User talk:Richardcavell

Welcome!

Hello, Richardcavell, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair | Talk 12:27, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi everyone,

I'm a doctor with interests in anatomy/radiology and medical law/forensics/administration. I like to make small corrections every now and then. I also occasionally contribute articles on medical topics. I'm interested in Aussie showbusiness, particularly community access television, such as Channel 31 Australia. I often create stubs and initiate new parts of articles.

The contributions that I'm most proud of, though, are grammatical/spelling/usage upgrades. Although you may see this as pedantic and unhelpful, I think that it is important to use the language correctly. It gives so much credibility to wikipedia to have precise, concise expression.

TV presenters

Hi mate, noticed your work on Rob Brough. It seems there's no information on this site on prominent Australian TV presenters like Darrell Eastlake, Jamie Durie, etc etc. Perhaps we could set up a project on this? Also I suggest you check out WikiProject AFL. Welcome to the site. Rogerthat 04:07, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CN XIII?

Richard: Recently you added a section to the cranial nerves article regarding a proposed renumber of the CNs; this is totally cool and I've never heard this before! Do you have a citation to put into the article? I don't doubt you, it's just that I've recently been trying to ensure properly cited neuroscience-related artciles. Thanks a lot, and I hope you keep making such awesome contributions! S e miconscious • talk 08:17, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I Hope you dont mind

I changed your userpage so people can contact you via your wikipedia email page instead of you displaying your email address which can cause spam, I hope you dont mind :) (See:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Richardcavell) - Mike Beckham 12:05, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I also added some userboxes to explain your situation easier I hope you dont mind that either heh :) - Mike Beckham 12:10, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

not for profit clarification

i appreciate your clarification. cheers Jackk 00:34, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think of my changes to the Amiga article?

I think the changes were good, and it's structured a lot better now, thanks. I disagreed with a few minor changes, but I've made edits in those cases. Mdwh 00:59, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Flicker fixing

AFAIK the only Amiga ever to have an inbuilt flicker fixer was the A3000. I've owned three Amigas myself - A500, A1200 and A4000 - and none of them have had a flicker fixer. JIP | Talk 21:33, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Escom/Amiga

The Escom released machines were more or less identical to the Commodore versions (OS3.1 instead of 3.0, a different floppy drive, and the A4000T also came in a new 060 version). Certainly not PowerPC based. See Amiga 1200 and Amiga 4000. Mdwh 03:17, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bea Arthur

If you check the edit summary and compare the changes, the category removed was Star Trek actors, not Star Wars. I don't dispute that she appeared in the holiday special, but she definitely has not appeared in any Star Trek production. The IMDb lists her as providing the voice of Suspiria in the Star Trek: Voyager episode "Cold Fire," but after reviewing the episode and doing a search on the internet, it's reasonably certain that someone placed this info on the IMDb without knowing what they were talking about--the person sounds nothing like her. I have removed the category again... if you have any evidence to the contrary showing that she was the voice in the Voyager episode, please add the source and return the category. Thanks! -- SmokeDetector47^{( TALK )} 03:25, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Could you reconsider your vote on my RfA? I've agreed not to block anybody for at least a year after I get admin privileges. --Carnildo 04:26, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reno 911

Is Suzy Kim the girl from the terrorist ep? If so, then yes, she was a guy. It was revealed that she was at the end when she and the person Trudy fell in love with were revealed to really be criminals. --DrBat 20:42, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Makemi RfA

File:Stick insect02.jpg

Thank you for voting on my RfA. It passed with a consensus to promote of 45/7/1. To those of you concerned about the fact that I am a relative newcomer, I encourage you to poke me with a sharp stick if I make a mistake. Or better yet, let me know on my talk page, and I'll do my best to fix it. Makemi 04:50, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you for your support on my request for adminship. It did not succeed, however, with votes of 10/19/11, so I have not yet become an administrator. I appreciate your support vote, though, and I look forward to see you vote for me next time! Should you have any questions, comments, or complaints at any point in the future, please do not hesitate to let me know on my talk page or via e-mail.

—JP06035

Hi Doc!

