Jump to content

Talk:William Colgate

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Pburka (talk | contribs) at 01:01, 29 October 2012 (→‎Cut and paste #2: reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconBiography Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.


Untitled

"His sons Samuel Colgate and James Boorman Colgate were beneficiaries of the seminary..." - Beneficiaries or benefactors ?

Cutandpaste

I've reverted to a previous version, removing a paragraph which appears to have been cut-and-pasted from here, which leads to copyright questions, if nothing else. Cheers, LindsayHi 17:16, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cut and paste #2

In the history section, it says "he gave the following account to the writer of this sketch". Colgate died in 1857 and this is in fact coming from the first external link of the article. I guess it should be rewritten.85.1.37.174 (talk) 12:26, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like the external link may have, in turn, copied the text from Everts's 1883 The Baptist Encyclopaedia. That would make the text public domain. We should credit the original source, but have no obligation to rewrite it. Pburka (talk) 13:45, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks. What do you think of removing the words "to the writer of this sketch"? This is to not surprise the reader as to the author/date of the article.85.1.37.174 (talk) 23:51, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Go ahead. I have no opinion on the quality of the article, just on its legality. Pburka (talk) 01:01, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]