2013 German federal election
This article possibly contains original research. (January 2012) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All 598 seats (plus any overhangs) in the Bundestag 300 seats are needed for a majority | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is part of a series on the |
Politics of Germany |
---|
The next German federal election will be an election to determine the 598 (or more) members of the 18th Bundestag, the federal parliament of Germany.[1] If it is a regular election, it will be held on a Sunday or holiday between 1 September and 27 October 2013. However, it might be held earlier under certain or later under exceptional circumstances.
In the last federal election in 2009, the Christian Democratic Union (CDU); its Bavarian sister party, the Christian Social Union (CSU); and the Free Democratic Party (FDP) won the election with Angela Merkel as Chancellor and Guido Westerwelle as Vice-Chancellor. The Social Democratic Party (SPD) however suffered its worst defeat, SPD leader Frank-Walter Steinmeier conceded[2] and announced his intention to become head of the opposition in the Bundestag.[3]
Date
The date of the next German federal election is governed by the constitution, the Basic Law, and the Federal Election Law (Bundeswahlgesetz).
Article 39 of the Basic Law states that the Bundestag shall be elected between 46 and 48 months after the beginning of the legislative period. As the 17th Bundestag convened on 27 October 2009, the next election will be scheduled between 27 August and 27 October 2013. As the Federal Election Law states that the election day must be a Sunday or public holiday, the dates of 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 September and 3 (Day of German Unity), 6, 13, 20 or 27 October would be within the scope of the Basic Law and election law.
To avoid school holidays, a date in late September is usually chosen; this would make 22 or 29 September 2013 the most likely dates.
The Basic Law provides for three possibilities to shorten or prolong the legislative period, and therefore move election day, which have rarely or never been used.
In case of an imminent or ongoing attack on Germany the Federal President is to declare the Case of Defence (article 115a of the Basic Law). In this case, the legislative period ends six months after the end of the Case of Defence (article 115h).
The more probable cases of shortening the legislative period are provided for in articles 63 and 68 of the Basic Law. The former states that the Federal President may (or may not) dissolve the Bundestag if during a vacancy in the office of Federal Chancellor the Bundestag fails to elect a new Chancellor with a majority of votes within fourteen days after the Federal President proposing a new Chancellor. The latter article allows the Federal Chancellor to ask the Federal President to dissolve the Bundestag after the Chancellor has lost a vote of confidence in the Bundestag. The President is once again free to choose whether to dissolve the Bundestag or not.
Of these three possibilities of changing the legislative period of a Bundestag, only the dissolution according to article 68 has been used in practice (1972, 1983 and 2005).
In case of a dissolution the snap election must take place within sixty days. During the Case of Defence the dissolution of the Bundestag is not possible.
Electoral system
In general, the Bundestag is elected using a mixed member proportional system. Voters have two votes: With their first they elect a member of Bundestag for their constituency, with the second they vote for a party. The seats in the Bundestag are generally distributed according to the second (party) votes. Until 2009, a party who won more districts in a given state than it was entitled to according to the number of second votes it received in that state could keep these "overhang" seats.
This electoral system must be changed under an order of the Federal Constitutional Court. The court stated that a provision in the Federal Election Law which makes it possible for a party to lose seats due to more votes violates the constitutional guarantee of the electoral system being equal and direct.[4]
This change should have been made by 30 June 2011. However, the government failed to present appropriate legislation in time to make this deadline.
Chancellor-candidates
Although the "chancellor-candidates" (Kanzlerkandidaten) play a very important role in election campaigns, their "office" is not regulated in any law. So it is up to each party to determine how (and if at all) to name a "chancellor-candidate".
The SPD names a chancellor-candidate while the CDU and the CSU name a common one. The smaller Bundestag parties (FDP, Left and Greens) usually[5] do not name a chancellor-candidate as it is very improbable for such a candidate to actually be elected chancellor. They instead name one or two persons (Spitzenkandidaten) who are to become the faces of that party's campaign. Fringe parties often name a chancellor-candidate although there is nearly no chance for them to win seats in the Bundestag, not to speak of their candidate to become chancellor.
While a sitting chancellor is usually named chancellor-candidate for his or her own party, the main opposition party's process to determine their chancellor-candidate differs. Most times, such a person is determined in an inner party circle and then anointed in a party convention.
