Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Chidiac

Anthony Chidiac

I'm not convinced this person is notable. The article cites a few newspaper clippings that mention his name as the owner of a business. The bulk of the article is unsourced, probably self-biographical. Weregerbil 17:09, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Löschen No opinion on notability, looks borderline, but the present article is blatantly promotional in tone. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:16, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. The article might be an autobiography or OR. Dare I say sockpuppetry? Bearian 02:19, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article, like wikipedia, is a work in progress made by people who wanted to highligh his cause. I'm sure over time the content will be improved as others get to edit more into it. More media and articles about this person will follow when he gets to edit it himself. 10:20, 19 July 2007 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 60.241.91.14 (talk • contribs).
Delete - Promotional. Eyu100^{(t|fr|Version 1.0 Editorial Team)} 04:14, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hi There. I am the person being written about. I've been made aware of its inclusion in Wikipedia, looked at it, toning it down and taking a few things out that I am uncomfortable with. Please do not delete, work in progress.Achidiac
Keep - more information coming from industry peers, including content, news reports on TV, etc. Awaiting clearance for addition of further content. Definitely a person worth noting as a pioneer heralding change in the global entertainment industry.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by T3Smile (talk • contribs).
Update - this is still a work in progress aimed at highlighting this notable person. As I am new here, my studies over the next few months will complete this page as well as fill-in others as there are a lot of links to this guy that I need to verify before adding. Not an autobiography (I am female), just a great guy who did some big things to converge technology in the 90's and early 2000's.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by T3Smile (talk • contribs).

Sorry, but must people be so rude as to ignore comments here I'm making? Doesn't help anybody, especially me by just saying "promotional" and certainly is not an autobiography. If you want to add a comment like this, please show me where it is promotional and I'll fix it. Some people might have to read wiki guidelines with regards to new people. sheesh.--T3Smile 14:13, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment There hasn't been that much activity in this discussion since your last posts. In fact, I think I'm the only user to have made an edit after you. The promotional delete was accidentally deleted from the discussion before you posted your comments (this should be reflected by the timestamp and the history). It would probably be more correct to move the promotional delete comment up where it was before it was deleted. I will do that with this edit... I think it should be where it belongs. I think. -- Ben 14:22, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. If you search in Google, "Anthony Chidiac" seems to be an american gynecologist that had a traffic accident. Besides this, that seems to show non-notability, the article is too promotional and biographical (you can promote someone with his biography... that's absolutely possible!). E.g.: Why is there a photo of Chidiac's parents??? --Neigel von Teighen 14:27, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your thoughts and research Neigel. I had that problem with google too - try "anthony chidiac microsoft", or go to page 2 of your search. As mentioned in article, subject ordered the removal of all media pertaining to him to ensure his privacy after media circus surrounding Bill Gates Gig. Will delete reference to chidiac's parents. Anthony Chidiac Gyno article refers to a wrongly detained individual that made news due to circumstances. Not the same "Anthony Chidiac" - Gyno is in Florida, this guy is in Australia. Realise its possible to promote subject but not intended. Documenting notary person in history is my aim, however I never wrote for an encyclopedia before. When you mention "promotional" is it because I added links to other wiki sites? Need further clarity over how its deemed promotional - give examples. Again, thanks for your time and trouble. --T3Smile 14:48, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]