Hi, welcome to Wikipedia and enjoy. There is a place where the medically minded people hang out: WikiProject "Clinical Medicine". You are invited to join. The doctors' mess is here. Nephron T|C 03:28, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Abortion article

Thanks for your contribution. The article is in deep need of a lot more expertise and a lot less opinion.--Pro-Lick 04:24, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

My RfA recently closed and it was a success, passing at 84-02-00. I would like to thank you for taking the time to weigh in and on your subsequent support. Given that you have been quite active at RfA/RfB recently, your support means that much more. And I know it's quite cliche, but if you ever need any assistance by an admin, grab a Pepsi and don't hesitate to drop me a line on my talk page. Thanks again. Pepsidrinka 18:03, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

Richardcavell, thank you you so much for supporting my RfA, which passed successfully 49/6/3. I am grateful for all the supportive comments, and have taken people's suggestions to heart. I will do my best to live up to people's expectations. If I can ever make any improvements or help out in any way, please feel free to let me know! Thanks again for your much appreciated support.

¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 05:56, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

	My RfA
	Thank you for supporting/opposing/commenting on my request of adminship, sadly the result was 54/20/7 an thus only 73% support votes, resulting in that the nomination failed. As many of you commenting that I have to few main-space edits, I'll try to better my self on that part. If you have any ideas on what kind of articles I could edit, pleas send me a line. :)	_→AzaToth 09:43, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hey Richard, I'd really like thank you for taking the time to vote at my RfA. I withdrew due to certain controversies, but I appreciated your vote and hope to see you here in the future. Thanks again. --Khoikhoi 05:08, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Hey sir, thanks for supporting me on the request for adminship in wiki. I cannot understand how people are unappreciative to the work done by me on the wiki. and for the third time they told me to leave a couple of months and come back! Maltesedog 12:09, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DaGizza's RfA

Hi Richardcavell, thank you for supporting me in my RfA which passed with a tally of (93/1/2). If you need any help or wish discuss something with me, you are always welcome to talk to me. Gizza^Chat ^© 11:38, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA Results and Thanks

Richardcavell, thank you for supporting me in my recent RfA. Although it did not succeed as no consensus was declared (final: 65/29/7), I know that there is always an opportunity to request adminship again. If and when that day comes, I hope you will once again support me. If at any time I make any mistakes or if you would like to comment on my contributions to Wikipedia, you are more than welcome to do so. Regardless of your religious, cultural, and personal beliefs, I pray that whatever and whoever motivates you in life continues to guide you on the most righteous path.

--- joturner 07:14, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My (HereToHelp’s) RfA

Thank you for supporting my RfA. I’m proud to inform you that it passed with 75 support to 1 oppose to 2 neutral. I promise to make some great edits in the future (with edit summaries!) and use these powers to do all that I can to help. After all, that’s what I’m here for! (You didn’t think I could send a thank you note without a bad joke, could I?) --Here T oHelp 12:16, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Slicky's RFA

While Slicky removed his nomination without closing it properly, he's still sort of new to Wikipedia and was hinting at a withdraw of a nomination a few hours ago. While it was done improperly, it was a withdraw of a nomination and should have been properly closed instead of readded. Moe ε 18:51, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Hello Richardcavell, how are you? Thanks for your support in my RFA. The final vote count was (88/3/1), so I am now an administrator. I am very humbled by your vote and grateful. Please let me know if at any stage you require assistance, or if you have comments on how I am doing as an administrator. Once again thank you and with kind regards Gryffindor 17:10, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RFA Thanks

Thank you for your support vote on my RFA. The final result was a successful request based on 111 support and 1 oppose. Not as fancy as some of the other 'thank yous' in your collection above, but sincerely meant. :] --CBDunkerson 11:23, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Our RfAs

File:1000000eme.jpg

Another newly produced robot thanks you for your handiwork, and excuses himself while he practices his new abilities. Back in action soon! -- Hoary 10:13, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Richardcavell: Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a final tally of 77/3/0. I hope I can perform at the standards expected for administrators. If I make any mistakes, or you need anything, please let me know. Prodego ^talk 01:41, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Richardcavell. Just a quick note to thank you for your support in my RfA, which recently passed 62/13/6. I will do my very best live up to this new responsibility and to serve the community, but please let me know if I make any mistakes or if you have any feedback at all on my actions. Finally, if there is anything that I can assist you with - please don't hesitate to ask. Cheers TigerShark 03:38, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

William Stuart Brown

It aint POV but it's unreferenced so add a citation or remove it please. - Glen ^T _C 08:27, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please be civil - your note "happy now" was not in good faith. See the note re my change to the article - All articles need references - this is not my policy it is wikis. - Glen ^T _C 08:45, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Look it's not like I doubt the accuracy of what you've written it's just that (as you no doubt saw) I added some citations, categories and additional data to the article and could not see anything about him being booted for being gay - and as such I had to remove it. If it was only not "banned" until recently then you should be able to find a source easily correct? In regards to your statement being in good faith, next time someone requests something of you respond "happy now" and see if they misconstrue it as sarcasm - I think you'll find it is usually used in a sarcastic fashion. Regardless I apologise for taking it the wrong way. Thanks in advance, - Glen ^T _C 09:00, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

