Jump to content

Use of costume in Athenian tragedy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rjwilmsi (talk | contribs) at 09:55, 13 December 2008 (gen fixes: (1) set identical unnamed references to use named refs (1), using AWB). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The use of costume in Ancient Greek tragedy Some authors have affirmed that a standardized costume was used in Greek tragedy[1]. This is said to have consisted of a full-length or short tunic, a cloak and soft leather boots, and may have been derived from the robes of Dionysian priests or invented by Aeschylus. However, in Chapter 2 of The History of the Theatre (Oscar Brocket, 2006), this is disputed. The author says that the evidence we have is based on archaeological remains, some few references in the texts and the writings of later authors. As far as the vase paintings are concerned, most of these are dated later than the 5th Century BC and their relationship with theatrical practice is unclear. One of the earliest examples is a red-figure vase painting c. 500-490 B.C., which shows a tragic chorus invoking a ghost, on a crater (bowl), which is in the Antikenmuseum in Basle[2].

However this may be, the tragic actors were certainly heavily disguised. This had a religious purpose, for the actor was supposed to give up his identity in order to let another speak and act through him. Indeed, the dramas were performed in honour of Dionysus, the God of Ecstasy, which means “standing outside oneself”[2]. Actors therefore had to renounce their individuality. The actors thought that the mask itself contained the character and are said to have prayed before putting on their masks. The costume was probably an elaborately decorated version of everyday clothing worn in the 5th Century BC. The garments included:

  • chiton (robe or tunic)
  • chlaina (overgarment)
  • chlamys (short cloak)
  • kothurnus (short lace-up boots)
  • himation (overgarment)
  • peplos (cloak)[3].

The chiton worn by the actors differed from that worn in everyday life because it incorporated sleeves, which were coloured and patterned. The sleeves may in fact have been part of an undergarment. Long white sleeves were worn by the (male) actors for female roles, and indeed in vase paintings females are usually painted with lighter skin.

The costumes worn for the performances of Alcestis, for example, were iconographic, and symbolised the opposition of light and dark[4]. In the play, life is evoked as the act of seeing the sun. Death – the son of Night in 5th Century B.C. mythology - wears a black peplos and terrifying black wings. Apollo wears white, representing the sun. Admetus contrasts the black of the funeral procession with the white of the funeral procession. The corpse of Alcestis is dressed as a bride, in accordance with Greek tradition and Heracles wears a bearskin and carries a club.

The costumes worn gave the audience an immediate sense of character-type, gender, age, social status and class[5].

Around the time of Aeschylus, the boots or buskins worn by the actors were flat. The actors had the same “status” as the chorus. In the 3rd Century B.C., the actors were raised to the status of heroes and “platform” soles began to be used, together with a head-dress called an onkos. The raised soles may have induced a stylised way of walking, suited to the rhythm of tragic verse, and the onkos made the actors taller, enhancing visibility. Their bodies were padded so that they did not look too slim[6]. However, some authors believe that this happened later than the 3rd Century B.C. It is also thought that the “teetering gait” is a misapprehension[7].

The masks were the most striking feature of the costume worn by the Ancient Greeks. Facial expression was lost anyway due to the huge size of the Greek theatres, but the masks were also a means of blotting out expression, so visual meaning was expressed by the whole body. The actors were seen as silhouettes, or integral bodies, rather than faces.

The masks themselves were made of stiffened linen, thin clay, cork or wood, and covered the whole head and had hair.

Attempts have been made in modern times, to workshop the use of masks in order better to understand their use in Greek tragedy[8]. It has been found that masks can lead to a more demonstrative style of acting, with declamatory delivery of the lines substituted for intimacy. They also found that the mask can impede the projection of sound. The Greeks are said to have overcome this in various ways. Initially, the mouth apertures were small, but later this became a “wide-open” mouth. Some authors belive that the mouth was shaped like a “mouth-trumpet” and had an amplifying effect[9]. Certainly, the use of a mask covering the whole produces an enhanced resonating effect, which serves dramatic delivery.

Performances therefore had to be more physical. Peter Arnott states that the Greeks thought good acting and a good voice were synonymous. This was achieved through athletic training, voice exercises and diet.

Experiments have shown that unaccustomed actors suffer disorientation and restriction when masked. The Greeks countered this through a vocabulary of gesture known as cheironomia (gesticulation). Aristotle says that in his day excessive gestures were used – leading to overacting – compared with the older tradition.

Masks can also be used as a dramatic tool, e.g. lowering the masks shows reflection, raising the mask shows a challenge or superiority. The Greeks called these physical stances schemata.

Silent masks were used to great effect, particularly on child actors, expressing powerlessness, bewilderment, vulnerability, etc.

The used of masks enabled the three speaking actors to portray up to eight or nine characters, through multiple role-playing. This was linked with the fact that the Greeks did not look for psychological causes or individual choice in tragedy. They believed that the Gods distributed circumstances arbitrarily and in the same way roles were handed out arbitrarily to the actors.

The same character could therefore be played by different actors, and transitions within a character would be portrayed by the use of different masks.

The wide variety of masks used[10] is attested by Pollux, a rhetorician writing in 2nd Century AD, in his Onomastikon. He lists 30 different male masks (old age with white or grey hair, the tyrant with thick black hair, a fair, pale masks indicating sorrow or sickness, a boastful soldier, a rustic, servants, a cook, etc.) and 17 female masks (fat and thin old women, two matrons, one virgin, a bawd, a mistress, three courtesans, a lady’s maid, etc.).

References

  1. ^ The Greek and Roman Stage, D. Taylor
  2. ^ a b The Ancient Theatre, E. Simon
  3. ^ Costume in the Theatre, J. Laver
  4. ^ Tragedy in Athens, David Wiles
  5. ^ Greek Tragic Theatre, Rush Rehm
  6. ^ Costume in the Theatre, J. Laver.
  7. ^ A Guide to Greek Theatre and Drama, Kenneth McLeish
  8. ^ Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Theatre
  9. ^ The Ancient Theatre, E. Simon.
  10. ^ Costume in the Theatre, James Laver

Sources

  • The Greek and Roman Stage, David Taylor, 1999.
  • The Ancient Theatre, Erika Simon, 1972.
  • Greek Theatre Production, T.B.L. Webster, 1956.
  • History of the Theatre, Oscar Brockett, 2006.
  • An Introduction to the Greek Theatre, P. Arnott, 1959.
  • The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Theatre, 2007.
  • Greek Tragic Theatre, Rush Rehm, 1992.
  • A Guide to Greek Theatre and Drama, Kenneth McLeish, 2003.
  • Tragedy in Athens, David Wiles, 1997
  • Costume in the Theatre, James Laver, 1964

Further reading

  • Mask and Performance in Greek Tragey, David Wiles, 2007.