Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Colonial Empires/Userbox/CEBASICBOX

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Joe Roe (talk | contribs) at 09:06, 8 July 2024 (→‎Wikipedia:WikiProject Colonial Empires/Userbox/CEBASICBOX: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Colonial Empires/Userbox/CEBASICBOX (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Colonialism was redirected and is no longer a project or task force. Gonnym (talk) 09:59, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

13:15, 26 June 2024Joe Roe talk contribs‎  60 bytes −3,268‎   Redirected page to Wikipedia:WikiProject History
User:Joe Roe, why did you do that?
I think the default action should be to redirect all subpages of Wikipedia:WikiProject Colonialism to Wikipedia:WikiProject Colonialism. That is, archive all subpages as redirects to the redirect. Is there a reason not to? SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:06, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There was a consensus to do so at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject History#Merge inactive history WikiProjects. Sorry, I forgot to add an edit summary. I've no objection to redirecting all the subpages. I retained some because the might be of historical interest and others because they have no incoming links anyway so it didn't seem worth the hassle. – Joe (talk) 11:18, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. By default, I think it’s better to preserve history of anything ever used, unless it should never have been created. However, if someone, especially someone from the WikiProject, has a rationale for deleting over archiving (history behind redirects), then I have no objection to deletion. I think wikiarchiology is a good thing to be allowed to happen, and that deletion requests should give at least lip service to why archiving is not a good idea. SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:24, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]