User talk:MarkBA~enwiki

Disputes

I have created a centralized discussion page at User talk:Elonka/Hungarian-Slovakian experiment. If you have concerns about the behavior of editors or the way that certain articles are being edited, please post them there (or at least add it to your watchlist). Thanks, El on ka 06:48, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abusive sockpuppetry per this CheckUser case.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. El on ka 08:58, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

MarkBA~enwiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry, but I consider it the height of someone's aggressive campaign. There's absolutely no evidence, no supporting facts, nothing, just a false accusation of abusive sockpuppetry, slapped block and that's all. If you would read carefully, the style of the IPs is bit to quite different of mine; I have nothing to do with them. Similarly, someone might have seen me doing something and decided to adopt such style; note that learning to revert on WP is as easy as ABC. In addition, I don't see the point of blocking of a "dead" user and adding him/her into the blacklist. In a nutshell, I consider this block as highly unjustified and biased and I think I have the right to contest this block. I know my chance right now is maybe 1:25; I still think I have stayed within the limits; no one has also proof that all IPs are mine, so you're on a wrong trail, caused by some red herring. Do you consider my contributions disruptive? For the God's sake, take a better look once again and you'll see that this is just another hogwash; I have always contributed productively and I still consider myself productive and I'm not willing losing time dealing with users who can only break the things down and always stopped if things were going too crazy or similar. I also don't like that without my permission you're editing my own page; although I know it doesn't belong to me, unless you have a good reason I don't want to have my page edited; I mean, although message might be a bit provocative, it stays perfectly within the policies, as: 1. it doesn't attack anyone in particular and 2. it's just my personal opinion. Please, reconsider your actions and either lift the block and apologize for a mistake or at least cut it into 24 hours maximum, due to the real-world circumstances. In return, I promise that if I'll be ever editing Wikipedia sometime, it will be for most of the time a productive side. If it's declined without proper reason then I'll seriously reconsider my return to Wikipedia. I have nothing else to say. MarkBA ^{what's up?/my mess} 13:25, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Sorry, but I consider it the height of someone's aggressive campaign. There's absolutely ''no'' evidence, no supporting facts, nothing, just a '''false accusation''' of abusive sockpuppetry, slapped block and that's all. If you would read carefully, the style of the IPs is bit to quite different of mine; I have nothing to do with them. Similarly, someone might have seen me doing something and decided to adopt such style; note that learning to revert on WP is as easy as ABC. In addition, I don't see the point of blocking of a "dead" user and adding him/her into the blacklist. In a nutshell, I consider this block as highly unjustified and biased and I think I have the right to contest this block. I know my chance right now is maybe 1:25; I still think I have stayed within the limits; ''no one'' has also proof that all IPs are mine, so you're on a wrong trail, caused by some red herring. Do you consider my contributions disruptive? For the God's sake, take a better look once again and you'll see that this is just another hogwash; I have always contributed productively and I still consider myself productive and I'm not willing losing time dealing with users who can only break the things down and always stopped if things were going too crazy or similar. I also don't like that without my permission you're editing my own page; although I know it doesn't belong to me, unless you have a good reason I don't want to have my page edited; I mean, although message might be a bit provocative, it stays perfectly within the policies, as: 1. it doesn't attack anyone in particular and 2. it's just my personal opinion. Please, reconsider your actions and either lift the block and apologize for a mistake or at least cut it into 24 hours maximum, due to the real-world circumstances. In return, I promise that if I'll be ever editing Wikipedia sometime, it will be for most of the time a productive side. If it's declined without proper reason then I'll seriously reconsider my return to Wikipedia. I have nothing else to say. [[User:MarkBA|MarkBA]] <sup>[[User talk:MarkBA|what's up?]]/[[Special:Contributions/MarkBA|my mess]]</sup> 13:25, 19 April 2008 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Sorry, but I consider it the height of someone's aggressive campaign. There's absolutely ''no'' evidence, no supporting facts, nothing, just a '''false accusation''' of abusive sockpuppetry, slapped block and that's all. If you would read carefully, the style of the IPs is bit to quite different of mine; I have nothing to do with them. Similarly, someone might have seen me doing something and decided to adopt such style; note that learning to revert on WP is as easy as ABC. In addition, I don't see the point of blocking of a "dead" user and adding him/her into the blacklist. In a nutshell, I consider this block as highly unjustified and biased and I think I have the right to contest this block. I know my chance right now is maybe 1:25; I still think I have stayed within the limits; ''no one'' has also proof that all IPs are mine, so you're on a wrong trail, caused by some red herring. Do you consider my contributions disruptive? For the God's sake, take a better look once again and you'll see that this is just another hogwash; I have always contributed productively and I still consider myself productive and I'm not willing losing time dealing with users who can only break the things down and always stopped if things were going too crazy or similar. I also don't like that without my permission you're editing my own page; although I know it doesn't belong to me, unless you have a good reason I don't want to have my page edited; I mean, although message might be a bit provocative, it stays perfectly within the policies, as: 1. it doesn't attack anyone in particular and 2. it's just my personal opinion. Please, reconsider your actions and either lift the block and apologize for a mistake or at least cut it into 24 hours maximum, due to the real-world circumstances. In return, I promise that if I'll be ever editing Wikipedia sometime, it will be for most of the time a productive side. If it's declined without proper reason then I'll seriously reconsider my return to Wikipedia. I have nothing else to say. [[User:MarkBA|MarkBA]] <sup>[[User talk:MarkBA|what's up?]]/[[Special:Contributions/MarkBA|my mess]]</sup> 13:25, 19 April 2008 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Sorry, but I consider it the height of someone's aggressive campaign. There's absolutely ''no'' evidence, no supporting facts, nothing, just a '''false accusation''' of abusive sockpuppetry, slapped block and that's all. If you would read carefully, the style of the IPs is bit to quite different of mine; I have nothing to do with them. Similarly, someone might have seen me doing something and decided to adopt such style; note that learning to revert on WP is as easy as ABC. In addition, I don't see the point of blocking of a "dead" user and adding him/her into the blacklist. In a nutshell, I consider this block as highly unjustified and biased and I think I have the right to contest this block. I know my chance right now is maybe 1:25; I still think I have stayed within the limits; ''no one'' has also proof that all IPs are mine, so you're on a wrong trail, caused by some red herring. Do you consider my contributions disruptive? For the God's sake, take a better look once again and you'll see that this is just another hogwash; I have always contributed productively and I still consider myself productive and I'm not willing losing time dealing with users who can only break the things down and always stopped if things were going too crazy or similar. I also don't like that without my permission you're editing my own page; although I know it doesn't belong to me, unless you have a good reason I don't want to have my page edited; I mean, although message might be a bit provocative, it stays perfectly within the policies, as: 1. it doesn't attack anyone in particular and 2. it's just my personal opinion. Please, reconsider your actions and either lift the block and apologize for a mistake or at least cut it into 24 hours maximum, due to the real-world circumstances. In return, I promise that if I'll be ever editing Wikipedia sometime, it will be for most of the time a productive side. If it's declined without proper reason then I'll seriously reconsider my return to Wikipedia. I have nothing else to say. [[User:MarkBA|MarkBA]] <sup>[[User talk:MarkBA|what's up?]]/[[Special:Contributions/MarkBA|my mess]]</sup> 13:25, 19 April 2008 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}