User talk:Boleyn

User:Boleyn is the same editor as User:Boleyn2 and User:Boleyn3. I used to use the three log-ins to increase my watchlist, but they can now all fit on one.

This editor is a
Master Editor
and is entitled to display this Platinum
Editor Star.

I can not find any sources, I do not know how to edit. Can you please fix it or find it by yourself.

Edinburgh Dungeon

Dear Boleyn, I would be grateful if could help me with some reliable sources as I am currently struggling. Thank You DC. ( DanColmer 15:34, 20 June 2018 (UTC))

Hi, DanColmer, I'm happy to help. Where did you get the information from when you started the article? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 14:42, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Kutumba Gowravam

Dear Boleyn, These are the maximum sources I could find for the this article, I would be greatful if could how reliable soures. Thanking You Dr. B. Bhargava Teja. (B.Bhargava Teja (talk) 13:09, 14 April 2018 (UTC))

(Sungai Besi MRT station)

I'd have my references on MRT Official webpage. https://www.mymrt.com.my/public/travel-with-mrt/ From Unknown152438 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unknown152438 (talk • contribs) 11:59, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Sources provided, thanks for the feedback

Dear Boleyn, thanks for your feedback regarding the article. I've added some sources in the meantime. Feel free to re-evaluate the wiki : [The redone english wiki]. Sources were the same as the dutch variant : [Dutch wiki]

Thank you for reviewing my Township pages for Iredell County, NC

I'm working on the changes and should get them finished this week. Would you be willing to take a look at Chambersburg Township, Iredell County, North Carolina to see if my changes are acceptable? I removed the "cite sources" tag and added more info. Don't know if it's still considered a stub. Thanks a bunch! Eewilson (talk) 14:35, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for taking the time to create so many, Eewilson! Your improvements on this article are impressive, definitely no longer a stub. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 18:02, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Thank you! I am a genealogist working on normalizing locations in my research database, and as I was looking for information about some townships (and other locations) in Iredell Co., I found the articles didn't exist, so I am creating them. Might as well share the love! Thank you for all you do. I will remove the stub tag. Eewilson (talk) 08:35, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Your message on my talk page about ways to improve the article Seth M.R. Jaipuria School, Hardoi

Hi, Boleyn. I'm Aniruddha Mishra .123. I have already given the reference. I didn't understand the notability issue. Can you tell me about it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aniruddha Mishra .123 (talk • contribs) 14:46, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Aniruddha Mishra .123, thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Pages should usually have reliable sources independent of the subject - the one source it has is not independent of the subject, but thanks for now adding it. For a school to be notable, it should meet WP:GNG - so several reliable sources independent of the subject. I wasn't able to find them, but perhaps you or others can. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 14:58, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

About your message of Exit (cupcakKe song)

sorry but I don't know how else to make a page on Wikipedia without it being a draft, don't delete the pages though until I find a way to get the on a seperate page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jusipher (talk • contribs) 06:36, 17 January 2018 (UTC) Hi, Jusipher. The way you created it was fine, it's just that the topic doesn't seem to meet the relevant notability guidelines, WP:NSONG and WP:GNG. It's redirected, so if you have evidence it meets the criteria - for instance charting in a major chart, multiple reviews in good publications - then it can be undone at the click of a button and be a standalone article again. You can continue to work on it at User:Jusipher/sandbox or Draft:Exit (cupcakKe song) also. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 07:05, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Thank you I appreciate it, I'll try to look for more sources, thank you! ~ Jusipher — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jusipher (talk • contribs) 07:11, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

List of Lorne Greene's New Wilderness episodes

It looks like I created this page the wrong way. I cut & pasted the episode list from the Lorne Greene's New Wilderness to the new page. As a result, the edit history isn't showing on the List of episodes page. Is there anyway to fix this? AspenSavannah (talk) 20:40, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello, AspenSavannah, I'm really sorry, I seem to have missed this message. I don't know the answer, but perhaps someone at the WP:TEAHOUSE could help? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 15:57, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Unref template at 2018 Club Atlético River Plate season

Hi Boleyn, I added at least six references in the article, I would like to know when it would be properly to take the unref template out. FerchuJenson (talk) 20:40, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

I've removed it, thanks for your hard work. Boleyn (talk) 07:01, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Centering one column in a table

Hi Boleyn, may I ask you if there is any way of centering the text in one column the whole way down on Wikipedia, without the need of having to insert the "text-align:center" text on each row? --SportsAficionado (talk) 10:22, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi SportsAficionado, I'm afraid I don't know the answer. Might be worth asking at the WP:TEAHOUSE? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 17:46, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi Boleyn, thank you for your help! Best, SportsAficionado (talk) 17:57, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Robyn Maby for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robyn Maby is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robyn Maby until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joeykai (talk) 22:11, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Punken

I created the page for Punken by Maxo Kream today. I created the page for #Maxo187 yesterday, and I will edit the rest of Punken today. Please do not delete or redirect the article. It will flesh out into a fully formed article soon. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thebush007 (talk • contribs) 23:03, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Ah, I see someone else edited this, Thebush007. If you think it does meet WP:NALBUM or WP:GNG, then you could create an article at [{Draft:Punken]] and submit through WP:AFC when it's ready. Thanks for your hard work, Boleyn (talk) 17:58, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Shafie Ayar

I did give some thought to create-protection when I closed that AFD, but he does seem to be close to the border with regards to notability. On the wrong side at present, but it's possible foreign-language sources might tip the balance in future, so I don't want to make it impossible for a different editor to put something up if notability is ever properly established.
But hey, I'm just one guy - if you want to put it up at WP:RPP for salting I won't object! Yunshui ^雲_水 14:32, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

That makes sense, Yunshui, thanks for looking it over. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 17:56, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Daedalus (Major Deus Ex) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Daedalus (Major Deus Ex). Since you had some involvement with the Daedalus (Major Deus Ex) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 13:55, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, I've recommended deletion at the discussion. Boleyn (talk) 16:41, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

1995–96 FC Basel season

Hallo Boleyn, please do not start an editor war. The Basel team squad is at 1995–96 Joggeli.ch, their results (cup and league) and league tables can be seen at 1995–96 RSSSF, every single game is summarised at Joggeli.ch and futher infos are at fussballstarbasel.ch. The Intertoto Cup is referenced within that article with linguasport (and therefore, is not needed on this page). Further information can be found on FC Basel official site. What more do you want? What else can I put in? I thank you in advance for your positve input. Greetings --Huligan0 (talk) 21:53, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your message, Huligan0. I added an inline tag as when looking at the references/sources section, it lists several sources but they are not inline, except one. It has sources, which is great, but it is very difficult to see which source backs up which piece of information. Are you confused by what I meant by inline? Please see WP:INLINECITE. Please let me know if I can help you further. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 06:47, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Hallo Boleyn, no, I know what is meant, but others don't. I've been writing similar articles here for years, over 60 FC Basel seasons. But I don't agree to the use of such tags. An author spends weeks, hours and hours on end, gathering the info, reading books, searching for inline infos. You're not going to find many inline citations for a football match that was played 20, 50 or 80 years ago. An author spends weeks writing, adding wikilinks, linking sources and references, formating tables. Hurray :-) Finished. Put it on line and within hours somebody adds a tag This article includes a list of references, but its sources remain unclear or then This article needs additional citations for verification or even This article is a Stub or even better, all three at the same time. I know the article is only going to get read five or ten times a month, but if these tags are at the beginning, nobody is going to read it at all. I think that this sort of tag should be on the talk page (perhaps within the references/sources section) but not at the beginning of the article. I don't mean just your tag, but also many, many others. I don't find that these tags are motivating or inspiring, that they are encouaging or helpful. I think that such tags dis-encourage authors and editors. I need positve input, but I'm going to carry on writing anyway. Greetings from Switzerland --Huligan0 (talk) 20:51, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Sorry: but can these tags be added to the talk page? Greetings --Huligan0 (talk) 21:14, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Huligan0, no, they go on the article, so anyone can see the issue and improve it. I think you're overestimating how difficult it is to inline cite. You just add your paragraph of information, then at the end of it write what your source was - same for the next block of information you add. It would only take about two mins before. Without it, it's really unclear what information is verified and what is unverified. Thanks for your hard work on articles. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 21:31, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Boowelikada

You have corrected a page by the same editor. Please help.Xx236 (talk) 09:23, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

I've messaged the editor and will keep an eye on whether they make adjustments. I'll see if I can improve the article myself too. Thanks, Xx236. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 18:07, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

request for deletion of draft for 1911 Milan-San Remo

Hello, Boleyn. This is Lincoln555. I have written in the past a draft for the article 1911 Milan-San Remo. An article version was written by EP111 just today. I would like for my draft to be deleted for being a duplicate. Lincoln555 (talk) 10:40, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Y Boleyn (talk) 16:39, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Edward Lyman Abbott

Thanks for the editing help you gave to Edward Lyman Abbott, several years ago. I have made substantial edits that I thought you might enjoy. Cheers! Flibirigit (talk) 23:05, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Well done, Flibirigit, it's looking really good now. Hope you're well, Boleyn (talk) 16:41, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Chanelle McCleary for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chanelle McCleary is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chanelle McCleary until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 16:03, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Dont't know why Twinkle did this, since looking at the page history you don't seem to be the perp. Regards,TheLongTone (talk) 16:05, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, TheLongTone, I'll comment at the AfD. Notifying ChristmasCrackers, who made my redirect into an article. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 16:19, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Ah, ChristmasCrackers is a blocked sock, never mind. Boleyn (talk) 16:42, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

A blocked sock? sounds painful!TheLongTone (talk) 13:04, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Caesar Bacarella

Hi, It's JRicciMotorsports. I just wanted to tell you that I counldn't find a way to contact you. Also, I have 5 sources on my Caesar Bacarella page.

