User talk:GordonWatts

It's not current

Your complaint is not current - it was flushed. So this IS the right place. --Fredrick day 19:32, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Falso. It was not my complaint; It was Calton's complaint. Take your discussion to thye proper forum.--GordonWatts 19:41, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I have blocked you for disrupting Wikipedia to make a point. Posted to WP:AN for review. As far as I can tell you are doing nothign to repay the incredible wastage of time you inflict on the Wikipedia community. Guy (Help!) 20:14, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding [1], you have a conflict of interest: Step aside. (PS: I am not trying to "make" a point. I am trying to enforce policy.)--GordonWatts 20:15, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree there could be the perception of a conflict of interest here, so I have undone JzG's block. However I see no evidence at all that you're here to contribute usefully to the project, rather it looks like your goal is to waste our time, so I have blocked you from editing indefinitely. Friday (talk) 20:19, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was trying to contribute when Bish and Nandesuka began vandalizing my pages. When I realized they were not to blame, I asked myself "Why are they acting this way," and I reaslised that JzG slandered me and made false accusations that he had concensus when, even after Guy repeatedly beat a dead horse --and let people vote multiple times, he could not even get 50% to support any one sanction. So, since he violated "concensus" policy, I saw violation. Also, Guy used inappropriate language on his page, much worse than anything I have ever done, so I sought community action against him there too. Yes, maybe I too have a conflict of interest, but, as the victim, my right to bring action outweighs any COI concerns. However, if my only "crime" was in bringing a community action against him, you are unjustified in taking action. If you have a case, state it in the community page. But to remove my community action is violating Jimbo's orders: "Jimbo has said that "7. Anyone with a complaint should be treated with the utmost respect and dignity," so I would hope that no one wises to punish me for brining this valid complaint." This is not right.--GordonWatts 20:24, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to have mistaken Wikipedia for your own personal website. It's not, sorry. Friday (talk) 20:27, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

True, but this does not address my pint above. your post is illogical. I have tried to be productive since my return, but the vandalism has forced me to bring charges against the admin who misled Bish and Nande and others. Their continued vandalism could not be ignored, so I had no other choice BUT to bring a community action. It is not only my right, but it was my obligation, and it was the only logical manner in which to address the vandalism. Again, your statement was true, but you still did not address my concern.--GordonWatts 20:32, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]