Jump to content

Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. v. United States

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Wikidea (talk | contribs) at 10:49, 16 April 2008 (Created page with ''''''Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. United States''''', 261 U.S. 592; 597, 58 Ct.Cl. 709, 43 S.Ct. 425, 67 L.Ed. 816 (1923) is a [[US Supreme Cour...'). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. United States, 261 U.S. 592; 597, 58 Ct.Cl. 709, 43 S.Ct. 425, 67 L.Ed. 816 (1923) is a US Supreme Court case on contract law.

The Supreme Court held that an implied in fact contract exists as,

"an agreement ... founded upon a meeting of minds, which, although not embodied in an express contract, is inferred, as a fact, from conduct of the parties showing, in the light of the surrounding circumstances, their tacit understanding."

Facts

Judgment

  • Full text of judgment from Justia