As the CDU/CSU is the main government party, CDU chairwoman (and incumbent chancellor) Angela Merkel is unlikely to be challenged as chancellor-candidate unless she decides not to seek that post. In the SPD, the situation is a bit less clear: Usually, the party chairman (in this case, Sigmar Gabriel) and the parliamentary party chairman (Frank-Walter Steinmeier) are considered to be among the front runners for nomination. And so are ministerpresidents: during the 16-year chancellorship of Helmut Kohl, the SPD nominated a former Berlin Mayor and four sitting ministerpresidents (govenors) against him. At the moment, Peer Steinbrück, Minister of Finance during the 2005–2009 grand coalition and now a backbencher, is doing extremely well in opinion polls as he had gained reputation during the financial crisis.
Gabriel, Steinmeier and Steinbrück all have a bad electoral record as they all had lead their party into painful defeats in state or general elections (Gabriel and Steinbrück lost their inherited ministerpresident offices in 2003 and 2005, Steinmeier failed as a chancellor-candidate in 2009).
Polls
In Germany, there are regular polls during the whole of the legislative period. Current polls as of February 2012 suggested that, were the next election to take place at that time, Chancellor Merkel's CDU/CSU would be the first party with 38% of the vote, the Social Democrats would win 27%, the Greens 13%, the Pirates 7%, the Left 8%, and the Free Democratic Party would not poll enough votes for repesentation in the Bundestag with only around 3% of the votes cast. Every poll suggests that neither CDU/CSU and FDP nor SPD and Greens, partners in the 1998–2005 Schröder government, would have the possibility of gaining a majority of seats together in parliament.[6]
Polls
West and East
Institute |
Date | CDU/CSU |
SPD |
GREEN |
FDP |
LINKE |
PIRATES |
Others |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2009 election | 27 September 2009 | 33.8% | 23.0% | 10.7% | 14.6% | 11.9% | 2.0% | 4.0% |
Forsa | 8 February 2012 | 38% | 27% | 13% | 3% | 8% | 7% | 4% |
Emnid | 5 February 2012 | 35% | 28% | 14% | 3% | 7% | 8% | 5% |
Infratest Dimap | 2 February 2012 | 36% | 29% | 15% | 3% | 7% | 6% | 4% |
Forschungsgruppe Wahlen | 27 January 2012 | 36% | 30% | 16% | 3% | 7% | 5% | 3% |
GMS | 26 January 2012 | 36% | 29% | 15% | 3% | 7% | 6% | 4% |
Allensbach | 25 January 2012 | 35.0% | 29.0% | 16.5% | 4.0% | 7.0% | 4.0% | 4.5% |
Infratest Dimap | 19 January 2012 | 36% | 29% | 15% | 3% | 7% | 6% | 4% |
Infratest Dimap | 5 January 2012 | 35% | 30% | 16% | 2% | 6% | 6% | 5% |
Infratest Dimap | 23 December 2011 | 36% | 30% | 16% | 3% | 6% | 6% | 3% |
Infratest Dimap | 1 December 2011 | 35% | 30% | 16% | 3% | 7% | 6% | 3% |
Infratest Dimap | 25 November 2011 | 35% | 30% | 14% | 3% | 7% | 7% | 4% |
Emnid[7] | 2 October 2011 | 32% | 28% | 17% | 4% | 7% | 7% | 5% |
Forsa[8] | 20 September 2011 | 31% | 28% | 20% | 3% | 9% | - | 9% |
Forsa[8] | 14 September 2011 | 31% | 29% | 19% | 4% | 9% | - | 8% |
Forsa[9] | 26 August 2011 | 33% | 25% | 21% | 5% | 9% | - | 7% |
Forsa[10] | 19 August 2011 | 32% | 26% | 21% | 5% | 8% | - | 8% |
Forschungsgruppe Wahlen[11] | 6 May 2011 | 33% | 29% | 21% | 4% | 7% | - | 5% |
Infratest dimap[11] | 5 May 2011 | 35% | 26% | 23% | 4% | 7% | - | 5% |
Forsa[11] | 4 May 2011 | 31% | 21% | 28% | 4% | 8% | - | 8% |
