User talk:Soccermeko

Hello, Soccermeko! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 16:33, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Welcome To My Talk Page

Questions = if you have a question, title your comment "question"
Complaints = please name your title complaints
Pictures = if you have a problem about pictures, title the subject the name of the picture
Unsigned Signatures = unsigned signature will be deleted
Deleting my things = if you deleted my thing, then you will be report no matter who you are

Userpage

I saw you blanked your userpage. Do you want to have it deleted? In that case, you can stick {{db-g7}} to it and someone will deleted it. Punkmorten 18:55, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Article Recreation

Unlike the other mixtapes, Speak My Mind (album) cites some sources - although it's not that much different when it was deleted here. It might get deleted again. Anyway, the reason mixtapes generally aren't notable is because they're just track lists and not much can be said about them. You can go to deletion review if you want it restored. I hope all of this doesn't discourage you from editing or anything. Spellcast (talk) 07:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

InDepenDance Day

Why does this page need to be protected? Please see WP:Protect for reasons why we protect pages. Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 07:02, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When you recreate a page, you have to address the concerns for it being deleted. The review site doesn't actually have a review. Also, 2 of the 3 singles aren't from the tape. You have to cite sources to show it's received significant coverage in reliable sources. See the Dedication 2 mixtape for example, that has several reviews and info. If you want to recreate it, you have to take it to deletion review. Continually recreating it like that will lead to a block. Spellcast (talk) 08:09, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Nicole Wray

"I'm Lookin'", "Borrowed Time", and "Dear Father" are way more of contemporary R&B, and Nicole's overall music is far from being as soulful and funky as Curtis Mayfield's or Marvin Gaye's, so please stop retrieving inaccurate genres. Also, genres should not be capitalised. Thank you. Funk Junkie (talk) 19:09, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nachricht

I've replied to your message on Talk:InDepenDance Day above. Also, see WP:NPA - threats like these aren't acceptable, thanks. Spellcast (talk) 21:42, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

InDepenDance Day

Please recreate so i can fix. Soccermeko (talk) 00:58, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will restore it to your user space. Please improve it there and do NOT move it to mainspace until an administrator has approved it. It will be at: User:Soccermeko/InDepenDance Day. Please familiarize yourself with the editor concerns as described at: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole Wray Starring in InDepenDance Day; Vol.1 The Takeover. JERRY ^talk _contribs 04:45, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have editted it. please tell others Soccermeko (talk) 22:02, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I took a look at it, and marked several maintenance concerns. Some of the marks are invisible comments; (can only be viewed in edit mode). You may want to address these concerns. JERRY ^talk _contribs 00:11, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stand Up (Nicole Wray song)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Stand Up (Nicole Wray song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Stand Up (Nicole Wray song). Victao lopes (talk) 22:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Nicole Wray's fourth studio album

An article that you have been involved in editing, Nicole Wray's fourth studio album, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole Wray's fourth studio album. Thank you. Victao lopes (talk) 23:51, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Bella Mafia (Mocha album)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Bella Mafia (Mocha album), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bella Mafia (Mocha album). Thank you. Mdsummermsw (talk) 15:10, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Soccermeko for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.Template:Do not delete Mdsummermsw (talk) 15:18, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

InDepenDance Day

how this now. User:Soccermeko/InDepenDance Day Soccermeko (talk) 16:02, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added my comments to the page in red. JERRY ^talk _contribs 16:19, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your message

Hi Meko, I can't nominate you for adminship considering you've just violated the three revert rule and when there is a current sockpuppetry case against you. If those issues get sorted out, you could try in a few months, thanks. Spellcast (talk) 20:26, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Nicole Wray discography

I'm sorry, I didn't realise I protected the wrong version. To request another admin make an edit to a protected page, place {{editprotected}} on the article's talk page. --Geniac (talk) 00:47, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, according to the protection log for the talk page, it is not nor has ever been protected from editing. --Geniac (talk) 00:01, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Working on Wikipedia

Hello. I've left you a welcome template above that explains how Wikipedia works. Messages here on your talk page are an important means of working together and should not be discouraged. An inability to work with others here could result temporary blocks or even a permanantban, as Wikipedia operates by concensus. The above welcome message contains many useful links for you. And as a gesture of good will, see the message below. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 16:33, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- CobaltBlueTony™ _talk has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Editing as an IP whilst blocked

Please do not edit using IP addresses to evade your block and continue edit-warring on topics related to Nicole Wray as you did here. You have been blocked for a week already for abusing sock puppet accounts. If you continue in this manner, your block will be extended. --Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 22:03, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mocha (rapper)

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Mocha (rapper), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 11:00, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. -- lucasbfr ^talk 16:45, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Mocha (rapper)

I have nominated Mocha (rapper), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mocha (rapper). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 17:17, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Mocha (rapper)

Template:Mocha (rapper) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Cloudz679 (talk) 07:55, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Soccermeko (2nd nomination) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.Template:Do not delete Cloudz679 (talk) 19:20, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requesing Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Soccermeko (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Alright this has gone far enough. The sockpuppet with me is JosephP89. But I still would like to request being unblock. I promise not to create another sockpuppet again. But all the other users had nothing to do with it. They just tried to be a end to you all putting false information about Nicole Wray. But if you unblock, I will try to make everything write and back to normal.

Decline reason:

I agree, it has gone far enough. You have attempted to edit via numerous anonymous IP addresses and numerous alternate accounts since being blocked. I see no evidence that you have been reformed recently. If you stay away from editing at ALL for some time, you may have a case that you are reformed. However, I see no evidence of that yet, given the recency of these sockpuppet problems. — Jayron32.talk.contribs 23:29, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This probably will need to go through ANI, I let an other admin decide. -- lucasbfr ^talk 21:51, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever, i really don't care rather you have information of not, i told you the truth and it does not matter because me and other users already spreaded the truth across about Wikipedia being a false information site. So rather you block or unblock , whats done is done. Soccermeko (talk) 23:53, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proof

and to prove that we are different users we all have different emails and just became we colloborated on the same thing does not make us the same people. if that not proof than there is no hope for to prove anything. Soccermeko (talk) 00:07, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I can go to hotmail right now and sign up for a few different addresses. You've proven nothing. Metros (talk) 00:10, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Soccermeko is proof enough... --Jayron32.talk.contribs 00:11, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, i don't care rather you believe or not. I told you the truth and the should enough for. And if you don't believe that then, you have violated Me, My Friends, Nicole Wray, and her music. Soccermeko (talk) 00:37, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]