Thanks, I've responded at your talk page to keep the discussion together. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 13:58, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Mate4Malta

Can you goddamn leave me alone and stop suggesting to block me? I'm a 14 year old kid who's trying to contribute something to Wikipedia, which I already did with a few articles that I have created, such as Sikhism in Poland. I added some citations in them, the rest is YOUR or other Wikipedia editors' job. Please.

Mate4Malta, I'll respond at your talk page to keep the whole discussion together. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 13:59, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Early members of parliament

I have noticed the new page John Penkestone. You say in the lead that he "was an English politician". Please bear in mind that almost none of these early members of parliament was that. Being a member of the House of Commons of England in the 14th, 15th, and 16th centuries was a short-term commitment for a few days or weeks of the year, with a new election held every time a parliament was summoned, and not in itself a career. This man is reported as one of the members for Southampton in 1386, 1394, and 1406, so he was a rather occasional member of parliament, and there is no sign at all that he was a politician, a concept which did not really exist at that time.

The same comment applies to page names. To include the word politician (or the letters MP) in a page name before the 18th century is usually misleading, as most of these men had some other main occupation or status, such as barrister, merchant, courtier, which defines them far better. Moonraker (talk) 04:09, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Thank you, Moonraker, I will bear this in mind and adjust my template. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 13:58, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

A new user still not following the guidelines

Hello Boleyn, this user's still creating reams of messy new articles (lead sections with no context, half-done or wrong dates both inline and in-reference, half-empty tables, no reference sections, etc.) such as 1920 Tour of Flanders, and is continuing to ignore the ones you've already asked them to fix. I'm starting to consider it WP:DIS to my own workflow. As you dealt with it first, would you like to follow up on it? EP111 (talk) 18:32, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, EP111, I've left them a message and will continue to monitor. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 21:23, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. EP111 (talk) 07:04, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

P.s. If they do eventually get taken to WP:ANI, please feel free to notify me. EP111 (talk) 07:30, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Will do, Boleyn (talk) 12:43, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

I initiated an ANI last night, and before I'd got around to messaging you, it had been closed as an indefinite block. You might want to watchlist their talk page if you haven't already, in case they object and there's something you'd like to add. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 07:00, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. I've only just logged on, after 18 hours or so. That was quick, I'll go and take look at what happened. It certainly seemed like a case of WP:CIR, to me. EP111 (talk) 10:54, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Discussion found and read. I've nothing further to add at this point, but offer my thanks to yourself and Swarm for dealing with it and I'll watchlist the user's talk page. EP111 (talk) 11:39, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Ian Allison (disambiguation)

Hi. Thanks for the "heads up".
What I'd like to do is:

1. move Ian Allison to Ian Allison (basketball) - done
2. move Ian Allison (disambiguation) to Ian Allison - needs an admin
3. update Ian Allison (disambiguation) in preparation for move to Ian Allison - done
4. modify the template {{Footer 1936 Olympic Silver Medalists Basketball Men}} - done

and anything else I may have missed. However, I need to be an admin to move Ian Allison (disambiguation) to Ian Allison.
Anyway, what do you suggest? Pdfpdf (talk) 06:46, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

It looks like you've fixed it. Thanks! Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 06:57, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 06:58, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Atsme. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Kaldighi, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

^{Atsme📞📧} 23:32, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Original programs

Can you userfy? -Inowen (talk) 02:07, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

This was deleted before I was next online, but I would have been happy to help. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 14:31, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Joyner v. Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity

Please look at Talk:Joyner v. Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity. Rhadow (talk) 14:27, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. It is now in the mainspace, and you've tagged Joe Decker, so they can look it over and see if they think it's OK to stay there. You can take information from the other draft and add it in at any time. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 14:31, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Boyar Debbarma

Hello, Boleyn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Boyar Debbarma".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 22:10, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I think I probably moved this from mainspace to draft, it's not my creation, so happy for it to be deleted. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 12:38, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Boleyn, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!

The NPP backlog at the end of the drive with the number of unreviewed articles by creation date. Red is older than 90 days, orange is between 90 and 30 days old, and green is younger than 30 days.

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
• We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!

New Year Backlog Drive results:

• We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!

General project update:

• ACTRIAL will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
• Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

User:Arcarius

Hi Boleyn! In view of your past interactions with him, you might be interested in this. Cheers, Constantine ✍ 09:52, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know, Cplakidas, Boleyn (talk) 15:58, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

NPP Backlog Drive Appreciation

		Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		For completing over 1000 reviews (2058) during the 2018 NPP New Year Backlog Drive, please accept this Special Edition Barnstar. Thank you for helping out at New Page Patrol! There is still work to do to meet our long term goals, so I hope you will continue your great work. Cheers! — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 03:34, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

		Asymmetric Epicyclic Gears
		For maintaining a streak of at least 100 reviews per week during the 2018 NPP New Year Backlog drive, you are awarded the asymmetric epicyclic gears. Well done! Keep up the good work. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 03:34, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for all your hard work and good ideas, Insertcleverphrasehere, you're invaluable to the project. Boleyn (talk) 21:48, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Diekirch Women's League

...was consigned to draft space by you last year and has now popped back out in scarcely improved form. One ref but no content; I'd suggest shunting it back? Cheers --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 11:09, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll look it over, Elmidae. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 08:12, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Spirce for Haas VF-18

Sources added Real tlhingan (talk) 21:26, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! Boleyn (talk) 21:47, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

The unresponsive editors

One down! Thank you for warning the user about editing logged out, that was obviously what pushed them into starting to talk. I've unblocked one more, RafaelRL1905, where the back-and-forth was by e-mail. I hope they both become constructive contributors now — they obviously mean well. Bishonen | talk 07:47, 12 February 2018 (UTC).

Thanks, I think many of them just think that the messages indicate a difference of opinion and don't properly read the messages. Language and culture seem to be big issues too - after a poor attempt at editing Latin Wikipedia, I have some sympathy. Thanks for taking the time to unblock them. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 08:10, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Tenor (website)

Hello, can you please review this new page.--Joseph 14:14, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi, 991joseph, I'm just back online and it looks like this was done. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 20:21, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Yes, it's done. Thank you!--Joseph 03:02, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Šljivovica (disambiguation)

Hello, Boleyn. Thanks for the notice. I created the article and added some links. Is it better now? Super Ψ Dro 15:18, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

==  Proposed deletion of Bek (family) ==

The article Bek (family) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Article protection

Hey Boleyn, is there any chance to protect the article of AC Omonia's, as I noticed there are some kind of vandalism from users using their IP address. Thanks, Nick Rokk 96 (talk) 20:01, 1 March 2018 (BST)

Hi, Nick Rokk 96, I hope you're well. I'm not an admin so can't help you personally, but I've looked it over, and I would suggest you ask for it to be protected at WP:RPP. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 20:01, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Thank you

I am grateful for your kind post at my WP:AN#Topic ban appeal. Your words of support for my return to editing dabs are much appreciated. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 01:43, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

No problem, we all deserve a second chance with things. Boleyn (talk) 15:21, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Re: sources (Valentina Bergamaschi bio)

Ok, I know, the sources are all in the it.wiki article, so because but since I find it rather difficult to write in English rather than read it, I limited myself to creating a definitely encyclopedic bio stub (it is for us in it.wiki that we are much more restrictive than you in en.wiki ...). As you probably understand I'll write you these two lines with the help of Saint Google Translator while I'm continuing to fix the hundreds of rumors about women's football in my native language. In conclusion, I try to import some source in Italian, hoping that for you in en.wiki are sufficient, because I would be sorry to be put in obliteration due to lack of sources even if I can not pretend that you can do it (being admin in it. wiki I know how things work). Sorry again for the use of the translator or I would have spent much more time writing this message. Ciao :-) --Threecharlie (talk) 09:24, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

I forgot, if you go in the entry it.wiki of Bergamaschi you will notice that in it.wiki for a while 'we have implemented a semi-automatic system that imports wikidata external links, if you could promote this practice in en.wiki many bio they would be automatically enriched at least by giving a little more authoritativeness and reassuring the patrollers about its verifiability. Thanks again for your patience.--Threecharlie (talk) 09:31, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

I translated part of the bio from it.wiki but I assume that he made several mistakes, you do me the courtesy of wikify that? Thakns :-) --Threecharlie (talk) 10:06, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

This looks much better now. If it has no sources, we have no idea if the information is correct or made up, but now it seems much clearer. Thanks for your work on the article, Threecharlie, Boleyn (talk) 19:59, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Double tag?

See [1], thanks! Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 11:47, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Reverted it, thanks :) Boleyn (talk) 15:22, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for all your great review work. You appear on my watchlist pretty much every day and I'd never taken the opportunity to say thanks :) Dr. Vogel (talk) 17:23, 11 March 2018 (UTC):Thanks, DrVogel, I really appreciate you taking the time to send me this message. Your work is much valued too. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 06:18, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

WP:Communication?

