User talk:Rezter
Hail to the Thief
Hi! Thanks for volunteering to review the HTTT page for a good article status. Just thought I'd let you know that the article was recently peer reviewed, but that I (the primary author) haven't had time to implement the changes yet. I'm hoping to do it this weekend. If you wait until then, the article will hopefully be improved. But it's up to you - any review right now is totally appreciated. Thanks. Popcornduff (talk) 00:09, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the feedback, dude. I'll get onto it as soon as I get time in the next week. Popcornduff (talk) 23:47, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- I see what you're saying about moving all the production anecdotes to the production section - that seems obvious and makes sense. But do you think it's really best to separate the lyrical content from the musical content, as opposed to just talking about the songs as whole units? For me, when describing a song, it makes sense to describe it as a whole, music AND lyrics. But I'm open to persuasion here, if you can convince me!
- The other obstacle for me is how to describe the music without breaking the no-original-research rule. I know these songs intimately and have a musical background so I can describe them (and the album's music generally) in accurate detail, but that won't cut it: no original research. I'll have to pull in observations from music journals (which sometimes include factual inaccuracies, like mis-identified time signatures). Do you have any advice here? Popcornduff (talk) 20:53, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
DYK for While She Sleeps
 | On 14 June 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article While She Sleeps, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that While She Sleeps won the Kerrang! award for Best British Newcomer at the 2012 awards ceremony? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/While She Sleeps. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:05, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The North Stands for Nothing
The article The North Stands for Nothing you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:The North Stands for Nothing for things which need to be addressed. Statυs (talk) 02:36, 21 June 2012 (UTC)