Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dacian fortress of Ponor

Dacian fortress of Ponor

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ridiculously short article that fails WP:GNG and WP:NPLACE. No hits of reliable sources on google books or search. No article in Romanian is a bad sign. -1ctinus📝🗨 16:56, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ro:Cetățile Ponorului is the Romanian-language article (or, at least, the only plausibly-notable topic of a similar name). Walsh90210 (talk) 17:00, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That may be a step towards salvaging the article, but the Romanian article also cites no sources, andseems to be about a cave rather than a fortress :( -1ctinus📝🗨 17:10, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the "cave"/"ruined fortress" difference is somewhat concerning; but for a micro-stub like this it is easily dismissed as confusion by the enwiki article creator. As far as rowiki sourcing, there are some websites in the article (like [1]); it might not be enough to demonstrate notability but is enough to verify that something exists. Walsh90210 (talk) 17:15, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]