Jump to content

User talk:SineBot

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 202.164.134.254 (talk) at 16:57, 16 February 2008 (→‎Crush). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

STOP
This is not a human

You are attempting to contact SineBot, which is an automated program (i.e., a "robot" or "bot").

If you have a bug to report, do not post it here, instead:

Thanks a million. :)


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Kommentar
  1. Why does SineBot keep signing stuff I've already signed?
    All comments should have a signature that includes both a link to your user page (slakr) and a datestamp (05:12, 20 August 2007 (UTC)) (per signatures - internal links). This is most easily generated by placing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your contributions, which makes something like "slakr 05:12, 20 August 2007 (UTC)". If you're still having problems after trying that, post a message to slakr.[reply]
  2. I do sign using ~~~~, but the result includes my username as plain text, not as a link.
    You have probably changed the format of your signature. Go to "my preferences", then the "User profile" tab, and check the "Signature" field and the "Treat the above as wiki markup" checkbox. If "Treat the above as wiki markup" is checked, then the "Signature" field should contain wikicode, including something like [[User:Your Username|Your Username]]. If "Treat the above as wiki markup" is unchecked, then the "Signature" field should not contain wikicode.
  3. I don't want my comments signed by SineBot. How do I get it to ignore me or my talk page?
    Please use one of the opt-out methods listed on its user page.
  4. SineBot forgot to sign something it should have signed.
    Usually this happens because the bot isn't sure if it really should sign something, so it defaults to not signing it (e.g., in cases of complex edits). It does this to avoid being annoying. Other times, a comment might be made when the bot is down for maintenance, so the bot simply never sees it.
  5. SineBot signed something that it genuinely should not have signed.
    Please let slakr know-- especially if you think it's not a one-time thing.


 

 

 

Crush

I think this Bot has a crush on me. It keeps IMing me. Master Redyva ♠

I don't think bots have feelings...--69.234.214.46 (talk) 21:23, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nonsense! SineBot has feelings. It's stoic most of the time, but occasionally cracks a joke over coffee and a donut. :P --slakr\ talk / 13:15, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay...does this robot have romantic feelings?--69.234.200.106 (talk) 16:14, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Are you saying that bots don't have feelings? Outrage! They have feelings too, you know! миражinred (speak, my child...) 21:31, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, fine. Bots do have feelings. But they do not have the sexual desires that can lead to a crush. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.234.179.40 (talk) 21:20, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wrongo - they do. Haven't you ever seen that Bugs Bunny short where Elmer Fudd hires a robot to kill Bugs? Wilhelmina Will (talk) 21:30, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No. Besides, that's just a cartoon. --69.234.179.40 (talk) 22:26, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No it's not. The Looney Tunes all exist in other dimensions of our universe; it repeats itself from different perspectives in each galaxy. This means that the characters of South Park, the Simpsons, Futurama, King of the Hill, and Family Guy, and all the other shows we watch on television exist somewhere else. We just have yet to make physical contact with them. It will be done soon, and all those alternate worlds will be explored, and they will explore ours, and I'll finally see him - Ohh! It will be wonderful, when the day comes! Do you not agree? Wilhelmina Will (talk) 23:05, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Where did you get that idea? If we're an accident caused by a Big Bang, it's highly improbable that a universe should be created where creatures can exist, much less more. If we're created by God, why would he care so much about this universe if he has so many others? Besides, I don't think we'll get to those alternate world. First off, we'd need a ship faster than the speed of light, otherwise it'll be years before we reach the nearest solar system. Second, look at politics. There's a lot of tension in the world, our money will be spent on wars instead of space exploration. In fact, this may lead to a nuclear holocaust, and all our technology will be destroyed as a result. Finally, will it really be so wonderful when we get there? Maybe they'll be having a nuclear holocaust and their planet won't be a fun place to visit. --69.234.198.52 (talk) 21:54, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sinebot does not have a crush on you. I happen to know for a fact that she is already in a long term relationship with the office stapling machine. Sinebot was given this job to stop her causing trouble with Jimbo Wales' chequebook. And you can't get me with WP:BIO for revealing all this as I am not writing about a living person. Sinebot, please sign on the dotted line ......................................... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spinningspark (talk • contribs) 14:58, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Give me a break. I don't think Bots can be attracted to anything, and if they can, a relationship between a stapler and a bot would be bestiality, right? At any rate, I don't think there are genetic similarities enough for them to produce offspring. I think those staples are a result of parthenogenesis.--69.234.178.247 (talk) 17:18, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for the valuable suggestions. --202.164.134.254 (talk) 16:57, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unsigned Comments on Talk Pages

There are currently unsigned comments on Talk: Disaster!: A Major Motion Picture Ride...Starring You! and Talk: The Funtastic World of Hanna-Barbera (ride). Just letting you know so you could sign them.--72.91.191.67 (talk) 00:10, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--81.156.194.211 (talk) 00:36, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Will you be my unvalentine?

I heart you sinebot!--Woland (talk) 22:27, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Valentine's Day!

User:Wilhelmina Will has wished you a happy Valentine's day, and good luck in love and friendship!

A short/sweet little message, which I hope has made your day better! Happy Valentine's Day!!! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 03:06, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page vandalism problem - perhaps a delay?

SineBot makes it harder to roll back talk-page vandalism in the form of inappropriate material with no signature. Because SineBot makes an intervening edit, it is not possible to simply use the rollback button on the vandalism (meaning editors dealing with a stream of talk page vandals must take time-consuming extra steps). Perhaps you could increase the delay before SineBot tags a signature (especially if the comment is from an IP)? Cheers! bd2412 T 05:08, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SineBot&oldid=191878599"