Jump to content

User talk:David spector

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by KeltieMartinFan (talk | contribs) at 01:19, 28 June 2010. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page–my talk page–as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~.

Vielen Dank!

Click here to leave me a new message.

Click here to watch this page.


An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Transcendental Meditation movement/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Transcendental Meditation movement/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Dougweller (talk) 11:22, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adding comments to talk page archives

Talk page archives are archives, not active discussions. They say in a big box at the top: "This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page." This edit [1] if it belongs anywhere, belongs on the current talk page, not in an archive. Fladrif (talk) 15:42, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Hannah Storm MILF-ness information

First of all, let me say this. Off the record, I don’t dispute the MILF-ness status of Hannah Storm, and I do share the interest of those who see the ESPN’s SportsCenter anchor in that light. I’m sure she is flattered by all this. There is nothing wrong about putting this particular piece of trivial tidbit on one’s blog page or one’s personal web page who might be a fan of hers. Nevertheless, on the record...she is a professional and reputable televison journalist. This is not a blog site or a celebrity fan page site. This is Wikipedia, a professional encyclopedia. Therefore, all personal feelings aside, this piece of trivial tidbit about Storm being a MILF does not belong here. KeltieMartinFan (talk) 11:48, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you feel certain that she would be flattered by this repulsive, sexist label? This is an inappropriate comment about the article. You need to stop projecting your personal viewpoint onto others. David Spector (talk) 12:57, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The term "milf" as a repulsive, sexist label? It is YOU who is “projecting your personal viewpoint” with this ridiculous statement you just made. How hypocritical on your part. If I offended you in anyway with this remark, to be very honest...I will just be happy with joy because you deserve it. Based on your statement, you seem to take huge offense to such minuscule terminology that was more common that you think. There’s a term for people like you, Ned Flanders. You just really need to CHILL!!! KeltieMartinFan (talk) 01:19, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]