Hi i don't understand what does this message mean. Can you please explain it? What messages should i reply? Is List of libraries only problem?

Please be aware that WP:Communication is required on WIkipedia. Please respond to my previous messages. You may also want to see WP:SourceList, WP:BURDEN and WP:V. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 19:44, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Can you please respond? By refusing to communicate with an editor raising a concern, you are risking a block. Boleyn (talk) 09:04, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Best regards. --Rt788 (talk) 05:46, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

If you look at your talk page, you will see I have sent you four messages; thanks for finally responding. See User talk:Rt788#Ways to improve List of libraries in Azerbaijan and User talk:Rt788#Sources and communication. Yes, they are about a library list - just read them over. You do have other articles, like Stone Chronicle Museum, where other editors have raised concerns about your referencing, but I have just contacted you about the list I linked to in my message, List of libraries in Azerbaijan. Please add your sources. Boleyn (talk) 06:14, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

New page review requested

Hi am requesting if you could review Mulenga Kapwepwe for me. Thank you Chabota Kanguya (talk) 07:58, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

This isn't the type of page I tend to patrol, but don't worry, the backlog's not too bad at the moment. Boleyn (talk) 14:55, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi Boleyn!

Hello, Boleyn. You have new messages at Kmw2700's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 14:55, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Seo Hoon

Hi Boleyn, Please check the reference and remove the notice. Thank you for your reminder. Goodtiming8871 (talk) 08:44, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. You are able to remove a prod yourself, and an unref tag, but I've now removed them. Thanks for finishing the article off. Boleyn (talk) 14:54, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

NPL pages

Boleyn, I think maybe we should the delete the season pages of the NPL, because maybe it will take too long to to make them all and for other reasons.

FastCube (talk) 06:07, 14 March 2018 (UTC)FastCube

Hi FastCube, I wouldn't worry about whether it would take a long time to make them all, there's no deadline. I've created thousands of articles on English MPs, but there are many thousands more waiting, redlinked for now. They'll get done eventually. If you don't think they meet WP:NSEASONS then it's worth tagging them for deletion but otherwise they just need to have it in the article which source you got your information from. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 18:03, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Story of Lee Hee-beom.

Because need to know how to create a story about Lee Hee-beom as President of the Pyeongchang Organizing Committee for XXIII Olympic Winter Games in Pyeongchang 2018 in South Korea. I just put in the reference. A Chris80 (talk) 21:09, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 08:28, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

2018 Terengganu F.C. II season

Sorry for late response. References been added into that page. Thanks.

How to improve page references

Hello there. May I have some tips to improve the pages I have created. Thanks.

Hello, Qifahs17. The way you've added sources to 2018 Terengganu F.C. II season is absolutely fine. Please just do that for the other pages I sent you messages about. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 08:19, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

categories

How can I add categories to River Eresma? There is no option under insert!! 2Joules (talk) 08:22, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi, 2Joules. I went to edit and typed two into the bottom of the article. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 08:27, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Your message to List of awards and nominations received by Peter Gabriel

First, I put the content which was from the Peter Gabriel article before. Second, if you click on the links, for example the nomination for British Album you find the information in the wikipedia article behind. Third, I put the Grammy, AMA, Brits, MTV Video Music Awards, Oscar, Golden Globe sources as External Links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schorsch.landmann (talk • contribs) 16:02, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Schorsch.landmann, I've replied on your page, so the conversation is all in one place. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 19:57, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

NBA season transactions

I do not know how to make the tables of other transactions because it is complicated. (talk) 20:24, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Kev519, I don't understand your message, I contacted you about references and communication, not tables. Please comment at the ANI. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 20:26, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

szabiao

I'm created page:Fulin Station, and I add external links in this page.I'm so sorry I doesn't send a message to you in few day.Thank you. Szabiao (talk) 05:05, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Szabiao. It has 'external links' which means 'suggestions for further reading' but it doesn't say what your sources were. Are they the same? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 11:00, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

2018 Bangkok United F.C. season

I've created page 2018 Bangkok United F.C. season and I will add references soon. I'm sorry that I haven't replied your messages. Please let me know when I make errors. Thanks JTheBest (talk) 07:21, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, J. Boleyn (talk) 18:05, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Sources from List of awards and nominations received by Peter Gabriel

Now most of the sources have been put into correct citation I guess. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schorsch.landmann (talk • contribs) 11:48, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 12:26, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

21 March, 2018

Hello Friend! I did not understand what are you saying.If there is my mistake on the article of Khanian Village, So please remove it. Thanks You.Regards; User:Shoaib74444 (talk) 09:45 21 March,2018(UTC)

I have replied at your talk page to keep the conversation together. Boleyn (talk) 07:08, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

23 March, 2018

Hi, thank you for reviewing my 2018 New York Cosmos season article. Now I just need to know what that means lol. Does that mean it now has protection against being deleted? If so, thank you again! lol

User:Tychu9 (talk) 22:04 23 March 2018(UTC)

Hi Tychu9. It means it is accepted in the mainspace and can be indexed by Google. It doesn't mean that an article can't be later judged not to meet WP:NSEASON or WP:GNG, but it means I didn't see any major issues with it being in Wikipedia. Thanks for creating it, Boleyn (talk) 07:08, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Re: Sources

Hi, about your message on my talk page, I haven't put anything that needs sources. The current season is about to end, and mathematically, only 5 teams are sure to be in the next season's Ligue 1 (1st League of Tunisia). When I add other information (for example the date on which the season will begin) I will put sources, just like I did for all the articles I created :)
Thank you :)
Alexsd27 (talk) 00:51, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Alexsd27, all articles need to be sourced and thus has lots of information which is unverified. It details which teams have already qualified, that this is the 93rd season, stadium capacity for those who have already qualified and other facts. Where did you get all that information from? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 07:11, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Boleyn, 93rd season, source : http://www.rsssf.com/tablest/tunchamp.html and I put the stadium capacity, and since I am from Tunisia, there is a lot I know about football here, but I'll try to add reliable sources. Cheers. Alexsd27 (talk) 21:42, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

thanks!

Hi, thanks for reviewing some of the new articles! You're so fast that you reviewed them while I was still working on them, I'm glad you didn't think they were rubbish haha. Thank you! Dr. Vogel (talk) 21:36, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

I enjoy reviewing them, DrVogel} and thanks for creating them, Boleyn (talk) 18:06, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Claire Maytham

The article Claire Maytham has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of independent notability, failing WP:GNG. Has not played in a fully professional league or in the Olympics, also failing WP:NBASKETBALL and WP:NSPORTS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 03:10, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jo Sarjant

The article Jo Sarjant has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of independent notability, failing WP:GNG. Has not played in a fully professional league or in the Olympics, also failing WP:NBASKETBALL and WP:NSPORTS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 03:11, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Louise Gamman

The article Louise Gamman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of independent notability, failing WP:GNG. Has not played in a fully professional league or in the Olympics, also failing WP:NBASKETBALL and WP:NSPORTS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 03:15, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jane Thackray

The article Jane Thackray has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of independent notability, failing WP:GNG. Has not played in a fully professional league or in the Olympics, also failing WP:NBASKETBALL and WP:NSPORTS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 04:41, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

List of Nostalgia Critic episodes (2018)

Recreated, no improvement in sources at all or writing; just letting you know just in case my G4 is declined (the creation note calls us 'small-minded' for the deletion and unironically uses the term 'making new dialogues'). Nate • (chatter) 19:28, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll keep an eye on it. Boleyn (talk) 05:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft is up; still one-primary sourced and poor. Nate • (chatter) 22:05, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 06:43, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

your 4 basketball articles

I don't think they should be deleted, so I've tried to expand them a little bit and also added some references. If they get taken to AfD I'll be happy to contribute my opinion. Dr. Vogel (talk) 23:24, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, DrVogel, I appreciate that. Boleyn (talk) 05:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

New Page Review Newsletter No.10

Hello Boleyn, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:

• ACTRIAL's six month experiment restricting new page creation to (auto)confirmed users ended on 14 March. As expected, a greatly increased number of unsuitable articles and candidates for deletion are showing up in the feed again, and the backlog has since increased already by ~30%. Please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day.

Paid editing

• Now that ACTRIAL is inoperative pending discussion, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

• The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
• Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies. A further discussion is currently taking place at: Can a subject specific guideline invalidate the General Notability Guideline?

Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled

• While patrolling articles, if you find an editor that is particularly competent at creating quality new articles, and that user has created more than 25 articles (rather than stubs), consider nominating them for the 'Autopatrolled' user right HERE.

News

• The next issue Wikipedia's newspaper The Signpost has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it, including ACTRIAL wrap-up that will be of special interest to New Page Reviewers. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. The Signpost is one of the best ways to stay up date with news and new developments - please consider subscribing to it. All editors of Wikipedia and associated projects are welcome to submit articles on any topic for consideration by the The Signpost's editorial team for the next issue.

---

To opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Richard Houghton (died 1559) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard Houghton (died 1559) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Houghton (died 1559) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 21:42, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

New article Marie Lamont

Thanks for your comment. I've removed the citation to Wikipedia and changed it to a link insteadSusieCEMartin (talk) 13:28, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your hard work, Boleyn (talk) 22:05, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

1952 Yugoslav Cup

Hi Boleyn,

I was on vacation hence the non-response. Please note that I have nothing to do with the 1952 Yugoslav Cup article except for the fact that I had originally made it on 30 January 2018 as a redirect to 1952 Yugoslav First League#Cup.