I noticed you left a message on a talk page about citations, you might want to check out Wikipedia:Inline_Citation - that's the how to guide on citations :) -- Tawker 07:25, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Masssiveego's votes on Requests for Adminship

Quoting the original message. "Are you serious about all those oppose votes? You commented that someone had too few photo uploads. Is that really one of your criteria? - Richardcavell 04:06, 6 April 2006 (UTC)"

Yes, serious about those votes. Mostly from some pretty good standards. For the photo thing, it's like this, it's possible, an admin has gots to be one of those leonardo da vinci types, the well rounded person, a jack of all trades. One small part of wikipedia is working with photos, dealing with images and stuff like that. If some newbie chatted with one of those admin types with a photo question, and just was like lost. That would be like blind guy leading blind guy, just aweful. So when the newbie got left confused because the admin was like so uptight specialized in one field of wikipedia, it's like what the? This is wikipedia? I like my admin knowing at something about everything. --Masssiveego 23:05, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kusma's RfA

Hello, Richardcavell! Thank you for your support in my recent successful request for adminship. If you ever have problems that you could use my assistance with or see me doing stupid things with my new buttons, don't hesitate to contact me. Happy editing, Kusma (討論) 20:01, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the support

Hi Richard- thanks a lot for your support on my recent, (barely) successful rfa. Your comments in particular probably garnered me a good five "supports", which i am quite grateful for. Please feel free to leave me any comments or criticisms on my talk page! --He:ah? 22:24, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Idea for the bot

Hi, have a look at what your bot did to Peter Hore. I don't have a problem with the bot deleting the image, but why doesn't it delete the fairuse tag as well? Otherwise the tag is 'orphaned' (to coin a term). - Richardcavell 13:40, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image license tags shouldn't appear in articles. They should only be applied to image description pages. Since the tag shouldn't have been there in the first place, I see nothing wrong with OrphanBot not removing it. --Carnildo 03:47, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blood Transfusions for JWs

Thanks for your contribution. The proper place for a sourced critical view of the JW position is:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jehovah%27s_Witnesses#Blood_2

I think it would be a great addition to the article. The first place was actually where the JW position was being discussed. Dtbrown 08:23, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Update tally please

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/NickCatal2 - as the closing bureaucrat, could you update the tally? - Richardcavell 07:27, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Richard, I am not a bureaucrat. The candidate indicated his withdrawal in a statement posted at 15:52, and I removed it from WP:RFA and closed it out properly after his withdrawal. For the record, the last vote came after his withdrawal. We should not be so concerned about the exact count, rather we should just use the RfA as feedback to the candidate and information for the rest of us when his next RfA comes. There is no need to adjust the count. Cheers, NoSeptember ^talk 11:41, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My Rfa

Hey, I noticed that you voted "oppose" on my RFA. I don't want to bury you with contrived reasons why you should support instead, so I won't. But, having just answered the extra questions that I hadn't been able to earlier, I'd appreciate it if you would take the time to read those answers (and my apology contained in them) and then decide if you ought to change your vote. I can totally see why you'd oppose--I have made some rather inexcusable mistakes. But regardless of whether or not your vote will stand, thank you very much for your time and consideration. Happy editing! Matt Yeager ♫ (Talk?) 18:53, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Cruel Eloise Worledge

Just to let you know i've raised points on the talk pages of the articles and would like your opinion. PMA 10:18, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Born in 1980 i was one of the kids that experienced the parental hysteria over Mr Cruel - i remember the police (?) blunder of releasing a primary school age photo of Karmein to the media in the immediate aftermath of her abduction, rather than a currrent 1991 photo. PMA 11:01, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine - i was born and grew up in the eastern 'burbs of Melbourne - i only moved to Tassie last year PMA 11:07, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ProhibitOnions's RfA

Thank you, Richardcavell!
	...for voting in my RFA. It passed with a result of 58/2/0. If you have any comments, or for some reason need any new-admin help, please let me know here. Sorry about the boilerplate. Regards, ProhibitOnions 22:39, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

