Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gastrosexuality
Gastrosexuality
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Gastrosexuality (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Failed attempt at neologism from 2008, apparently part of a commercial promotion. Appears to have originated in the Daily Mail, which is not usable as a source. RS usage that I can find is one Irish Times mention. There's a HuffPost article that turns out to be a reblog of the Daily Mail piece. There's a Times article that admits it's an advertising feature. That's it. This was an article, then it was a redirect, then it was restored as an ill-sourced article. I'm pretty sure a single usage of an advertising promotional term is not sufficient for a Wikipedia article, and it would be a dicdef in any case. David Gerard (talk) 19:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 19:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete This article does not meet Wikipedia's standards for citation and a reliable source and isn't notable enough.Yakov-kobi (talk) 00:05, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sexuality and gender and Social science. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: A single, possibly promotional use wouldn't qualify for a Wikipedia article. It might be better suited for a dictionary definition. Waqar💬 18:35, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as per nomination, and all of the above. TH1980 (talk) 02:02, 30 June 2024 (UTC)