Jump to content

User talk:Plorpy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Plorpy (talk | contribs) at 20:12, 14 July 2024 (→‎unblock: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Plorpy's talk page. All messages will be deleted upon reading.

Plorpy's talk page

Messages will be deleted when read. Plorpy (talk) 21:05, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Communication is required

Hey, Plorpy. I'm afraid communication isn't optional; you can read about that at WP:communication is required. Removing a message from your user talk doesn't make a concern go away, and an editor has expressed concern that you are continuing to make the same mistakes after there've been concerns expressed here. Please either come into the ANI section or respond here before editing again. Valereee (talk) 18:35, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Valereee hi valereee- the complainer was unable to provide a single example of a bad-faith or erroneous edit among the nearly 3000 contributions I have made. I reasonably assumed they were being vexatious in their posts to my talk page. From past experience the best way to deal with these sorts of people is to ignore them. the burden is on them to provide specific examples of any significant editing errors or other rule breaking on my part. all the best, Plorpy (talk) 20:06, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Valereee (talk) 19:26, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No objection to any other admin lifting this once this editor starts communicating. Valereee (talk) 19:28, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unblock

unblock|reason=the complainer was unable to provide a single example of a bad-faith or erroneous edit among the nearly 3000 contributions I have made. I reasonably assumed they were being vexatious in their posts to my talk page. From past experience the best way to deal with these sorts of people is to ignore them. the burden is on them to provide specific examples of any significant editing errors or other rule breaking on my part. all the best,re Plorpy (talk) 20:12, 14 July 2024 (UTC)}}[reply]