User talk:Misortie

SEMI-RETIRED

This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.

Hiya

Looks like I missed all the fun. Welcome back. What happened. Why did you decide to retire (and now semi-retire)? Daicaregos (talk) 17:00, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ello, I have had to semi-retire due to...real life commitments...lol. Getting ready for a trip to South Korea and hopefully, next year, Hong Kong or maybe even the United States. I was thinking about quitting altogether but then I remembered how much I love cleaning up vandalism! Also, things really have quietened down on UK related articles recently…The Scotland talk page has just began the lengthy process into recovery…--Sooo Kawaii!!! ^__^ (talk) 17:17, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wha'dya mean "real life commitments"? You make it sound as if there are more important things than Wikipedia! When are you off (and for how long)? Daicaregos (talk) 17:22, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lol. And maybe until Feb of next year, and when I do come back I am determined to create an article for the first time! --Sooo Kawaii!!! ^__^ (talk) 18:19, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I look forward to reading it. Don't forget to get back in touch on your return. Have a great time. Best, Daicaregos (talk) 20:34, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your intolerant and insulting comments are unwarranted personal attacks that have no place at Wikipedia

While you no doubt saw me going toe to toe with that editor over his edits, his sourcing and his approach, I have to say that I find your personal attacks completely out of line for someone who had no previous altercation with that editor. I strongly recommend that you revert your comments at Talk:Barack Obama and at that editor's personal talk page, and apologize to him and to the community for such an intolerant outburst of profanity and personal attack. Abrazame (talk) 20:26, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

N~~ope, sorry. The guys an Intolerant religious bigot. ~~idiot~~ and I make no apologies to Intolerant religious bigots. ~~idiot~~s. Feel free to remove it yourself. Or Mr. Super jesus fan can.~~--Sooo Kawaii!!! ^__^ (talk) 20:30, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted it. This sorta person is frustrating, yea, but the guy already backed himself into a rhetorical corner from the first moment. No one has stepped up to agree with him, and the edit suggestions are clearly not going to go into this or any other article. Don't give Jzyehoshua a glimmer of an escape route in this by insulting to the point that he pulls a CoM-style Victim Card. Chillax, bro. Tarc (talk) 20:31, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit - Thanks Tarc. I'm sorry, I'm just in a bit of rebellious mood.

Maybe the go to hell bit did sound a bit extreme, but what it was reffering to was the edits he made. In other words, he can go to hell if he makes such edits. --Sooo Kawaii!!! ^__^ (talk) 20:32, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did revert your attack at the user's talk page myself upon another moment's reflection. I maintain my advice that you apologize to this editor and to the community. Something said in the heat of an escalating argument, to a repeat delinquent who borders on vandalism with serial attacks and an inability to respond to salient points, or in response to a personal attack upon you would be bad enough but coming out of left field to lob an attack like that seems absolutely beyond the pale, especially when his suggestions have been solidly refuted.

A religious person is obviously going to take your Hell comment as a more heinous attack than one who is not religious. The definition of Bigot is "a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance". The only hatred expressed anywhere regarding that thread was your hatred, there and on the user's talk page. While I can't speak to the relative prejudice between you and he in the broader picture of your real lives, objectivity would find you to have acted the bigot in this instance. Intolerance is as repugnant when it is directed from within the religious community to others as it is when it is directed from others outside to the religious community. Abrazame (talk) 20:53, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

~~I was responding to his Edits on the Barrack Obama page. He made it very clear what sort of person he is from those malicious bigoted lying edits. I make no apologise, now let’s just leave it.~~Yeah I was in the wrong. I have only just got back from Heathrow terminal 4, standing around in the arrivals section is pretty tiring.--Sooo Kawaii!!! ^__^ (talk) 20:56, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Probable sock

While I agree with you about this problem editor (who is most likely a sockpuppet), this is not acceptable. Article talk pages are for discussion about improving articles, not discussion about the conduct of editors. There are other places to go for this sort of discussion - notably WP:RFC/U. -- Scjessey (talk) 21:40, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough.--Misortie (talk) 21:41, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK THIS GUY IS REALLY PI**ING ME OFF!!! Just seeing the garbage he is leaving on the talk page...--Misortie (talk) 14:02, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep cool

Frank, you really do need to calm down or you will find yourself getting blocked. If you don't like what you see at Domers page I would suggest staying away from it. Jack forbes (talk) 11:29, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have, and have no intention of going back. It's just disgusting what is on that page. He can't even explain himself to me.--Misortie (talk) 11:36, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good decision Frank. Hope you've taken that page off your watchlist. There's just no point in winding yourself up about things you can't change (Note to self: I should practice what I preach). Talking of awful things - have you visited the DMZ yet? Daicaregos (talk) 11:56, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I've only recently started taking my own advice and it is very good advice. Jack forbes (talk) 12:07, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just going to leave it now, I’m probably in the wrong and will force myself to unconditionally apologise soon to all those involved. And I won't be going to the DMZ sadly, not enough time. Plus, you have to book it to visit and we don't really know how. And my father won't ask any of his Korean work colleagues mainly because they hate talking about anything to do with there neighbour to the North. It’s an upsetting subject considering many have relatives there trapped in that hell hole. The last place I would want to live myself, along with slough.--Misortie (talk) 12:25, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If it'll make ya feel better, I've experienced the -you are the weakest link, goodbye- treatment at that user's talkpage, aswell. Just do what I do, have your 'delete' button ready if he should post on your talkpage. PS: Wowsers, that's the first time I've seen ya peeved. GoodDay (talk) 16:42, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tips for staying calm:

1) pretend it was you who tripped Fidel Castro
2) pretend it was you who hit Stephane Dion with the pie
3) imagine that the Slap Chop commerical has been canceled. GoodDay (talk) 17:19, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Have to agree with the above, I would have removed it myself if I had been conscious to see it. I don't like the way he treats other editors, but you met aggression with aggression and played a part in ramping things up. SirFozzie (talk) 18:21, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You weren't conscious? Who knocked you unconscious, Fozzie? Have you been in a scrap during the New Year festivities? :) Jack forbes (talk) 22:01, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Your question. This Deviant Art page [1], contains a page which clearly identifies the owner of that page ('kasuga39') as the author of these pictures which in turn identify him as the Wikipedia user of the same name. The same page identifies his website. You can go there but I wouldn't advise it. Some of the images on the site are of doubtful legality, and the images on some of the sites he links to are unquestionably illegal. Think of the children (talk) 14:23, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have no real interest in this, but what I can say is these are nothing more than cartoons and are not really a problem as it in no way interferes with his work on Wikipedia.--Misortie (talk) 23:28, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]