I too had thought that the external link from RSSSF actually sources the entire article.

Please take this into consideration before threatening me with a block. I had made the redirect as I was trying to help but you should have assumed that anyway because WP:Assume good faith.

Regards,
Tempo21 (talk) 00:07, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for finally responding, Tempo21. You were editing in between me sending each message, so I assumed would have read the messages. I did assume that the page was created in good faith, but continuing to edit but not responding to editors' messages is against policy and a waste of other people's time. Sorry for the original mistake in contacting you; I will look at whether the redirect should be restored. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 08:49, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Thank you. Tempo21 (talk) 21:49, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Stop deleting List of Nostalgia Critic episodes (2018)

Why is there a reason to delete this article? Why?! I don't see any reason! You say there's a lot of mistakes in the writing, and there's none. You say there's always a reason to delete this article, and there's none! All other NC articles have not been deleted constantly, so why is this one doing so? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.71.191.0 (talk) 21:58, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

• Boleyn, I've salted the draft page. Repeatedly cross-space linking it to get around the G4 deletions was particularly obnoxious. Thanks for keeping on top of it! --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:06, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Serious question, how is there a page on every season of Nostalgia Critic episodes? I would say that the main page itself barely qualifies for a page, most of the sources are primary, or don't mention it at all. I am going to have to revisit this on Monday I think... --kelapstick^(bainuu) 22:08, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Ponyo, yes, this has been a particularly difficult one with it being recreated so many times. kelapstick, I think you're right, from a quick glance it looks like they should be deleted/merged to the parent article if they have enough relevant, verified material. 106.71.191.0, please see WP:SCRUTINY and only send messages and edit while logged in. This was found non-notable at an AfD discussion - you don't need to agree but you do need to respect this. Boleyn (talk) 22:10, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

I figured I would let the discussion make it's course throughout the weekend to begin with, and have nominated all the season episodes for deletion, should you be interested in taking part. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 22:28, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

We remember IP it, so you don't have to. GoodDay (talk) 22:31, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For your persistence in contacting and reporting people repeatedly adding unsourced content and articles. Great work :) ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:24, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Premeditated Chaos. It's not the nicest or easiest bit of the work I do, so I really appreciate the appreciation. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 20:05, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

		The Reviewer Barnstar
		This is for the reviewing new articles in Wikipedia. Thank you. PATH SLOPU (Talk) 05:52, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Reviewing articles

Hi, Greetings, Sir, please review some articles which I have created. Kollam Orthodox Diocese, Adoor Kadampanad Orthodox Diocese, Kottayam Orthodox Diocese, Thumpamon Orthodox Diocese, Kottayam Central Orthodox Diocese, Kochi Orthodox Diocese.--PATH SLOPU ^(Talk) 06:03, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Done, thanks for your hard work creating these. Boleyn (talk) 06:52, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Radio Lebanon

Thanks for your interest and your comments. I have now incorporated two links about the station. One is from a major French language daily called L'Orient-Le Jour here on the 80th anniversary of the station in French https://www.lorientlejour.com/article/1066364/les-80-ans-de-radio-liban-que-reste-t-il-de-la-periode-doree-.html and extensive coverage of various aspects of Radio Lebanon Radio Liban again in French on Liban Vision site here http://www.libanvision.com/radio-liban96.2.htm with a compilation of a great number of articles about the station. These have now been incorporated in the Wikipedia article. werldwayd (talk) 04:18, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for that, and thanks again for creating the article. Boleyn (talk) 06:32, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia Manual

Hi could you please kindly contact me via my Email address: [email protected] regarding Refernces i can only provide persian language links to what i refer here. is that suffice? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khakestary1363 (talk • contribs) 08:28, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi Khakestary1363, Persian language links are OK. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 09:23, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi there. I added the citation. would be glad to receive comments if any. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khakestary1363 (talk • contribs) 10:56, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 11:14, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Marty Farina and other hoax baseball articles.

You don't need to AFD them. Speedy deletion aka G3 is how to nominate it. Which I just did for 4 articles all created by the same editor. When I do something like this, I go to an administrator talkpage (Acroterion or MilborneOne are my usual choices) and ask them to care of this. Just letting you know. Cheers!...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:21, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, WilliamJE, I speedy for hoaxes but thought this was just non-notable rather than a hoax. I'm glad it's been sorted, thanks for your help. Boleyn (talk) 18:12, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Huinnyeoul Culture Village

I added categories about Huinnyeoul Culture Village. Please check it again. Thanks!!! :) --Yeoncong323 (talk) 14:08, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, I've removed the uncategorised tag. Thanks for your hard work, Yeoncong323. Boleyn (talk) 18:11, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Touring Car World/ Source

Hi Boleyn i'm sorry for not putting immediately source. I started since few weeks to add news and not im not yet used to wiki pages. I don't do on purpose. By the way all news i write about touring car championship come from my old books TOURING CAR WORLD published by EDIEMME and written by Ravaioli Fabio - Morandi Fernando

Thanks for your reply, it takes a while to learn everything about how to edit (there are lots of things I still don't know!) Just add the information above to the articles, preferably with a page number. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 18:10, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Natureium. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, John R. McDonald, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Natureium (talk) 16:44, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Unfortunately the system decided I need to notify the reviewer of any article I unreview. I PROD'd it, but didn't mark it as patrolled because if someone removes the PROD it will still be reviewed, but the other issues won't be fixed. Natureium (talk) 16:46, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

i think there is a way around it, Natureium, but I don't know it! When I review an article marked for deletion (and agree with the proposed deletion), I review it to remove it from the backlog and watchlist it, so I will take it to AfD if the prod/speedy is unsuccessful. It doesn't much matter though. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 18:09, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		Whenever I notice the backlog take a steep dive, and I check the global log, it always seems to be because of your great work. Thanks very much. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 20:21, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Insertcleverphrasehere. I've done a lot of reviewing the last few days, and it being noticed helps me keep going. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 20:02, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Not kidding! 854 in a week! Can I give you another one of these? — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 04:00, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks :) Boleyn (talk) 06:51, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer's Osmium Star

		The New Page Reviewer's Osmium Award
		For over 15,000 reviews completed in a single year. As a real asset to the team, your incredible review count has required that I expand the award tiers upward and gift you the first and only (so far) Osmium star. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 20:53, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Thank you, much appreciated :) Boleyn (talk) 20:01, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Jenny Ohlsson

Hi Boleyn. Thank you for curating the article. While it might be true that the article could use more sources it is not very helpful to complain about there not being enough sources, but not stating which secions need to be further sourced. The article conatains 3 references, what's not referenced is her education. This can be found on LinedIn for example. There seem to be no additional sources available, so I cannot understand the "stub" reference. If there were more sources available the article would be longer and had more detail. So what's the point? Regards, --Gereon K. (talk) 15:44, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Gereon K.. I added the {refimprove} tag because it has two sources and an external link, but it doesn't add up to 'multiple, independent sources'. One of the two references is a primary source. As ambassadors aren't de facto notable, there is a chance this could be tagged for deletion. The 'stub' tag indicates that the article is short. It's not necessarily a problem, hopefully over time it will increase. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 15:46, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Your Message on citing the source on my Mehal Meda town Page.

Hi, Boleyn. I appreciate the effort to review my page and glad that you worry for the accuracy of the information. For the existence of the town I already give the sources which can be seen on the links and the secondary source was Google map to determine the location. Apart from that I was born in this town. One day I was searching for my town on Wikipedia and couldn't find it. Then I started to search for information on wiki about the neighboring cities and provinces. For example the town Mehal meda is listed as the administrative center of the province over here I just provided the detail. As I am from there. So my sources are mainly Wikipedia and Google map.

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abbel1123 (talk • contribs) 16:31, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi Abbel1123, thanks for getting back to me so quickly. It's amazing how many towns still don't have articles, thank you so much for taking the time to create this one. Your information is likely to be right, but for the encyclopaedia article, we need to be sure there is no WP:OR (original research) and Wikipedia cannot be used as a source itself, because anyone could have edited the information, and may or may not have written where they had got the information. This article does need clear sources in it; it should aim to have multiple, independent sources. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 16:59, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

References

Capsa (Roman colonia)

Hi Boleyn... don't think we've ever interacted, so nice job on the NPP... Question though, you did a review of the above article, which seems to simply be the historical name for Gafsa. While that article is a bit fleshed out, it doesn't seem to warrant a split for this historical period. I had reverted the redirect, and suggested the editor expand the section on the target article, but they have indicated that they prefer a standalone article. Any thoughts? Thanks. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:44, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for contacting me, I've started a merge discussion, please join in. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 18:34, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Deletion reason for Rovshan Muradov

Dear Boleyn, Thanks for your comment. I changed "external links" to Sources. Please let me know if I need to do any other changes for not deletion. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emmmka (talk • contribs) 13:57, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

I found this on my talk page but it is really addressed to you. For your information, I nominated an article of this name for speedy deletion for G11 and G12 on 23rd January, and it must have been deleted. This version may not be identical, but I do remember the image. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:25, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know, Cwmhiraeth} and I've left a message at Emmmka's page. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 18:34, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Keep it up!

