User talk:Cobaltbluetony
![]() | Cobaltbluetony is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia soon. |
Template:Archive box collapsible
Useful links
- Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism
- Wikipedia:Requests for page protection
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR
- Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names
- one of my user page welcome templates
- my project pages
- Reset Wikipedia:Introduction
- User:Cobaltbluetony/Sandbox
- User:Cobaltbluetony/Articles that should be here or may soon
- {{subst:usernameblock|reason=it indicates a [[WP:SPA|single purpose account]] with an obvious [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]]|sig=~~~~}}
- {{tracklist}}
- POST NEW MESSAGES AT THE BOTTOM, OR BY CLICKING HERE.
This user appears to be another sockpuppet of User:Boboy9, based on their contribution history; they seem to be creating the same sort of copyvios about Philippine television stations (see contributions). I'm trying to tag them as copyvios (since I accidentally patrolled them all before realizing what was going on), but since the other site looks like a mirror that's a bit hard; since you've been involved with the other sockpuppets in this case, is there anything you can do about this? TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 04:02, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi there. I deleted the article using WP:CSD#G12 because it was a copyright infringement of http://en.wikipilipinas.org/index.php?title=DWEC-TV . That wiki does not properly release its content for use consistent with Wikipedia's definitions. Thanks for your assistance! Cheers and happy editing! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 14:48, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
- In that case, there's a whole slew of similar articles at Template:ABS-CBN Luzon which appear to have similar problems, many were created by the same editor (now banned for sockpuppetry and mass copyright violation) [1]. Mass deletion of these articles may be appropriate. Thanks. Christopher Connor (talk) 14:55, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
- The problem I encountered with that idea is that some of the stations were not part of that other wiki, so G12 didn't apply. Those, however, may simply be non-notable, as we have no way of establishing their notability. I might have time this week to review the criteria... - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:50, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
St Helens and Wigan derby
Hello, you just deleted this one per Twinkle as a cross-namespace redirect. I was just editing it in the article namespace though and was not aware that it had been moved elsewhere, so I'm wondering about the deletion. De728631 (talk) 17:48, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Notion (magazine)
Hey there,
I have added 3rd party references for this article. It is a genuine magazine with a following that can be bought in shops such a WH Smiths and many Newsagents. You can see from the number of people who are 'fans' on the facebook that people are aware of the magazine and the entire thing can be read online through the links provided, showing that it is a magazine regarded by a great number of companies as important.
It is Distributed but Comag and based in London.
I have removed any biased opinion and kept only to the facts of the magazine.
Jess
Jesspartridge (talk) 15:37, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Notice
I have renominated Jehovah's Witnesses reference works for deletion (third-party sourced material already merged to Jehovah's Witnesses publications) at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jehovah's_Witnesses_reference_works_(2nd_nomination), and have mentioned your previous participation at the first discussion, the result of which was No consensus.--Jeffro77 (talk) 03:15, 23 July 2010 (UTC)