Emnid[11] | 1 May 2011 | 34% | 24% | 24% | 4% | 8% | - | 6% |
Forsa[12] | 27 April 2011 | 31% | 21% | 28% | 4% | 8% | - | 8% |
Emnid | 17 April 2011 | 32% | 23% | 24% | 5% | 9% | - | 7% |
Forschungsgruppe Wahlen | 15 April 2011 | 34% | 27% | 23% | 4% | 7% | - | 5% |
Infratest dimap | 15 April 2011 | 33% | 26% | 24% | 4% | 8% | - | 5% |
Emnid | 13 April 2011 | 30% | 24% | 27% | 4% | 8% | - | 7% |
Emnid | 10 April 2011 | 33% | 25% | 24% | 4% | 8% | - | 6% |
Infratest dimap | 7 April 2011 | 33% | 27% | 23% | 5% | 7% | - | 5% |
Forsa[13] | 6 April 2011 | 30% | 23% | 28% | 3% | 9% | - | 7% |
Emnid[13] | 3 April 2011 | 33% | 26% | 23% | 5% | 8% | - | 5% |
Forschungsgruppe Wahlen[14] | 1 April 2011 | 34% | 28% | 19% | 5% | 8% | - | 6% |
Forsa[14] | 30 March 2011 | 33% | 25% | 21% | 5% | 8% | - | 8% |
Emnid[14] | 27 March 2011 | 34% | 27% | 20% | 4% | 9% | - | 6% |
Infratest dimap[14] | 24 March 2011 | 35% | 27% | 21% | 5% | 7% | - | 5% |
Forsa[14] | 23 March 2011 | 33% | 25% | 20% | 5% | 8% | - | 8% |
GMS[14] | 21 March 2011 | 34% | 27% | 20% | 5% | 8% | - | 6% |
Emnid[15] | 20 March 2011 | 34% | 28% | 18% | 5% | 9% | - | 6% |
Infratest dimap[15] | 18 March 2011 | 35% | 28% | 20% | 5% | 7% | - | 5% |
Allensbach[15] | 16 March 2011 | 36.5% | 29% | 15% | 6.5% | 8% | - | 5% |
Forsa[15] | 16 March 2011 | 36% | 26% | 18% | 5% | 9% | - | 6% |
Forsa[15] | 16 March 2011 | 36% | 26% | 15% | 6% | 10% | - | 7% |
Emnid[15] | 13 March 2011 | 35% | 28% | 15% | 6% | 10% | - | 6% |
Infratest dimap[15] | 12 March 2011 | 35% | 28% | 15% | 6% | 9% | - | 7% |
Forsa[11] | 9 March 2011 | 36% | 26% | 16% | 5% | 10% | - | 7% |
Emnid[11] | 6 March 2011 | 33% | 29% | 15% | 7% | 9% | - | 7% |
Forsa | 2 March 2011 | 34% | 27% | 16% | 5% | 10% | - | 8% |
Emnid | 27 February 2011 | 35% | 28% | 16% | 6% | 9% | - | 6% |
Forschungsgruppe Wahlen | 25 February 2011 | 36% | 29% | 15% | 5% | 9% | - | 5% |
Infratest dimap | 24 February 2011 | 35% | 27% | 17% | 6% | 8% | - | 7% |
Allensbach | 23 February 2011 | 36.0% | 28.5% | 16.5% | 6.5% | 7.5% | - | 5.0% |
Forsa | 23 February 2011 | 36% | 23% | 18% | 5% | 10% | - | 8% |
Emnid | 20 February 2011 | 35% | 25% | 19% | 6% | 9% | - | 6% |
Infratest dimap | 18 February 2011 | 37% | 25% | 18% | 5% | 8% | - | 7% |
Forsa | 16 February 2011 | 36% | 22% | 19% | 5% | 11% | - | 7% |
Infratest dimap | 14 February 2011 | 35% | 26% | 19% | 5% | 9% | - | 6% |
Emnid | 13 February 2011 | 34% | 25% | 19% | 6% | 10% | - | 6% |
Forschungsgruppe Wahlen | 11 February 2011 | 36% | 27% | 17% | 5% | 9% | - | 6% |
Forsa | 9 February 2011 | 36% | 22% | 20% | 5% | 10% | - | 7% |
Emnid | 6 February 2011 | 35% | 27% | 17% | 5% | 10% | - | 6% |
Infratest dimap | 3 February 2011 | 36% | 25% | 19% | 5% | 8% | - | 7% |
Forsa | 2 February 2011 | 36% | 22% | 21% | 5% | 9% | - | 7% |
Institute |
Date | CDU/CSU |
SPD |
GREEN |
FDP |
LINKE |
PIRATES |
Others |
2009 election | 27 September 2009 | 33.8% | 23.0% | 10.7% | 14.6% | 11.9% | 2.0% | 4.0% |
West
Institute |
Date | CDU/CSU |
SPD |
GREEN |
FDP |
LINKE |
Others |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Infratest dimap[16] | 3 February 2011 | 37% | 26% | 21% | 5% | 4% | 7% |
Infratest dimap[16] | 14 February 2011 | 36% | 27% | 21% | 5% | 5% | 6% |
Allensbach[16] | 18 February 2011 | 39% | 27% | 19% | 5% | 4% | 6% |
Infratest dimap[16] | 24 February 2011 | 37% | 29% | 18% | 6% | 4% | 6% |
Favorite coalition
Institute |