I'm sorry I didn't get to contribute to this recent AN/I report before it closed. I've overlapped with you on 'problem user' talk pages a number of times and I've always thought that you've found a good balance between persistence and patience :)

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For all of your efforts in making sure Wikipedia articles are referenced. Nzd (talk) 00:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Nzd, it was great to get your message when I was feeling a bit bruised by that discussion. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 07:30, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

well done

Hi, I just read an ANI thread where you got criticised for doing a great job at NPP. I was appalled, particularly because it sounded to me like somebody was trying to imply that you consider yourself the centre of the world and that you only started the thread because you felt offended that the user in question was ignoring you. Nobody put it in that many words, but it sounded like that, and I didn't appreciate it. Well done for standing your ground and please carry on doing the great work you're doing. Dr. Vogel (talk) 00:35, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your message, DrVogel. That did seem to be the interpretation, which surprised me after I had initiated so many similar threads which had gone very differently. I can't say I wasn't hurt by it, so appreciate you taking the time to contact me. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 07:29, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

User:Laossaurus

You might be interested in this, if you haven't seen it yet. Basically, it's pretty certain we had this editor (and their particular brand of headaches) before. I would not assume that any stubs they produce will see sourcing. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 14:34, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know, Elmidae, I'm glad the situation's sorted, for now at least. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 07:59, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

당신을 위한 반스타!

	편집자 반스타
	I thank you for your concerning. 칼빈500 (talk) 02:56, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, 칼빈500. Boleyn (talk) 08:02, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Mazepa (film)

Hello! You can change title of article on "Mazeppa (film)"? Nikolai Kurbatov (talk) 05:23, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Yes, Nikolai Kurbatov, I can or it can be requested at WP:RM. What do you think it should be changed to? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 08:01, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Anaxial. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Jayden cole, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Anaxial (talk) 19:58, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Banned

I received your 3 alerts suggesting that I improve articles I created. Please check my talk page where you will find that I am currently banned from working on school articles, "broadly construed". Jzsj (talk) 22:55, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for alerting me, Jzsj. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 06:50, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of Sam Chui page

it is not realted to it's promotion . In wikipedia we found many of the big film actors amd singers or big personality have their article. So we couldn't say like that we are promoting that actors . So in that case we say like we are providing information about that Actor so like that same way samChui also has a big place in aviation sector he is a common man but he is in great place of aviation. So through this article all who wants to know more about him can get a knowledge about him. So thereby i am strongly opposing the deletion of this page. For information this page is not related to any of his promotion it is related about his information to the people, do you find anything in this whole article which is describing to follow him on social media? because this article was created for information not for promotion, Regards I kindly request you to retrieve that article back to Wikipedia Vnk414 (talk) 02:02, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Vnk414. I can't re-instate your article, as I am not an admin, and it was not my final say on whether it was deleted. However, you could re-create the article and submit it via WP:AFC. It read in a very promotional tone, and from your message above I'm guessing there is a WP:COI. If you think he really meets WP:ENT or WP:GNG, then WP:AFC is a good route to re-creation. There you will get advice as well. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 08:39, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

In the deletion tag it was mentioned that the same article can be retrieve by the one who has started that deletion process, is my article now restrictions free Vnk414 (talk) 09:02, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Concerns on Legal High(Japanese TV series)

Dear Boleyn,

Thank you for the review and concerns about the source of this wikipedia page "Legal High(Japanese TV series)" , I will try to get on with the sources when I have time. I took down one of the tags, since both tags are the same, so I just kept the newer one that you put on! Thanks!!!

Sincerely,

Timmy78722 (talk) 08:34, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Timmy78722. Boleyn (talk) 08:35, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Sources

Have added sources to article Morgan Morris. Apologies for lack of reply.

Thanks you, Harriesss. Boleyn (talk) 10:48, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Réunion

Just to let you know, I added a source on the page Reunion. Fixer88 (talk) 20:19, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Fixer88. Boleyn (talk) 20:22, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Publius Cornelius Maluginensis Scipio

Sorry for delays, I didn’t know how to contact you. Do I need to add citations and categories to the articles:

• Publius Cornelius Maluginensis Scipio
• Scribonius (Bosporan usurper)
• Gaius Sulpicius Galba (consul 5 BC)

Who knew making Wikipedia articles was so hard? Jasgray04 (talk) 23:50, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Sorry you've doun it hard, Jasgray04, but I'm sure you'll get the hang of it quickly, you have written some good pages! Yes, citations are needed. When you're knew, if you're really unsure about categories, you can tag it as {{uncat} or leave them, but sources are the important thing. Thanks for responding - if you need any more help, please feel free to contact me or ask at the WP:TEAHOUSE. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 06:49, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Shall I quit my contribution.

Thanks for being rude. I follow Christianity which teaches us to be humble. And you won't understand it. Mansukhsurin (talk) 09:04, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) @Mansukhsurin: Where do you consider that Boleyn has been rude? Please show us, before rudely accusing her of being rude. All of us here follow the rules of Wikipedia, regardless of whether we also follow any religion. These include communicating with other editors, replying to posts on talk pages, adding reliable sources for everything we add to the encyclopedia, and so on. PamD 09:35, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Rules don't necessarily make any one a perfect person.

Being on wikipedia is not a full time profession of mine like you. If I can quit other social networking sites like the most popular One the face book I can stop being here also. Following rules could not make the present billionaire like Bill Gates or any other successful entrepreneur or happy person. Some times My articles might not fullfil the criteria as for that time but surely that doesn't makes it irrelevant or something that people do not want to read or know about. Any way It has it has hurted me. And you on the other side being a robot you can't understand what are emotions. Thank you very much for making me realize that One shouldn't do charity or any thing for free else people will surely point out mistakes. Neither they will appreciate nor they will encourage. Rightly said "It is better to idle then to show your skill even for free. Thanks Bolen. Mansukhsurin (talk) 14:59, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi Mansukhsurin, can I just ask you, if you don't mind please, do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia? Dr. Vogel (talk) 15:11, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Mansukhsurin, I have just repeatedly tried to start a conversation with you about some of your creations, so we can work together to improve them. Sources are really important in articles, and I was trying to discuss that - it's a shame you seem to have taken that so much to heart and felt offended by it. Please, instead of making unsubstantiated claims that I am 'rude' or 'a robot', can you please just discuss with me where you got the information? I am happy to help add the sources to the articles, or offer any advice you need. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 17:22, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

2011–12 CR Belouizdad season

Thanks for reminding me Now I am working on it in the next two days, I will put sources, Currently there is one source I put it down External links All results are there, Hichem algerino (talk) 22:46, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Hichem algerino. 'External links' just means 'suggestions for further reading' and doesn't indicate that it was used as a source. External links sections are useful additions, but it's important that there are clear sources in the article. Thanks for creating this, Boleyn (talk) 08:00, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Message on talk page

Thanks for the reminder about Arisaig Provincial Park, I didn't have time to edit immediately after creating the article. I'll try to fix it up a bit in the coming days. Ultimograph5 (talk) 23:22, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Ultimograph5. Boleyn (talk) 16:25, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Rafael Eitan Mekif Ramat Gan High School

Hi Boleyn. Does this article meets Wikipedia's Notability guideline? What do you think? Regards, יוניון ג'ק (talk) 06:44, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi יוניון ג'ק. I would say it probably does (nearly all high schools do, see WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES) but it needs multiple, independent sources to make that clear. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 16:26, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

And if there are no multiple, independent sources? יוניון ג'ק (talk) 16:52, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Then it probably wouldn't meet the criteria - it does need to meet the criteria at either WP:ORG or WP:GNG. Schools will usually have it through local newspapers, books etc. There's usually enough coverage, but not necessarily easily acceptable. I've never seen a high school deleted at AfD though. Boleyn (talk) 17:14, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Sariya/Suriya

Hi, I noticed that you added a place called Suriya to the Sariya page which I created. I am thinking of creating a separate Suriya page. Do you think it should be it's own page or what about making a joint page? Davidgoodheart (talk) 21:12, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Davidgoodheart. I think both are good options. The Suriya I added is also sometimes written as Sariya, so it would belong on both dabs if there were separate ones. But if there are a few entries, it might still be worth having them separate for the ease of readers. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 05:39, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks Boleyn for your input, and best wishes to you too! Davidgoodheart (talk) 05:49, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

WanBi Tuấn Anh

I had already added all the sources for the page but seem like someone deleted all the sources. Also, he should be called "Tuấn Anh", because in Vietnam, the name "Anh" can be used for both of female and male, it'll make people confuse, I feel annoyed because I had already explained and even left the source but they don't understand -,-
Sorry for my bad grammars. Btw, you can call me "Lam" (Lam) April 25, 2018

Oh, that is strange. I have had a look through and could see earlier sources but not who took them out. At least some of them were unreliable, e.g. Vietnamese Wikipedia can't be used itself as a source, but I don't know enough about the other sources to know if they are reliable or not. Thanks for your message, Boleyn (talk) 05:45, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) @NguyenAnhLam: No-one has removed your sources but you have not formatted them properly as references. I have fixed the first one so that is listed under "References", though it also needs to be given as a proper reference with title, source, date etc and not just the website URL. You can now fix the rest. Please don't accuse an unknown "someone" of damaging your article when you have not taken the trouble to learn how to add references. PamD 06:04, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Regarding article cite sources

