Jump to content

User talk:96.241.218.72

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 96.241.218.72 (talk) at 12:46, 16 August 2014 (→‎August 2014). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but you may want to consider creating an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (96.241.218.72) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 00:13, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Svoboda (political party). Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Please stop edit warring as you are here or you may be blocked from future editing. Also, please refrain from making bad faith accusations and inserting original research. Львівське (говорити) 23:41, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Svoboda (political party). During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 01:14, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Z10

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

96.241.218.72 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First of all I have full right to defend myself before being blocked. There were less than one hour between the posted accusation and this block. Here is my answer to this accusation I've tried to post as the response *The above diffs are showing that these reverts are not reverts but honest attempt to rise te quality of the article to a higher academic level. I removed only a personal opinion of anonymous Polish author and replaced it by two English language references providing facts instead offering opinions. Moreover, I asked the Wikipedia community to provide qualified opinions about this (very POV) issue in the article talkpage. The Львівське publicly declared to be supporter of this party: 'This user supports All-Ukrainian Union "Svoboda"'. I am not accusing him for anything, just pointing at the facts.

Decline reason:

I see four clear reverts within a 24 hour period. You were warned prior to the last revert and aware of the policy. In the future, please resolve your talk page discussion in lieu of simply edit warring with other editors. Kuru (talk) 01:54, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Nacionalni stroj, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jonathan C. Armstrong (talk) 00:37, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There was no vandalism, this warning can be ignored. GB fan 13:46, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. }}
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

96.241.218.72 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The same administrator who blocked this IP opened a sockpuppet investigation case here . The case is currently open. I posted my comment there as a proof of my innocence here. My defending comment was removed by the blocking administrator and this IP was blocked. In addition I'd like to say that this IP is used at least by two people. Stevan Hristic, Java Virtual Machine, and Arseniy Yatsenyuk articles user contributions do on belong to me. Thank you.--96.241.218.72 (talk) 00:23, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Any post made by a banned user may be removed on-sight. Although multiple people may have used this IP, the consistency of topics, grammar, and behaviour (not to mention technical reasons) show that the probability of you being the banned user is high enough for this block to stand. If a banned user wants to edit Wikipedia, then follow the right steps - otherwise, they just make it worse for themself the panda ₯’ 11:20, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

96.241.218.72 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No one shall be blocked because of simirarity of grammar and interest in the same topic as a banned user. My behaviour is in the line of Wikipedia rules. Every acussed person shall have full right to defend himself before any decision about his edit rights. The prosecutor is not the judge. Thank you.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=No one shall be blocked because of simirarity of grammar and interest in the same topic as a banned user. My behaviour is in the line of Wikipedia rules. Every acussed person shall have full right to defend himself before any decision about his edit rights. The prosecutor is not the judge. Thank you. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=No one shall be blocked because of simirarity of grammar and interest in the same topic as a banned user. My behaviour is in the line of Wikipedia rules. Every acussed person shall have full right to defend himself before any decision about his edit rights. The prosecutor is not the judge. Thank you. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=No one shall be blocked because of simirarity of grammar and interest in the same topic as a banned user. My behaviour is in the line of Wikipedia rules. Every acussed person shall have full right to defend himself before any decision about his edit rights. The prosecutor is not the judge. Thank you. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:96.241.218.72&oldid=621480925"