Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pierre-Loup Bouquet (2nd nomination)
Appearance
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Pierre-Loup Bouquet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable figure skater; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the national championships do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. Google search turns up nothing outside of wikis and scoring databases. Previous AFD received zero arguments in favor of keeping this article that cited any evidence of notability. Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:55, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Skating, and France. Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:55, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:28, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Fails WP:NSKATE but passes WP:SPORT with WP:SIGCOV in Le Dauphine and La Depeche. (And without these sources it would be a procedural keep under WP:2MONTHS.) Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:01, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- WP:2MONTHS is not an actual policy. Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:29, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- But it is a principle worth adhering to. AfD is crowded, and editors' time to do the WP:BEFORE searching necessary for meaningful AfD participation is limited; if something didn't get consensus the first time, let it breathe a bit before bringing it back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 23:04, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- WP:2MONTHS is not an actual policy. Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:29, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: With the two sources from Dclemens1971, this subject has the needed WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG. Passing WP:NSKATE isn't necessary for a figure skater to be notable. Let'srun (talk) 23:38, 5 July 2024 (UTC)