Jump to content

User talk:Soccermeko

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Soccermeko (talk | contribs) at 00:12, 9 April 2008. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hello, Soccermeko! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 16:33, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Welcome To My Talk Page

  • Questions = if you have a question, title your comment "question"
  • Complaints = please name your title complaints
  • Pictures = if you have a problem about pictures, title the subject the name of the picture
  • Unsigned Signatures = unsigned signature will be deleted
  • Deleting my things = if you deleted my thing, then you will be report no matter who you are


Userpage

I saw you blanked your userpage. Do you want to have it deleted? In that case, you can stick {{db-g7}} to it and someone will deleted it. Punkmorten 18:55, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Re: Article Recreation

Unlike the other mixtapes, Speak My Mind (album) cites some sources - although it's not that much different when it was deleted here. It might get deleted again. Anyway, the reason mixtapes generally aren't notable is because they're just track lists and not much can be said about them. You can go to deletion review if you want it restored. I hope all of this doesn't discourage you from editing or anything. Spellcast (talk) 07:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


InDepenDance Day

Why does this page need to be protected? Please see WP:Protect for reasons why we protect pages. Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 07:02, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When you recreate a page, you have to address the concerns for it being deleted. The review site doesn't actually have a review. Also, 2 of the 3 singles aren't from the tape. You have to cite sources to show it's received significant coverage in reliable sources. See the Dedication 2 mixtape for example, that has several reviews and info. If you want to recreate it, you have to take it to deletion review. Continually recreating it like that will lead to a block. Spellcast (talk) 08:09, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Nicole Wray

"I'm Lookin'", "Borrowed Time", and "Dear Father" are way more of contemporary R&B, and Nicole's overall music is far from being as soulful and funky as Curtis Mayfield's or Marvin Gaye's, so please stop retrieving inaccurate genres. Also, genres should not be capitalised. Thank you. Funk Junkie (talk) 19:09, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Nachricht

I've replied to your message on Talk:InDepenDance Day above. Also, see WP:NPA - threats like these aren't acceptable, thanks. Spellcast (talk) 21:42, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

InDepenDance Day

Please recreate so i can fix. Soccermeko (talk) 00:58, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will restore it to your user space. Please improve it there and do NOT move it to mainspace until an administrator has approved it. It will be at: User:Soccermeko/InDepenDance Day. Please familiarize yourself with the editor concerns as described at: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole Wray Starring in InDepenDance Day; Vol.1 The Takeover. JERRY talk contribs 04:45, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have editted it. please tell others Soccermeko (talk) 22:02, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I took a look at it, and marked several maintenance concerns. Some of the marks are invisible comments; (can only be viewed in edit mode). You may want to address these concerns. JERRY talk contribs 00:11, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Stand Up (Nicole Wray song)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Stand Up (Nicole Wray song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Stand Up (Nicole Wray song). Victao lopes (talk) 22:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Nicole Wray's fourth studio album

An article that you have been involved in editing, Nicole Wray's fourth studio album, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole Wray's fourth studio album. Thank you. Victao lopes (talk) 23:51, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Mocha (rapper)

Template:Mocha (rapper) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Cloudz679 (talk) 07:55, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Soccermeko (2nd nomination) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.Template:Do not delete Cloudz679 (talk) 19:20, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requesing Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Soccermeko (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Alright this has gone far enough. The sockpuppet with me is JosephP89. But I still would like to request being unblock. I promise not to create another sockpuppet again. But all the other users had nothing to do with it. They just tried to be a end to you all putting false information about Nicole Wray. But if you unblock, I will try to make everything write and back to normal.

Decline reason:

I agree, it has gone far enough. You have attempted to edit via numerous anonymous IP addresses and numerous alternate accounts since being blocked. I see no evidence that you have been reformed recently. If you stay away from editing at ALL for some time, you may have a case that you are reformed. However, I see no evidence of that yet, given the recency of these sockpuppet problems. — Jayron32.talk.contribs 23:29, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This probably will need to go through ANI, I let an other admin decide. -- lucasbfr talk 21:51, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Whatever, i really don't care rather you have information of not, i told you the truth and it does not matter because me and other users already spreaded the truth across about Wikipedia being a false information site. So rather you block or unblock , whats done is done. Soccermeko (talk) 23:53, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proof

and to prove that we are different users we all have different emails and just became we colloborated on the same thing does not make us the same people. if that not proof than there is no hope for to prove anything. Soccermeko (talk) 00:07, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I can go to hotmail right now and sign up for a few different addresses. You've proven nothing. Metros (talk) 00:10, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Soccermeko is proof enough... --Jayron32.talk.contribs 00:11, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, i don't care rather you believe or not. I told you the truth and the should enough for you. And if you don't believe that then, you have violated Me, My Friends, Nicole Wray, and her music. Soccermeko (talk) 00:37, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Mocha discography

I have nominated Mocha discography, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mocha discography. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Cloudz679 (talk) 11:29, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Nicole I Can't See Maxi.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Nicole I Can't See Maxi.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:28, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Nicole Wray

An editor has nominated Nicole Wray, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole Wray and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 15:00, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Yolanda Johnson

An editor has nominated Yolanda Johnson, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yolanda Johnson and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 16:00, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can edit

they say you can edit. but they need to unblock Deenharp, Editor 126, and Leofan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.129.70.115 (talk) 00:01, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Soccermeko (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't care. No one care about Wikipedia. You try to contribute but they reply by adding false information and lies. And if the block isn't undone then it really would be the crappess site ever made. Because you got stupid users who think they know everything. Soccermeko (talk) 00:08, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I don't care. No one care about Wikipedia. You try to contribute but they reply by adding false information and lies. And if the block isn't undone then it really would be the crappess site ever made. Because you got stupid users who think they know everything. [[User:Soccermeko|Soccermeko]] ([[User talk:Soccermeko#top|talk]]) 00:08, 9 April 2008 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I don't care. No one care about Wikipedia. You try to contribute but they reply by adding false information and lies. And if the block isn't undone then it really would be the crappess site ever made. Because you got stupid users who think they know everything. [[User:Soccermeko|Soccermeko]] ([[User talk:Soccermeko#top|talk]]) 00:08, 9 April 2008 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I don't care. No one care about Wikipedia. You try to contribute but they reply by adding false information and lies. And if the block isn't undone then it really would be the crappess site ever made. Because you got stupid users who think they know everything. [[User:Soccermeko|Soccermeko]] ([[User talk:Soccermeko#top|talk]]) 00:08, 9 April 2008 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
  • Comment Why would I waste time adding back the information if you were going to add it back. On top of that, I said that I didn't really care about Wikipedia and the reason I'm doing this for the other users. Deenaharp and Leofan and anyone else were blocked by the real sockpuppet master Cloudz. Sockspuppets "Kww", "Kurt Shaped Box" and "Hello Control". Soccermeko (talk) 00:08, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Soccermeko&oldid=204339986"