User talk:Trey

Archives

>Hello, Thank You For Leaving Me A Message. I Have Come Out of Retirement. Remember To Sign Your Posts!

Renamed!

I've renamed you.

We can't merge accounts so the way it works is that both accounts get renamed. User:TREYWiki was renamed to User:TREYWiki (usurped) and User:Ttttrrrreeeeyyyyyy was then renamed to User:TREYWiki. This means that your old account is now called User:TREYWiki and the TREYWiki account you made has been moved out of the way. I hope this makes sense! Secretlondon 12:11, 15 April 2007 (UTC) --TREYWiki 01:02, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Splash Lagoon Image

I don't know if you noticed this but the image on the Splash Lagoon article uses the licensing template {{logo}}. But, (how should I put this without being overly blunt), it's not a logo. If you need help finding better templates to use, let me know. There are a myriad number of image templates (one for almost every situation and even I'm still have trouble deciding which is best).
Dtbohrer^{talk•contribs} 17:12, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I wasn't really sure what to put. I thought it was kinda like a logo for splash, but if you'd like to choose a better one, that is OK and Id appreciate it --TREYWiki 01:08, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just give the location and/or how you came by this picture and that will narrow down the numeber of templates to chose from.
Dtbohrer^{talk•contribs} 01:33, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cut and paste comments

I think you got ahead of yourself with the comments regarding local news anchors. Every single one was endorsed with the exact same statement regarding KDKA anchors, even for those who never worked there.

Although I agree that most of the articles should be deleted, you really did not give a reason that was more than a WP:IDONTLIKEIT. If you're questioning their notability, as I would guess, then you would be better off citing WP:BIO and why you feel it doesn't meet that guideline. DarkAudit 04:00, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yeah, I got sick of writing it over and over when I was dealing with kd lvr. Is it agianst policy to do that? --TREYWiki 04:01, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's not really against policy, but it's a bad habit to get into. Especially when you weren't really giving a reason why the article in question should be deleted. DarkAudit 04:09, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, I wont do it anymore.--TREYWiki 21:54, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CSN

Please note, as stated in the header, that WP:CSN is not a vote. This means using buzzwords like support and bolding your opinion are unnecessary. Furthermore, as I noted in my comment at WP:CN#Disruption_by_User:Miaers, since numbers are not counted in determining consensus (only arguments), "endorse per User X" are unnecessary; User X already offered that argument. Instead, if someone disagreed with X, you might want to respond to the opposition, but otherwise such a comment is unnecessary. Thanks. Dmcdevit·t 08:40, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks. It was my first time at the community sanction noticeboard. --TREYWiki 15:21, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 18:45, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Glad to see you're back! - SVRTVDude ^(VT) 16:42, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]