User talk:Orangemonster2k1
Could I gently suggest
Hi, could I gently suggest that you don't post on Calton's talk page? It's obvious that your posts are unwelcome, and so could be seen as harassment. He's an experienced editor and doesn't need to be warned of the 3RR policy, so why not just stay away? Less stress for both of you. ElinorD (talk) 01:29, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Comment on one of the KD's user talk pages.
Probably the best Wiki apology I've ever seen, you owned up to what you did, and apologized for it without requiring anything of the other user (which may or may not have been reasonable). I'm impressed. KP Botany 01:57, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I was surprised for more than one reason that your apology was accepted, but sometimes that's what you get when you realize you were in the wrong and approach it solely from that perspective, rather than dealing with what anyone else did. It makes it easier at Wikipedia for everyone. You're a bigger man than I am, certainly, for being able to do that. ;) KP Botany 02:10, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
What I was suggesting with the Stoop!d Monkey deletion
Here's what I had in mind for the Stoop!d Monkey merge into List of Robot Chicken episodes. (I've removed the fair-use images for this talk page comment, since they aren't being used for critical commentary. Instead, I'm putting in a picture of a flour mill.)
| Screenshot | Title | Airdate | Episode # | Production Code |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
"Junk in the Trunk" | February 20, 2005 | 1 | 2 |
|
Rachael Leigh Cook smashes more than eggs in her latest This is Your Brain on Drugs public service announcement. Optimus Prime, leader of the Autobots, falls prey to prostate cancer. The outcome is never in doubt during "World's Most One-Sided Fistfights Caught on Film." Outtakes from The Dukes of Hazzard, The X-Files, Battlestar Galactica and more come to light in "Bloopers." | ||||
|
Stoop!d Monkey logo: He is about to hit his tail with a hammer. | ||||
|
|
"Nutcracker Sweet" | February 27, 2005 | 2 | 5 |
|
Voltron engages in an old-school dance-off in "You Got Robo-Served." The secret lives of nature's most fascinating beasts are exposed in "Secrets of the Animal Kingdom." Testicles are terrorized in "Ode to the Nut Shot." Walt Disney's severed head with its giant robotic spider-body attacks Cuba. | ||||
|
Stoop!d Monkey logo: He is smoking an entire pack of cigarettes in his mouth. | ||||
|
|
"Gold Dust Gasoline" | March 6, 2005 | 3 | 6 |
|
The animals Noah left behind try to survive the flood in their very own ark. Enjoy instant nostalgia with "That '00s Show." Mrs. McNally's third-graders produce an animated abomination in "The Best Cowboy." The world's most famous cars, from KITT to the the General Lee and even Mario karts, race against each other in "3 Fast 3 Furious." | ||||
|
Stoop!d Monkey logo: He is about to whack a beehive with a stick. | ||||
That was what I had in mind. That way, we don't have to keep a separate list that runs parallel to the main list of episodes. --Elkman (Elkspeak) 04:12, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
No problem
Yeah...I've done the same thing with info-boxes. Totally fouled up WMMO in Orlando by using the copy and paste method from WFXH-FM!!! Oh well, stuff happens. Thanks for helping out...one of these days I want to finish the Southside VA radio pages...one of these days:) Radio-x 05:27, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Stoopid Monkey Logos
Hi. I've gone back over the AfD, and my opinion was in relation to the base content itself in the context of the original nomination. My delete vote was purely in the context that notability was not established for the subject of the article and therefore per policy needed to be deleted. However, as the content had obviously been cleaned up it was a consensus of keep. The issue of the logos list as far as I can see is a separate issue to the AfD discussion. The main point being contested by other editors in relation to the logos is Reliable sources and what wikipedia is not. Having reviewed the article history, I am of the opinion that the the list of logos at issue here is not of encyclopaedic merit and adds no value to the article on the subject whatsoever. Additionally, the referenced source used for the content is deemed to be self-published research and threfore does not meet the criteria set down in the Reliable sources polocy. Therefore, the content in dispute can and should be easily removed in accordance with relevant policy. In regards to the blocking you received, both you and Calton both engaged in edit warring that was deemed to be in breach of the three revert rule. I have taken a look at the reasons for the block, and I would concur that the blocking admin Dmcdevit (A longtime WP user and current Bureaucrat) was legitimate and justified. In terms of requesting a block on the page, it's unlikely to be granted either full or semi-protection as there has not been enough activity to justify it. Regrettably, after reviewing this matter I have seen fit to file 3RR reports against the both of you for your actions in relation to this article in the preceding 24hrs. I would strongly encourage you to use this time to step back and have a good think about the matter before taking any further action. Thewinchester (talk) 06:16, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
i disagree. i think having it categorized is a good idea, because aren't other things categorized with lists and the like? but if this carlton person (i read the history page; yipes) has issues with it then maybe the above suggestion of incorporating the logos into the episode guide might be better. that good? Bouncehoper 20:44, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Is there a reason...
