection table due to a slow edit war. The editor concerned is clearly a returned user. Johnuniq (talk) 02:16, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Language and linguistics request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Bitcoin on a "Language and linguistics" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:31, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a mop reserved in your name

You are a remarkable editor in many ways. You would be a good administrator, in my opinion, and appear to be well qualified. You personify an administrator without tools and have gained my support already!

Maliner (talk) 08:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wait… aren't you already an admin? Or do I miss my userhighlighter too much. Zippybonzo | talk | contribs (they/them) 21:02, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1. Would support. Do you have any good articles or featured content? Would likely make your run smoother if you did. –Novem Linguae (talk) 01:52, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would happily support your RfA. – DreamRimmer (talk) 12:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind words! I'm not considering it at the moment. Maybe some time in the future ;-) MarioGom (talk) 15:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can't wait, comrade. — Usedtobecool ☎️ 15:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]