Hi, this is Matt Yeager. I wanted to thank you for your vote on my request for adminship. The count was something like was 14/20/5 when I decided to withdraw the request. My decision was based on the fact that there are enough things wasting people's time on the Internet that doomed RFA's shouldn't be kept up for voters to have to think about. Regardless of the rationale behind your vote, I hope you will read this note for an extended note and discussion on what will happen before I make another try at adminship (I didn't want to clog up your userpage with drivel that you might not be interested in reading). Thank you very, very much for your vote and your time and consideration of my credentials--regardless of whether you voted support, nuetral, or oppose. Happy editing! Matt Yeager ♫ (Talk?) 01:32, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Vielen Dank!
Hello Richardcavell. Thank you for your support in my RfA! It passed with a final tally of 91/3/5. I am quite humbled and pleased by the community's show of confidence in me. If you need help or just want to talk, let me know. Cheers! -- F a ng Aili ^說嗎?

My RfA

Many thanks for your support on my recent RfA. It was successful. Thanks again, Mark83 10:52, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for supporting me in my RfA. I really didn't think people appreciate my work here that much, but it's nice to see you do: my Request was closed with 66 supports and 4 opposes. I'll do my best not to turn your confidence down. If in any point in the future you get the feeling I'm doing something wrong, do not hesitate to drop me a line. --Dijxtra 11:50, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MELB

Hi Richard. Wow... you really do spend a lot of time on RfA, don't you? :)

Saw your edits to Shaun Micallef and thought you might be interested to know about the WP:AWNB Australian Wikipedians' notice board and WP:MELB WikiProject Melbourne. WP:MELB has quite a lot of members/participants (anyone can just put their name up if they're interested), and we have had two meetups so far as well. :) You might also be interested in the formation of m:Wikimedia Australia. It's very much in the founding steps so far, so any thoughts you have on that would be more than welcome.

cheers, happy editing! --pfctdayelise (translate?) 16:24, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Forensics

Hi. Thanks for stopping by the AfD on Cool (African philosophy) (which I'd like to see renamed "Cool (African aesthetic)."

I glanced at your user page and note that one of your areas of interest is forensics. I haven't been by the prognathism article or the talk page in quite a while, but both may benefit from your participation. Peace. Deeceevoice 13:08, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We're at risk of not reaching consensus as the "merges" and "deletes" are splitting the vote, while I think most agree that the separate fork should go away. what would you think of changing to "delete" the fork? any relevant, cited content can always be added to the "cool" article (which already has some references to African-American culture) Justforasecond 17:51, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

Many thanks for your support of my recent RFA, which felicitously passed. I will endeavor to be meritable of your endorsement. :) Regards, Kaisershatner 20:58, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Amiga software piracy now in Amiga software

Hi. When I noticed that this excellent little article seemed headed for deletion, I took it upon myself to merge it into the Amiga Software article. In doing so, I've made a few changes; I hope you approve. Could you please take a look at Amiga_software#Piracy and fix any mistakes or infelicities you find in my work?

By the way, we might have a mutual acquaintance in Dr Eric Salter, who was big in the Melbourne Amiga scene for a while.

Cheers, CWC(talk) 09:32, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is/was a very good article. Thanks for writing it. It's not just of historical interest either; the current struggle between game publishers and CD-ROM/DVD-ROM copiers resembles the Amiga scene in many ways.

Thanks (?) for that google link. Oh.

See also my extended comment on the AfD page.

Your fellow Amiga fan, CWC(talk) 10:20, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kategorien

Ok, now I think about it both of the categories (plus the other two similar ones I was going to add) would have been enormous; would it be acceptable to have subcategories of them all? Is there a way of 'multiple inheritence' of categories, if you see what I mean? Legendary Steve 23:33, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What I meant with this, well using your examples of Australian paedophiles, there could be a paedophile category, an australian category, and an australian paedophile category that was a sub category of both of those categories? Just out of interest, why the interest in Aussie paedos? Legendary Steve 23:41, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to hear that, hope I didn't cause offence (and hope me saying that didn't cause offence (and hope that didn't ... ad infinitum )) Legendary Steve 23:51, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Dinkum

If you are helping him, I am satisfied. I'm not likely to leave the cat in place if he puts it back, however, especially without discussion. This page is frequently vandalised and is often volitile. It is often all I can do to keep things calm. G' Day from America. --CTSWyneken 23:33, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IPO

Not to worry, I've notified IPO, and he seems to have stopped the bad faith nominations--TBC^{??? ??? ???} 02:13, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias

Thank you, Richardcavell, for your support in my recent RfA! 8)--Rockero 23:18, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your message

Sure. Just did, as well. Linuxbeak (drop me a line) 04:29, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gillick

Hi.