... for adding 180kb of information to my talk page? I'm just wondering. --FateClub 15:38, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, is there a reason for this edit? Don't know how FateClub's message to you was an "oy vey" inducing message, it seems like a legit question to me, one that I have myself as well. Metros232 15:55, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- It's all fine. I was wondering what had happened. I thought... Have I been so long that I have missed a couple of dozen messages? I'm glad it's all settled. Good day! --FateClub 17:19, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Cumberland, Maryland Radio Chart
You made some changes to the radio chart on the Cumberland, Maryland page. This messed things up BIG time. I figured you didn't mean to do this, so no worries. But, there are sometimes, especially with charts, that blank areas are a good thing and should be left alone. If you have questions with charts and whatnot, please let me know and I will be glad to help. - SVRTVDude (VT) 03:21, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Hi SVRTVDude, I'm very sorry about that. I'll have look at getting my bot to leave that sort of thing alone in future. Cheers, CmdrObot 19:55, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Corbin
Telling someone to "look it up" is right out. We are not here to make people look things up; if you cannot cite it well, it does not go in. --Golbez 06:21, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- I'm pulling back from the greater aspect and only looking at the petty edit war. I have nothing to do with the block that is presently on you. --Golbez 06:29, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Orangemonster2k1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Not as if it matters, but this block is nothing more than a continuation of the problems that [[User:Calton]] makes for everyone. He doesn't get his way, he reports you, you get blocked. I have done nothing wrong and have broken ONLY 3RR which is a 24hour block. My previous actions, which had NOTHING to do with [[User:Calton]] should NOT be a stepping stone for this block. I ask that this block be knocked down to 24hours or removed outright, as this is petty whining from [[User:Calton]]. But since a block has been removed from anyone on Wikipedia since the Mayflower landed, I have wasted my "breath". - [[User:Orangemonster2k1|SVRTVDude]] <sup>([[User_talk:Orangemonster2k1|V]][[Special:Contributions/Orangemonster2k1|T]])</sup> 08:48, 10 May 2007 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=Not as if it matters, but this block is nothing more than a continuation of the problems that [[User:Calton]] makes for everyone. He doesn't get his way, he reports you, you get blocked. I have done nothing wrong and have broken ONLY 3RR which is a 24hour block. My previous actions, which had NOTHING to do with [[User:Calton]] should NOT be a stepping stone for this block. I ask that this block be knocked down to 24hours or removed outright, as this is petty whining from [[User:Calton]]. But since a block has been removed from anyone on Wikipedia since the Mayflower landed, I have wasted my "breath". - [[User:Orangemonster2k1|SVRTVDude]] <sup>([[User_talk:Orangemonster2k1|V]][[Special:Contributions/Orangemonster2k1|T]])</sup> 08:48, 10 May 2007 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=Not as if it matters, but this block is nothing more than a continuation of the problems that [[User:Calton]] makes for everyone. He doesn't get his way, he reports you, you get blocked. I have done nothing wrong and have broken ONLY 3RR which is a 24hour block. My previous actions, which had NOTHING to do with [[User:Calton]] should NOT be a stepping stone for this block. I ask that this block be knocked down to 24hours or removed outright, as this is petty whining from [[User:Calton]]. But since a block has been removed from anyone on Wikipedia since the Mayflower landed, I have wasted my "breath". - [[User:Orangemonster2k1|SVRTVDude]] <sup>([[User_talk:Orangemonster2k1|V]][[Special:Contributions/Orangemonster2k1|T]])</sup> 08:48, 10 May 2007 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}