Hello Boleyn, Greetings!
In relation to the articles Kan newspapers list and Can newspapers list, I added the tag 'cite sources' to article Ind mags list. But its reverted with a summary as 'not required'. Can you please have a look in to the article. | Thank you, Ganeshprasadkp (talk) 03:58, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for adding citations. Per WP:SourceList, they should have them, lists are still classed as articles. Your tag was right so I've restored it. Thanks again, Boleyn (talk) 09:26, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

When I created that page, I was merely copying down information from other pages. I did not add any new information. --Numberguy6 (talk) 15:33, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for responding, Numberguy6. All articles do need sources, even ones that are similar to list articles, per WP:SourceList. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 15:35, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Roger Mitchell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roger Mitchell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Mitchell (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ansh666 07:19, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm PamD. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Srinivasa Ramanjuan Concept School, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

PamD 12:35, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

I don't think I actually meant to unreview it ... but looking again I see the only "reference" was to Facebook, so I've removed that and sent it to AfD as non-notable. PamD 13:31, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

About the article 1998–99 Saudi First Division

thank you boleyn , I have already given the reference.this is it [2]

Slayym (talk) 13:20, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I know the Papá Soltero page needs some fix-ups. What can I do? Julio P. 06:41, 29 April 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julio Puentes (talk • contribs)

Hi Julio Pentes. It just needs its sources. What was your source for the article? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 06:58, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Response to Koh-Lanta: L'Île au Trésor

Hi, sorry for not responding. I was looking at some sources and wanted to make sure that they were reliable. I can add about two or three (for now) but I don't really know how to use the reference box properly so as of this message, it'll most likely just have the link as its reference. The references are all in French so I'll need help in adding some stuff to indicate that it is in the said language. As you were asking, the external links box was used for the official website but I've failed to (as of yet) find an archive version of the site at the time the season was airing. I meant to use it for the website and not for the references (as of your previous message, I have added a reference box to the article). I intend on adding a challenge and voting history section to the article as well; was doing the former but laptop died along with the work. Thank you for your concerns and by apologies for not responding to you sooner. I hope I can learn and make articles with the right resources required to make these articles have no issues whatsoever. Cheers, have a good day Boleyn. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nintenga (talk • contribs) 21:18, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Nintenga. Boleyn (talk) 21:21, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Onel5969. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Eridu, Florida, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:57, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

My bad - didn't mean to do that. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:58, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

No worries, I accidentally do that all the time :) Boleyn (talk) 16:57, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christopher Willoughby (MP), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dodington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Response to edits

Sorry for the inconvenience I will start fixing all the links and edits

Khaled Sadeq (talk) 01:41, 4 May 2018 (UTC+3)

Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 14:07, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Antwort

I have previously replied. I forgot to put heading so apparently you missed it. Julio P. 01:50, 4 May 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julio Puentes (talk • contribs)

Reply 2

Hello. I hope I didn't come across as rude with my apparent lack of interest to reach out to you. I've been seeing the ways to correct the page and make it follow Wikipedia's guidelines. If anything, you can show me what precisely is wrong with the page. Julio P. 23:09, 5 May 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julio Puentes (talk • contribs)

I've replied at your talk page to keep it all together. Thanks for your message, Boleyn (talk) 06:32, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thanks for that, to warn and understand keep it up, Sincerely Jhoven Sulla (talk) 03:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Jhoven Sulla. Boleyn (talk) 06:33, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Reply 3

I cited iMDb, which apparently I found out is not considered a legitimate source. As for La Union and Avalanche, I thought of being a bit more distinctive approach; namely to make a sort of start of the articles and use them later.Julio P. 04:12, 7 May 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julio Puentes (talk • contribs)

Hi Julio Pentes, thanks for your message. Yes, unfortunately it is an unreliable source, as good a website as it is. Where did you get the information you added to La Union and Avalanche? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 06:30, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Ah yes

I have tried to move that Page to just Palaeotriakis. Glad you noticed.

Reply to talk

Sorry I didn't get a chance to respond earlier. I'm in the process of recreating the pages that were deleted, adding citations to all, I'm quite familiar with how wiki works as I've been editing pages since about 2007.StadiumXIII (talk) 11:11, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Onel5969. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Pablo Goncálvez, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:10, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Sorry about that - misclicked. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:11, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Regarding article cite sources

Hello Boleyn, Greetings!
As per our previous discussion, I had added tag 'cite sources' into this article. But its removed stating as it dosen't imply. Can you please have a look? --Ganeshprasadkp (talk) 15:42, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you Boleyn, for putting the tag back in the article. --Ganeshprasadkp (talk) 05:14, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, happy to help, Boleyn (talk) 05:26, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.11 25 May 2018

Hello Boleyn, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:

• WP:ACREQ has been implemented. The flow at the feed has dropped back to the levels during the trial. However, the backlog is on the rise again so please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day; a backlog approaching 5,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Deletion tags

• Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders. They require your further verification.

Backlog drive:

• A backlog drive will take place from 10 through 20 June. Check out our talk page at WT:NPR for more details. NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

Editathons

• There will be a large increase in the number of editathons in June. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

Paid editing - new policy

• Now that ACTRIAL is ACREQ, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. There is a new global WMF policy that requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

• The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
• Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies.

Not English

• A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, tag as required, then move to draft if they do have potential.

News

• Development is underway by the WMF on upgrades to the New Pages Feed, in particular ORES features that will help to identify COPYVIOs, and more granular options for selecting articles to review.
• The next issue of The Signpost has been published. The newspaper is one of the best ways to stay up to date with news and new developments. between our newsletters.

---

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:34, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Lake Svetloyar

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Zeugma fr, thanks for creating Lake Svetloyar!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 13:31, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Can you please respond? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 05:37, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi Boleyn,

I just added a very rough (average between google translate, bing translate and my own understanding of Russian) translation of the Russian page, which basically is a dump of my draft edit. Hence there is only one ref added out the 3 from the original page. And in Russian, not in English, sorry.

Also, a small side note: you should be a little less dry when asking for an answer... Basically, if I understand, with the "source" template present, the page is not counted, not referenced, and stays in the Special:NewPages. If you'd like it to move out of the list, don't bite, as I don't have the time and bandwidth to do a lot on WP/EN. And yes, 3 weeks is a short time in these circumstances.

--Zeugma fr (talk) 19:43, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Russian sources are absolutely fine, they don't need to be in English. No, articles with an unsourced tag do not remain in the New Pages Feed, my message was sent as I approved the article and it was then available to be indexed by Google and other search engines. As I had taken the move to approve it, I needed to check I'd done the right thing. My response was polite, not bitey, but yes, somewhat dry. Thanks for solving the problem, Boleyn (talk) 18:40, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

2018 Leinster Senior Football Championshp

I need to talk to you on my talk page. Please respond as soon as possible. (Spierce64006 (talk) 16:55, 27 May 2018 (UTC))

I've responded at your page, Spierce64006. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 19:12, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Mos:dabrl listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mos:dabrl. Since you had some involvement with the Mos:dabrl redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 00:32, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know, Godsy. Boleyn (talk) 19:13, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Merchandise Giveaway Nomination - Successful

Hey Boleyn

You have been successfully nominated to receive a free t-shirt from the Wikimedia Foundation through our Merchandise Giveaway program (https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Merchandise_giveaways). Congratulations and thank you for your hard work!

Please email us at merchandisegiveawaywikimedia.org and we will send you full details on how to accept your free shirt.

Thanks! Seddon (WMF) (talk) 00:49, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Seddon (WMF), thanks, that's a lovely surprise! Boleyn (talk) 19:15, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Draft moves

Happy to talk here, but I think this issue raises broader policy issues of interest to the community. (I don't think you're the only person with this practice, by a long shot. I'm genuinely interested in when the community thinks it is okay to move to draft and your edits were quite a few examples I saw in the deletion queue.) Particularly now that promising drafts cannot be saved in draftspace indefinitely, I'm concerned about moves to draftspace under any but the most stringent conditions. Policy currently only seems to permit these moves during new-page patrol, and that limitation makes sense particularly now that moves are effectively a slow-motion speedy-deletion. I think it might be more appropriate to apply {{prod}} than move to draft, because at least the prod categories are more closely monitored. Speedy deletion is not appropriate for articles that "were written by problematic editors, who had refused to engage in discussions about where they had got their information and were possible copyright infringements or WP:OR" (except if the copyvio is blatant, obviously). So I don't see why moves to draftspace should be appropriate... Anyways interested in your feedback, not necessarily limited to the particular articles at issue. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:30, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Bigger policy issue I'll note separately

Part of the problem, in my view, is that there are several silos of editors working in different areas and each silo ends up developing policies and practices that don't all work well together. We have AFC editors that don't like to take a chance on accepting articles (almost any article deleted after AFC acceptance is viewed as a bad accept). We have draftspace maintainers (somewhat overlapping) who don't want to permit promising drafts to hang around. And we have NPP folks that don't want junk in mainspace so move stuff to draft (which ordinarily would seem like a good idea except drafts mostly just end up in the trash bin and therefore the moves are effectively deletes, because of the other two groups of editors). In my view, there is a lot of dysfunction resulting from several systems that don't make much sense in tandem. Unless the goal is to fundamentally expand CSD without really acknowledging it.... Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:30, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for taking the time to respond. I don't tend to move articles to draft very often, which is probably why your examples were from a few months ago, when I was quite new to NPP. Anecdotally, I found most I moved to draft were made into reasonable articles within a short amount of time and moved back. I agree that different projects develop their own ways which does need to be discussed. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 04:38, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Thank you Boleyn as this is my first and all the help is greatly appreciated. Thank you so much. Orangecones (talk) 06:33, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Moving Rajneesh to Osho

Hi boleyn,

I request you to consider moving Rajneesh page to simple osho.

