Jump to content

User talk:ABF

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 82.22.5.79 (talk) at 21:09, 23 September 2008 (→‎"Unconstructive editing": new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

   Präambel
Trolle!Hier nicht!
Trolle!Hier nicht!
Trolle!Hier nicht!
Trolle!Hier nicht!
  • This is the talk Page of ABF.
  • Please be friendly
  • Old diskussions are in the Archiv1
  • Pleasee give a good headline by using == Headline ==
  • Sign by using --~~~~

RfA Thanks

My RfA

I can has mop?
I can has mop?
Hi ABF! Thank you for your support in my RfA (87/3/3).
I truely appreciate the many votes of confidence, and I will exert myself to live up to those expectations. Thanks again!
CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:56, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

3RR violation

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on User_talk:Cunard. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Edit war with 64.230.4.19 Pinkyviolence (talk) 02:17, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please read before adding templates. this says I am allowed to revert obvious vandalism. And telling someone "fuck you" is for me obvious vandalism! abf /talk to me/ 06:18, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, so NOW you're an expert on the 3 revert rule. You sure weren't when [1] happened. So fuck you. Pinkyviolence (talk) 02:17, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hehe, yeah, I was not at that time. And can you please log in or stop using other users signatures, please? abf /talk to me/ 06:24, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
LOL! Look at his userpage, it actually tricked someone! :D64.230.7.84 (talk) 06:24, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I do not know what you mean, but please stop messing me up if you do not have anything including any sense you can tell. abf /talk to me/ 06:26, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What the heck is going on??? I never made any of those comments!!! I logged in today, only the 2nd day I've been registered, and it warned me to not make personal attacks?! I think someone is pretending to be me in an effort to troll this page. This site is starting to get frustrating. Pinkyviolence (talk) 11:50, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! The edits where made by a troll who faked your signature. I reportet him to WP:AN/I and the case is solved. abf /talk to me/ 12:38, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The troll who was faking the signature of was Pinkyviolence was 64.230.7.84. -- IRP (talk) 18:21, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal

The vandal that you warned this morning has been continuing to vandalize pages and has already received multiple warnings. Here are some other instances of vandalism: [2] [3] [4] [5]

I'm just letting you know, so that you can block that address or list it on WP:AIV if you want. --Politizer (talk) 14:06, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I am not a sysop, so I cant block him. You can report him on your own, because in my oppinnion Users should be reportet by the reverting user. abf /talk to me/ 14:10, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--Balver (talk) 08:10, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merci :) abf /talk to me/ 13:02, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When reverting vandalism, you should be careful that your edits still do not contain any of the previously vandalized versions [6] [7] --Superflewis(talk) 13:22, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

see here. Regards, abf /talk to me/ 13:23, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I walked off for 2 seconds and my child finds it funny to revert my apolidgy, i gave him a telling off and he wont do harm again

92.20.216.56 (talk) 14:44, 23 September 2008 (UTC)J D[reply]

Ah, so your childs are vandalizing and you do not? abf /talk to me/ 14:45, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am am morily outraged that you would say that im vandalising i think this is a disgrace. My child Toby did little harm, i mean adding a full stop how bad is that (i read the edits) I do have an acount at my house but seeing this is my exwifes house. (i dont have custody, and we're friends)I went on here and was going add some imformation when my child walked in, 13 years of age, and started being silly. If you want my apolidgy here it is but You have no proof it was me!. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.20.216.56 (talk) 14:53, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you. And you are able to stop your child from vandalizing. I am shure nothing will happen if your child does not continue. You can also say something as "It was not me but my son" on your talk. I am sorry, but I am not able to do more for you. Best regards, abf /talk to me/ 14:56, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its OK :) <- sorry if you cant use smileys but its ok, no worries, cause every little thing is gona be all right.Tht was a joke to show im happy not vandalism ok bye!.

SORRY

MY CHILD MADE THE VANDALISM. Not really (just wanted to make fun of the obvious troll above). Sorry for the vandalism, though. 78.151.61.148 (talk) 18:16, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Unconstructive editing"

Can you please explain why you believe my edit to Stephen Sondheim was unconstructive? I believe I added an important fact about his life that is mentioned nowhere else in the article, except in Categories. --82.22.5.79 (talk) 21:09, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]