Jump to content

User talk:The Banner

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ToBeFree (talk | contribs) at 09:05, 7 July 2024 (→‎Distuberd by your actions on my updates / Belgrade Nikola Tesla Airport: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


User talk:The Banner/Airport vandal

I try to the best of my knowledge and belief to contribute to the small red block of the image


Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back.




My archives
Part 1: Old archives, organised per year.
Part 2: Current archives, organised per month



Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Distuberd by your actions on my updates / Belgrade Nikola Tesla Airport

I find it quite DISTURBING that you are: - removing current links (I've updated the page with relevant up to date links) - adding "independent" links which funnily enough come from 1 (one) web site only!? - consider a 3rd party web site to have more relevant information than the airline company itself - if the company announces a service on it's web page, why do we care about a 3rd party web site, which is relying on the airline information. And why is it just 1 site that you are prioritizing?

I am shocked, and honestly, quite disturbed by this fact. Algoritam1 (talk) 11:34, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not shocked or disturbed by the fact that you are afraid of independent sources. I have seen that too often already. But be advised that the removal of sources is seen as vandalism by a lot of people. Beside that: sources and source requests are not clutter, it is trying to make Wikipedia reliable and verifiable. The Banner talk 15:48, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As ALL the links you are posting lead to ONE web site ONLY, I am under the impression that you have INTEREST in it.
In case AN OFFICIAL SOURCE is used, it has move value than what you claim to be an independent source.
Pls. stop what you are doing, or you will be REPORTED for vandalizing the page. Algoritam1 (talk) 06:33, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Furtheremore, I have updated several dead links with actual links. For reason known only to you, you have removed those links, and vandalized with dead links.
For the record. Algoritam1 (talk) 06:34, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That exyuaviation-source is a working link. But you preferred to replace that independent source by a related source provided by the marketing department of Air Serbia. Do you work for/on behalf of the airline or the airport? The Banner talk 08:44, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:External_links
Enough said. Algoritam1 (talk) 16:40, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe you should start reading WP:V and WP:RS instead of making baseless claims. The Banner talk 16:42, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This user is adding IRRELEVANT links to the page, and is vandalizing pages in the process:
- 2, 3, 5, 10 years dead links. When adding new, up to date links, the user reverts to non existing content
- adding 1 (ONE) web site as a source. The user claims this to be an independent source, but there seem to be ULTERIOR motives behind this - it's the only guess I can make. Algoritam1 (talk) 07:19, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You have nothing more to offer than personal attacks and vandalism? Did you ever read WP;V and WP:RS? The Banner talk 08:21, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(from WP:AIV) Hi. Looking at their About page, we're talking about a self-published source by someone on the Internet on a Blogger blog. It is reasonable to argue that an airline's official website is a more reliable source for airline destinations than someone's Blogger blog. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:55, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:RS and WP:V are asking for third party sources, not the company website as source. Beside that, the editor claim that the links are dead, what is not the case. But I will see if the edit warring starts again, what was the reason of the prior block. The Banner talk 09:03, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is not always correct, and both pages use the wording "largely not acceptable" to refer to your currently preferred type of source. Regarding the edit warring, it seems you have contributed to it for no good reason. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:05, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 July 2024

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:The_Banner&oldid=1233108181"