There are already many redirections with the title osho, osho(guru), Osho rajneesh.

He chose his name osho in the end of his life. http://www.osho.com/pdf/Osho_Name_Change_Information.pdf Accesscrawl (talk) 11:46, 10 June 2018 (UTC) Accesscrawl (talk) 11:46, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Accesscrawl, I've looked it over and proposed this move. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 12:07, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

The move request was rejected - you may want to propose it at WP:RM. Boleyn (talk) 05:41, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi Boleyn, can you see this article Mahmoud Zamani Qummi

Kurdistantolive (talk) 21:16, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

It looks good, thanks for writing it. Boleyn (talk) 05:41, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Umang Singhar

Hello Boleyn. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Umang Singhar, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Being a member of a state legislature in India is enough to demonstrate notability. See WP:POLITICIAN. Thank you. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 04:28, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

NPP Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello Boleyn, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.

Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive!

• As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
• Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar: . Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: , , , .
• Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.

---

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Predrag Keros

Hello. I just got message about taking article I started to draft again.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Predrag_Keros

I understand a part about lack of resources. I added some but obviously to few. The problem for me is to find resources in English, since dr. Keros was Croatian and worked in Croatia all his life. Still he managed to discover new body part known in medical circles as Keros classification. That I did ad in resources.

The other part about article being writen as advertisment is a bit odd to me. I put his biography. I have intention to add resources but can they be links to Croatian resources or must they be in English? Please advise me since I admit I am new but still dr. Keros deserves wiki article in English.

One more thing. In your comment you mentioned biography of a living person. I don't know if it changes anything but dr. Keros died this year. Dmajdic (talk) 14:08, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Dmajdic, that wasn't clear in the orignal article. Sources can be in any language, including Croatian. 'External links' just means 'suggestions for further reading'; it needs to be clear what your sources are. Please see WP:INLINECITE to make them clear. The whole article reads as if it is written to promote the person. It just needs work in draftspace, then submitting via WP:AFC preferably. Thanks for your hard work, Boleyn (talk) 15:40, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Thank you Boleyn for your swift reply. I'm trying to include sources now in article but if you read carefuly you will find that article is just an extended biography of realy important (not only localy) doctor and scientist. When I try to find link to confirm everything in his biography I find some pages with his biography that confirm almost everything said in article. So I'm not sure what to do now. I put few links and if you read those pages they confirm almost all that is said here (only in croatian language). For instance: https://hrcak.srce.hr/199866 or https://www.jutarnji.hr/komentari/otisao-je-jedan-od-najvecih-popularizatora-zdravlja-u-hrvatskoj-preminuo-predrag-keros-omiljeni-doktor-kojega-su-cesto-zvali-renesansnim-covjekom/7078233/ Should I do more and what? Dmajdic (talk) 06:56, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) There is an unsourced section about the Keros classification at Cribriform_plate#Keros_classification: it would be useful to expand that, with a source, as this is an aspect of his notability. PamD 07:42, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

wow. Thank you. Didn't know about this one. I'll try to connect it once the article is out of draft. Dmajdic (talk) 07:58, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Benigno Andrade

Hi, and thank you !

I focused on the WP Spanish version of the article (https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benigno_Andrade) , and contrasted it from Carlos Fernández article in the "La Voz de Galicia" article from http://web.archive.org/web/20030306152352/http://www.lavozdegalicia.es:80/inicio/noticia.jsp?TEXTO=100000018773 . There is a copy of the article at this site http://paisajesdelaguerrilla.blogspot.com/2010/04/galicia-vida-y-muerte-de-foucellas.html .

I have edited the article and added the reference. DeepCurl (talk) 18:27, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you, Bolelyn, for your prompt reviewing of Hideo Haga...much appreciated!--Jamesmcardle^(talk) 00:00, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

No problem, Jamesmcardle, thanks for taking the time to write it. Boleyn (talk) 17:14, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

New page reviews

Thank you for reviewing the following new pages :
2018-19 Aizawl F.C. season and 2014-15 Hyderabad C.A. season
-Sagavaj (talk) 15:01, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your hard work, Sagavaj. Boleyn (talk) 15:41, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

References

Yes, I do know that you have sent ten messages of no references, but I see A LOT of football articles with no references and no one does anything about it. I also do actually try to find all the information and include the citations in too.

FastCube (talk) 15:14, 20 June 2018 (UTC)FastCube

Adding citations

Yes, I can add the citations to my articles when I create them. Sorry. I promise I won't ignore your messages again. I do love creating football articles.

FastCube (talk) 15:39, 20 June 2018 (UTC)FastCube

Thanks, FastCube, can you please add your reply at the ANI and add the references to the articles I've contacted you about over the last eight months? I'm glad you enjoy creating the articles. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 15:41, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

----

Sure, if i can find them. I'll definitely start with 2005–06 in Australian soccer

FastCube (talk) 15:45, 20 June 2018 (UTC)FastCube

Kind request to review an article Suggestion

Hi Boleyn, as an autopatrolled user I created an article about an actress called Yashika Aannand and automatically reviewed it. By the time some of the other editors changed the spelling of the actress by moving the article title according to their perspective ideas and also left the article to be unreviewed. Can you please help me in this situation? I hope that you would have known me earlier. Thanks. Abishe (talk) 10:44, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Of course, I'm well aware of your great work and hopefully your creations will be autopatrolled soon. I've done this, happy to help. Boleyn (talk) 11:24, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

@Boleyn: Thanks for your great help by reviewing the article and I will always recognise your contributions to Wikipedia. I once again thank you for your understanding on my efforts. I should mention you that now I have autopatrolled rights and you are one of the reasons to obtain the relevant rights to me. The new page reviewers won't have the necessity to review my articles in the future. Abishe (talk) 11:46, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, I thought I'd put you forward, I now understand why this was not reviewed. Not that reviewing yours ever took long. Keep up the good work! Boleyn (talk) 12:15, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Team From Ministry of Communications and Information Technology (MCIT)

Dear Sir, I am trying to post the bio of Amr Talaat, the ICT Minister of Egypt, but whenever I post it, it is removed by you. Kindly be informed that we are the Ministry of Communications and Information Technology and we need to post the bio of our ICT Minister Amr Talaat. We are responsible for posting this content related to the ICT Minister. Kindly advise us how to fix this problem.

• our MCIT website is http://www.mcit.gov.eg/
• My email is [email protected]
• Amr Talaat the new minister page on wiki is,
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amr_Talaat

Your prompt reply is highly appreciated. Ministry of Communications and Information Technology (MCIT) Boleyn (talk) 01:39, 21 June 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roosh200516 (talk • contribs)

Roosh200516, my only connection with this article appears to have been reviewing it (meaning I agreed it should be indexed by Google). However, you cannot have an article on someone just because you are connected to them, and writing about people you are trying to promote is highly discouraged. It does appear to be on a notable person. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 15:42, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

@Roosh200516: First, your additions to Amr Talaat were removed because they appeared to be copy-pasted from mcit.gov.eg, which would make them copyright violations. If you hold the copyright to that text, or are authorised by the rightsholder to share it, that issue would be solved. Please read WP:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions on how to properly donate your content to Wikipedia.

Second, since you appear to be editing for your employer, you are required by the Terms of Use to disclose this relationship. See WP:DISCLOSEPAY and WP:COIDISCLOSEPAY for instructions and further information.

Finally, I suggest that you familiarise yourself with Wikipedia's other policies, especially WP:BLP. If these are not followed, your contributions to Wikipedia may be removed. BegbertBiggs (talk) 17:03, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

St. John's Cathedral, Nazareth

Johnson.devaraj (talk) 06:35, 22 June 2018 (UTC) Thanks for the tagging. To my article St. John's Cathedral, Nazareth, the sources are from the Cathedral's website, and the Diocesan's website. One another source (Reference) is from a missionary register book (obtained through google books). All these references have been brought under a newly added section called Reference now. Is this sufficient for now for the tag to be removed. Also, I have shared the location of the cathedral using the coordinates feature. This church is a standing witness of my village peoples' spiritual growth and economical development. Hopefully, someone from my village may add a few new references to this article in the coming future Johnson.devaraj (talk) 06:35, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, that's a great improvement. Thanks for taking the time to write this article and help people learn more about the church. Boleyn (talk) 13:40, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Response

Hello, sorry for being a bit lazy, it's just that the whole bureaucracy of Wikipedia can honestly be too much of a hassle at times. --Julio P. 08:51, 25 June 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julio Puentes (talk • contribs)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing Nadir Sedrati, Boleyn.

