Jump to content

User talk:Doc9871

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Doc9871 (talk | contribs) at 13:57, 30 January 2018 (→‎January 2018: diff). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Missing you

I would like to come back but Chemo brain has left me a space where all the rules used to be, We were a great team the three os us. Thank you for what you said about my son, so true, I miss him horribly. Please email me: [email protected] I have popped in recently, Karel of course LOL. I see much I would like to do. With you retired how can there be joy? — DocOfSoc • Talk • 05:31, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I miss you too! I'll never return, alas. You see, I was railroaded by a little kangaroo court and banned from all post-1932 American political topics. Anything past 1932!!! Why? Because I dared to point out a very serious, totally blatant POV agenda in this supposedly neutral environment. I have no respect for any admin that can't let utter political bullshit cloud their supposed neutrality. I know also that going against the grain is verboten in a culture of fear. The place really sucks for me now. And I'm glad I'm gone. I would never even consider appealing my ludicrous "silencing" sanction. Meh. But I do miss you!!! Cheers :> 68.199.203.77 (talk) 11:07, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Topic ban violations

Your edits today at User talk:Ihardlythinkso and Talk:Donald Trump violate your topic ban. Please don't violate it again or you may be blocked from editing.- MrX 🖋 17:04, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Doc, you're not merely violating your American Politics topic ban but being extremely aggressive with it. If you're trying to commit Suicide by admin, all you have to do is make one more topic ban-violating edit and I'll oblige you with an indefinite block. Bishonen | talk 18:35, 29 January 2018 (UTC).[reply]
    You need to recuse yourself from any decision where your bias prevents you from acting in a way that any un-involved admin would otherwise be objective. How's that sound? Doc talk 10:48, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Just strange. You must have written it rather fast. Bishonen | talk 11:12, 30 January 2018 (UTC).[reply]
    It's certainly quite strange that you, of all admins, would show up to threaten me with an indef for just one more topic ban-violating edit. As if my "disruption" is at the degree of an indef. Take my page off your watch list, please. That also goes for Bishzilla, Bishapod, et. al. Doc talk 11:25, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi Doc, long time no see. While I appreciate the fact that I'm not likely to see another genuinely amusing convo (though it goes off the rails in parts) defending Trump on Wikipedia for the next... probably seven years of his presidency, I'd also prefer not to watch two good editors (even though you've retired for a long time now) receive indef blocks. Bish, please withhold your urge to block for the time being. There must some other topic of interest to you on the encyclopaedia you can amuse yourself with. Pre-1932 U.S. politics if need be. Mr rnddude (talk) 12:30, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi yourself! Yes, "probably seven years of his presidency" is on track with the current state of general hysteria. 90% of mainstream media coverage of Trump is negative. Unheard of. Cheers! Doc talk 12:35, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Bish has my page watched for one reason only. Her claiming to not be involved in regards to me is actually a bit arrogant. As if the status quo wouldn't even question her. In reality, on appeal, it wouldn't hold up. It might even boomerang. Meh. Doc talk 13:02, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at WP:AE#Doc9871

 You are invited to join the discussion at WP:AE#Doc9871. - MrX 🖋 13:40, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Template:Z48[reply]

January 2018

To enforce an arbitration decision and for violation of your topic ban, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. GoldenRing (talk) 13:50, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

I hope that my comment [1] on the Civil Rights Act of 1964 wasn't too "disruptive". Doc talk 13:55, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Doc9871&oldid=823139468"