Date | CDU/FDP |
SPD/GREENS | CDU/SPD | CDU/GREENS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Emnid[13] | 1 April 2011 | 10% | 32% | 23% | 15% |
Chancellor
Institute |
Date | Merkel |
Steinmeier |
Trittin |
Künast |
Kretschmann |
Roth |
Özdemir |
Gabriel |
Steinbrück |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forsa[17] | 2 March 2011 | 43% | 29% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Forsa | 9 March 2011 | 44% | 29% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Forsa | 16 March 2011 | 40% | 31% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Forsa | 16 March 2011 | 40% | 32% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Forsa[18] | 14 April 2011 | 38% | 32% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Forsa[18] | 14 April 2011 | - | - | 12% | 15% | 12% | 11% | 10% | - | - |
Forsa[18] | 30 March 2011 | 39% | 35% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Forsa[19] | 19 April 2011 | 51% | - | 28% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Forsa[19] | 19 April 2011 | 52% | - | - | 27% | - | - | - | - | - |
Forsa[19] | 19 April 2011 | 45% | 39% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Forsa[19] | 19 April 2011 | 49% | - | - | - | - | - | - | 22% | - |
Forsa[20] | 19 April 2011 | 39% | 35% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Forsa[21] | 1 February 2012 | 46% | 30% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Forsa[21] | 1 February 2012 | 57% | - | - | - | - | - | - | 19% | - |
Forsa[21] | 1 February 2012 | 48% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 31% |
Forsa[22] | 8 February 2012 | 49% | 28% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
References
- ^ "Der Wahltermin für die Bundestagswahl 2009". Der Bundeswahlleiter. Retrieved 5 January 2009.
{{cite news}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help) - ^ "Merkel's rival concedes defeat in German election". The Daily Telegraph. London. 27 September 2009. Retrieved 20 May 2010.
- ^ "Steinmeier wird Oppositionsführer". Die Zeit. 27 September 2009.
- ^ Federal Constitutional Court decision on the Federal Election Law
- ^ The FDP named their chairman, Guido Westerwelle, chancellor-candidate in 2002.
- ^ A rather up-to-date compilation of poll results by wahlrecht.de
- ^ AFP unitednews
- ^ a b Wahltrend: SPD erreicht besten Umfragewert seit drei Jahren - Deutschland - FOCUS Online - Nachrichten
- ^ Forsa-Umfrage: Rot-Grün verliert die Umfragemehrheit | Politik | ZEIT ONLINE
- ^ Forsa-Wahltrend: FDP schafft die Fünf-Prozent-Hürde - Nachrichten Politik - Deutschland - WELT ONLINE
- ^ a b c d e f Sonntagsfrage – Umfragen zur Bundestagswahl (Wahlumfrage, Wahlumfragen)
- ^ "Grüne nur noch drei Prozentpunkte hinter Union". Reuters. 4 May 2011.
- ^ a b c http://newsticker.sueddeutsche.de/list/id/1135139
- ^ a b c d e f Wahlen, Wahlrecht und Wahlsysteme
- ^ a b c d e f g Sonntagsfrage – Infratest dimap
- ^ a b c d Sonntagsfrage – Infratest dimap (West)
- ^ Infografik zu: Wahlumfrage: stern-RTL-Wahltrend im Zeitverlauf - Politik | STERN.DE
- ^ a b c Infografik zu: Wahlumfrage: stern-RTL-Wahltrend im Zeitverlauf - Politik | STERN.DE
- ^ a b c d stern-RTL Wahltrend: Die grüne K-Frage - Politik | STERN.DE
- ^ Infografik zu: Wahlumfrage: stern-RTL-Wahltrend im Zeitverlauf - Politik | STERN.DE
- ^ a b c Keiner kommt an Merkel ran | NTV.DE
- ^ Merkel faerbt ab | NTV.DE