Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Sydney Opera House - Dec 2008.jpg

Reason: It's not a perfect image in terms of technicals (unfortunately, trains and cars running across the bridge cause a substantial amount of vibration which made the image slightly unsharp on a long exposure) and it is much lower resolution than some of my panoramas (still more than enough for FP though), but the view is good, and the nightscape allows the Opera House to stand out more than during the day. It also illustrates many articles prominently as per the articles list.
Articles this image appears in: Sydney Opera House, Sydney, New South Wales, Tourism in Sydney and Australian Landmarks
Creator: User:Diliff

Support as nominator --Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 09:24, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Lovely. Durova²⁸⁵ 14:14, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - A very good resolution, detail and lighting. Also good EV. - ☩Damërung ☩. -- 17:18, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support That still water is so beautiful. Staxringold _talk^contribs 20:31, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good EV, view --Muhammad(talk) 18:26, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ ~~Too dark, vibrations, water moving...~~ Just messing Support all the way... Excellent pic and rare to have not even a small amount of water traffic to disrupt the shot... Lovely... Gazhiley (talk) 10:07, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 06:35, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
support enough resolution, very nice composition – Wladyslaw (talk) 07:45, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, although I think it could be cropped much more tightly. Kaldari (talk) 15:37, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It could, but I think this framing allows you to see how the Opera House sits in relation to the environment better. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 15:55, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Noodle snacks (talk) 04:33, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderful. Nice and sharp. Good detail. (Orfo (talk) 21:53, 1 August 2009 (UTC))[reply]