Thanks for your comment on my talk page. I would happy to look over your essay, if you want provide your email on my talk page. I did my law thesis partially on medical consent in minors.

To the issue at hand: I don't think concurrent consents is a matter of the High Court 'changing its mind'. There simply is no explicit High Court authority on the issue. You noted that McHugh J said in Marion that Re R is 'inconsistent with Gillick', which presumably means he disagrees with it. However, the majority judgement gave no opinion on the matter, although they were certainly aware of Re R(they footnoted it). In any case, any opinion would have been obiter, as Marion did not reach the Gillick test.

On this last point, Marion can be quite a difficult case to understand becuase it was not a direct application of Gillick. Rather, Gillick was considered becuase it was relevant to arguments about the extent of parental power and the parens patriae jurisdiction. There is an argument that the reasoning of the majority in Marion regarding the issue of special medical procedures (Mason, Dawson et al) implicitly relied on Gillick terminating parental rights. Ummm... this argument is hard to present concisely but if you are interested I can further explain in email.

In any case, we lack explicit guidance as no subsequent cases in lower courts have raised concurrent consents because the parents have been in agreement with the minor's refusal. The issue is unlikely to be decided becuase of Australian court's willingness to use the parens patriae jurisdiction in medical matters, which renders irrelevant the need to rely on the parent.

For authority on the issue the doctor would need to have already proceeded in reliance on parental consent. Such cases usually run into procedural or evidential problems unless litigated by the minor (against their parents) straight away: how do you show what somebody's level of competence was x years ago? (an interesting recent case on this is Raabe v Brisbane Regional Health Authority [2005] QCA 041)

There are only about a few cases from Australian courts on Gillick and most are quite short. I would be happy to email you the citations if you leave an email address. You may already be familar: I am thinking Docs v Y, Re Jessica, Re Heather, Minister v AS, and the two Joseph's cases. However, none of these kids were actually found Gillick competent and all used the parens patriae jurisdiction. Mb99 08:41, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Humus_sapiens' RfA

I think you meant to say "I can't believe he's not an administrator already!"

Would you like to fix it before it gets archived? - Richardcavell 05:07, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Haha - I can't even believe I missed that. Thanks for the heads up, I have corrected myself. --Bachrach44 13:05, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just another RFA thank you note

Dear Richard, I appreciate your vote and your kind words in my RFA. It has passed with an unexpected 114/2/2 and I feel honored by this show of confidence in me. Cheers! ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 04:36, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Elementary, colleague!

Make sure 1) there is no empty line in between, and 2) Start the indented lines with # (folowed by "*", ":" or "#"). Click preview to see what happens. ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 08:57, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciation

Hello Richardcavell : ) I appreciate you taking the time to review my response to your concerns and then changing your vote. It was a kind and fair way to evaluate my potential admin skills. regards, FloNight ^talk 23:28, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you for voting at my RFA. Even though you did not vote for me, your counsel was appreciated. In the next few months, I intend to work on expanding my involvement in other namespaces and try a few different subjects than in the past. - CTSWyneken^Talk

Thanks for voting on my RfA

Thanks so much for voting!

Thanks so much for voting on my request for adminship. I have decided to withdraw my nomination as it seems that consensus will not be reached. If you voted in support, thanks for putting your trust in me to be a good admin. If you voted in opposition, thank you as well for your criticism as it will only help me be a better Wikipedian and perhaps help if/when I apply for adminship again sometime in the future.

--M e ts501^{talk • contribs} 01:33, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RFA

I replied to your comment on my RFA. If you need further clarification, I'm here. _-M ^o P-_ 00:51, 28 April 2006 (UTC) [reply]

To me, oppose and support votes are pretty much the same; supports mean you're doing something right, while opposes mean things need improvement. I welcome both. However, to further your analogy to a real election; Wikipedia is a democracy. In a real election, you don't hear just one party's view, right? You base your vote upon the facts that have been laid out by multiple people. So far, the facts at my RFA have been a few which I have tried to explain. Again, feel free to change your vote to an even stronger oppose, but I still believe that explanations should be given where they are needed. _-M ^o P-_ 01:07, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

rfa support

Thanks for the support on my RFA. Unfortunately, it did not achieve consensus. I look forward to your support in a couple months when I apply again. Holler at me if you need anything. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 01:11, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]