Jump to content

Talk:Samuele Bacchiocchi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hop goblin (talk | contribs) at 14:14, 11 September 2009 (→‎Conspiracy theory). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconBiography Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconSeventh-day Adventist Church Start‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Seventh-day Adventist Church on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WikiProject icon
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HochThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
To-do list:
  • Expand "Glacier View Controversy" section, to include more background, history, theological issues, and details of the Glacier View meeting itself
  • Add to "Adventist Responses to Criticisms" section, ideally with material from Adventist scholars etc.

Conspiracy theory

I tagged the conspiracy theory as non-neutral because it seems to be a biased account of events written by someone with a vested interest. Is it important enough to show up in any independent reliable sources? If no, I suggest it be removed altogether. --Flex (talk/contribs) 14:39, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The non-neutral is unwarrented due tot he fact that any conspiracy theory may seem biased if the person reading may find disagreement in any form. I do not have a vested interest. I wish to present other conspiracy theories that have been well documented other than the one given. [[User:hop_goblin (talk/13:10, 11 September 2009 (UTC)