User talk:Coredesat

This is the talk page for leaving messages for User:Coredesat.

Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~). Place comments that start a new topic at the bottom of the page and give them a descriptive header. I will usually reply on your talk page unless there's a need for me to reply here.

If you're new to Wikipedia, check out Wikipedia:Introduction and frequently asked questions.

Timestamped sections older than 5 days are archived to User talk:Coredesat/Archive 16 by MiszaBot III. New archives are added when the current archive reaches 50 KB.

Talk page guidelines

Please respect etiquette and assume good faith. Also be nice and remain civil.

My user talk archives
1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8
9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16
WPTC Newsletters

WP:METEO Active members

User:Juliancolton/Active

Hi

Ѕandahl has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

DC Meetup on May 17th

Your help is needed in planning Wikipedia:Meetup/DC 4! Any comments or suggestions you have are greatly appreciated. The Placebo Effect (talk) 18:52, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My request for bureaucratship

Dear Coredesat, thank you for taking part in my RfB. As you may know, it was not passed by bureaucrats.
I would, however, like to thank you for taking the time to voice your support, despite concerns cited by the opposition. Although RfA/B isn't really about a person, but more about the community, I was deeply touched and honoured by the outpouring of support and interest in the discussion. I can only hope that you don't feel your opinion was not considered enough - bureaucrats have to give everyone's thoughts weight.
I also hope that the results of this RfB lead to some change in the way we approach RfBs, and some thought about whether long-entrenched standards are a good thing in our growing and increasingly heterogenous community.
I was a little miserable after the results came out, so I'm going to spread the love via dancing hippos. As you do. :)
I remain eager to serve you as an administrator and as an editor. If at any point you see something problematic in my actions, please do not hesitate to call me out. ~ Riana ⁂ 13:41, 11 March 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Agni in Vamei's article

I notice you removed the mention of Agni in Vamei's article. That is probably the best course of action for now, given that we don't have the IMD data, and the JTWC is unreliable/unofficial. Just to let you know, I emailed the IMD, and they said an online version of the best track would be available in two months (1877-2006), though they didn't say whether it would have a subscription or not. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 14:50, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical Depression 11F

I noticed you recently removed content under 11F, stating that the extra information there was as it was extratropical. However, the information as "Depression 11F" was released under 20036.txt, the Tropical Disturbance Summary.[1] With this information, is it safe to say it wasn't completely extratropical yet? -- RattleMan 10:15, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]