User talk:Sahajitbro

Sahajitbro, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Sahajitbro! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Deewana

This book may help you to add more information on the article. I suggest you using more sources from newspapers and magazines, and not from website, especially like India Forums (this is a online forum and unreliable) and iDiva (except if they are interviews). See here for further information. --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 06:58, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your assistance. But actually, I'm not getting access to the book. It would be great if you can kindly add the required and suitable information in reference to that book. Thank you. : ) Sahajitbro (talk) 07:02, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can create an account (for free) and then you will have an access. --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 07:24, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GAN

Do you have a plan to nominate Deewana for GA? I will try to expand it with Anupama Chopra's book I have given to you before. --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:39, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it'll be nice if you really nominate it for GA. Thanks in advance. :) Sahajitbro (talk) 05:45, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Deewana (1992 film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Deewana (1992 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ArcticSeeress -- ArcticSeeress (talk) 15:20, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Deewana (1992 film)

The article Deewana (1992 film) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Deewana (1992 film) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ArcticSeeress -- ArcticSeeress (talk) 19:42, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ChaalBaaz

Nice work on expanding ChaalBaaz. Wondering if you would be interested in expanding Hum (film)? DareshMohan (talk) 23:30, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Would try. Thank you. :) Sahajitbro (talk) 05:11, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Rang (1993 film)

The article Rang (1993 film) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Rang (1993 film) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Nineteen Ninety-Four guy -- Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 06:44, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I find no discussion in the talk page. Why is it so? Sahajitbro (talk) 13:20, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Divya Bharti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shola Aur Shabnam.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations \| March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Gargee Roychowdhury.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Gargee Roychowdhury.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a copyright violation and has no credible claim of fair use or permission. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 15:12, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Subhashree Ganguly still.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Subhashree Ganguly still.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 21:54, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Aparajita Auddy still.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Aparajita Auddy still.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 21:55, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Gargee Roychowdhury.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Gargee Roychowdhury.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 21:55, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Subashree Ganguly00.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Subashree Ganguly00.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a copyright violation and has no credible claim of fair use or permission. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Johnj1995 (talk) 05:04, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces (File) for repeated upload of copyrighted images.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Whpq (talk) 05:16, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zee Cine Awards

Their own website indicated that it had not yet happened. Primefac (talk) 15:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They haven't updated it yet. But search on google and you'll get it. Sahajitbro (talk) 04:03, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you !

		The Special Barnstar
		THANKS FOR CREATING THE ARTICLE 7th WBFJA Award BhikhariInformer (talk) 05:39, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hello, I'm Archer1234. I noticed that you recently removed content from Nithya Menen without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Archer1234 (t·c) 17:59, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]