Unfortunately Kudpung has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Poorly translated or machine translation from fr.Wiki without attribution

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:56, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Today's South Northumberland inquest

Diary found at http://www.northumberland.gov.uk/Registration/Deaths/Funeral.aspx - has published her personal name. You could have easily sourced a reference, but undid my contribution again. 80.234.128.165 (talk) 21:49, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Furthermore, she was once a director of UK company no. 05977993, so cross-reference to name, address and birth date on the record. 80.234.128.165 (talk) 22:32, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

80.234.128.165, the WP:BURDEN is on you to add sources to the information, not anyone else. We have to be especially careful with biographies of living people - sourcing is essential. Boleyn (talk) 11:03, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

For info

Hi. Thanks for reviewing some articles I've just started. However, I think there's an issue with auto-patrol rights. I've started this thread at WP:VPT. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 13:23, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Response

You happy mate? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Editormallu (talk • contribs) 17:16, 29 June 2018 (UTC) how to add sources? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Editormallu (talk • contribs) 04:51, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Sugar Creek Elementary School

Hi! I noticed you had removed some redlinks from a disambiguation pages at Sugar Creek Elementary School.

• Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Disambiguation_pages#Red_links states: "A link to a non-existent article (a "red link") should only be included on a disambiguation page when a linked article (not just other disambiguation pages) also includes that red link. Do not create red links to articles that are unlikely ever to be written, or are likely to be removed as insufficiently notable topics."
• Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Disambiguation_pages#Items_appearing_within_other_articles states "If a topic does not have an article of its own, but is mentioned within another article, then a link to that article should be included." and "If the topic is not mentioned on the other article, that article should not be linked to in the disambiguation page, since linking to it would not help readers find information about the sought topic."

Based on #2, "Sugar Creek Elementary" would certainly be mentioned in the article if/when it's created (as the schools would be listed). As per #1 it does not mean red links are never allowed in articles, but rather only include them if article creation is likely. School districts more or less always survive AFD, so school districts should be treated as "likely to be created".

Anyhow, I am going to create articles on the two entries. WhisperToMe (talk) 02:39, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

I created Community School Corporation of Southern Hancock County. Limestone County Schools and Bentonville Schools received redirects to already existing articles. Note that Sugarcreek (one word) Elementary is mentioned in Karns City Area School District. WhisperToMe (talk) 02:41, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi WhisperToMe, I'm afraid you've misread the guidelines. There needs to be a bluelink on the line and the bluelink needs to mention that particular Sugar Creek Elementary School. A dab is an index of mentions/articles within Wikipedia. I'm glad you're creating the articles. Boleyn (talk) 06:25, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Coto 47

Hi Boleyn! I apologize for not answering before; I havent been as active at Wikipedia for the last seven years or so-even as, like you saw, I still write the occasional airline or boxing related article or general info stub (category which Coto 47 falls, as far as my opinion anyways)

I guess I should put some sources, just have to come around to it! Thanks for your excellent work looking out in that area!

Blessings coming your way! Antonio Rondo Martin (hereeeee's Antonio Martin!!!) 09:06, 30 June, 2018 (UTC)

Thanka, Boleyn (talk) 21:27, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Your curation of Tuluhan Tekelioğlu

Hi! I am wondering if the articles I create have to be curated although I have autopatolled right? The queation is just for my information. Thanks for your comment. CeeGee 20:10, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

H CeeGee. Anyone with autopatrolled rights shouldn't have their articles going through New Page Patrol. However, there seems to have been an issue the last couple of days where those with autopatrolled rights are still going through NPP. It's in hand. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 21:26, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

NPP Backlog Drive Appreciation

		Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		You completed over 500 reviews during the June 2018 Backlog Drive! Awesome work! — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 01:41, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Artikel

Excuse me, but what is it exactly that you want? I've put the necessary references and tried to include as much information as possible on the articles. I really don't know what else to do. Julio P. 04:57, 1 July 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julio Puentes (talk • contribs)

Responded at your talk page to keep the conversation together. Boleyn (talk) 05:39, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Should we remove?

Hi, Boleyn. You see that there are still no citations included with the article, 2005–06 in Australian soccer. That's because I can't find any deaths or retirements in 2005 to 2006 in Australian soccer which should include those references.

I can probably understand why these pages were not yet created after about 12 years since 2005. I think we should just include the template of speedy deletion, because there are still no citations I can find. Or you could have a try at looking for some.

FastCube (talk) 07:19, 2 July 2018 (UTC)FastCube

Hi, FastCube, thanks for your message. Where did you get the information you added to the article? I don't think this is a candidate for deletion, but it does need its sources clear. it's hard for someone else to add in sources later, as the sources should be where the information originally came from. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 10:32, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Re: Ways to improve 2018–19 U.S. Lecce season

OK, thanks. --Freddyballo (talk) 22:53, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Kontakt

Hi Boleyn,

How are you doing? I saw the discussion going on around me. I wanna apologize on my behalf for not communicating well. I understand that articles need to have a proper source, but I always add a source (ex. Soccerway profile of a player) or a link from the official AFC website.

Hope to hear from you soon!

Steel Dogg (talk) 13:37, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Steel Dogg, thanks for replying, I appreciate that. I'm not sure if you realise I've spent hours trying to communicate with you and trying to solve these issues. As I wrote to you, you are creating articles which do not list any clear sources, e.g. [3]. This, as a biography of a living person, should have inline citations, see WP:INLINECITE if you're unsure how to. All it has are 'external links' which means 'suggestions for further reading' but does not tell us what your sources were. If that was your source, you just need to change the heading from 'external links' to 'References' or 'Sources' and the main problem is solved, and it would take only a few more seconds to make these inline citations. The way you have been writing them has not been making the sources clear. If you understand this, please comment at the ANI that you understand this, will do it in future and will respond to messages in future. Best wishes and htanks again for replying, Boleyn (talk) 13:45, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

User:Alfa kanima

So they decided instead of making any attempt to communicate with anyone on their talk page, they'd just blank it instead and add some infoboxes. I left it open to them to be unblocked if they just communicated, but I guess they're not interested. So I'll keep an eye on their page, but I think perhaps we should be on the lookout for socks going forward. Canterbury Tail talk 12:10, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

I saw that, it's a shame. Yes, highly likely to sock, I'll keep an eye out. Thanks for your help, Boleyn (talk) 20:43, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Bruno Abbatini

Dear Boleyn, First thank you very much for your help. I make translations from Hungarian Wikipedia. This page had only one reference, but it comes from Wikidata. Ksanyi (talk) 12:13, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Ksanyi. Boleyn (talk) 06:14, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm John from Idegon. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, B & D Mills, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

John from Idegon (talk) 23:34, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Article Marcos Chamúdez

Hello Boleyn, thank you for reviewing Marcos Chamúdez just now...you were a bit quick...I had only just uploaded it and was adding to it as your messages came suggesting improvements. Can you have another look later please...I'll add categories and more references (having to translate is slowing me down on this). Thank you Jamesmcardle^(talk) 11:36, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, Jamesmcardle, I hadn't realised. It looks really good now. Boleyn (talk) 06:14, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Thank you Boleyn for checking again...I do appreciate your efficiency! Jamesmcardle^(talk) 10:50, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi Boleyn!

Hello Boleyn, thank you for reviewing my new created pages. I notice that you are a very active user, so I wish that you could help me to improve my contributions in the wikipedia. I will stay in touch with you. Greetings. --Lramirez26 (talk) 19:13, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

I' happy to help, Lramirez26. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 06:15, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Giuseppe Maria Feroni

Thank you for your review. I added some more information. Bearian (talk) 16:04, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

ANI

The thing is that I've been editing in Wikia more and editing A-League club pages and that YES I'm trying so hard to look for new citations. I'm looking for maybe a few refs for this article I have been troubleshooting with. I'm doing some really hard research too, but I've found nothing.

I am very sorry for the past month I didn't edit at all and doing it for the ANI.

FastCube (talk) 20:10, 11 July 2018 (UTC)FastCube.

Hi, FastCube, you have been regularly editing over the last month. All we need is for you to add the sources you used while creating the articles - anything more than that is great, but that's what we need. Thanks for responding - I don't think anyone minds when you say you're working on it, but people will mind if they message you several times on an important issue and you don't respond although they can see you've logged on. If you need further help at all, please ask at the best Wikiproject for your topic or at the WP:TEAHOUSE. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 06:43, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing Mayahauri, Boleyn.

Unfortunately Onel5969 has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Sorry, am trying to make a point to this editor about section headers and putting sections in the right place.

To reply, leave a comment on Onel5969's talk page.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:28, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

References

I thought I added references previously. What kind of references do I need? Julio P. 04:29, 12 July 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julio Puentes (talk • contribs)

You have not added references - e.g. look at The Family Man (1979 film), it has a references section, and it is empty. It has 'external links' which just means 'suggestions for further reading, which may or may not have been used to source the article.' The external link in question is to imdb, which is specifically banned at WP:RELIABLESOURCES. Please see Help:Referencing for beginners and ask if you are still unsure. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 06:36, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Removed BLP Prod

I have removed the BLP PROD tag you placed on Fiammetta Venner because the article does have references that refer to the subject. If you feel the article should be deleted, please propose it at WP:AFD. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:52, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Anachronist, I'm glad the creator has now added sources. Thanks for working on it, Boleyn (talk) 19:49, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

re:ANI

Hope you are okay with this edit. Abecedare (talk) 08:06, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

re:Valsain

Hi Boleyn - from time to time, I sometimes add something to Wikipedia when I note that there is not a lemma on the subject where I am looking for - with regard to Valsain, I cannot follow your comments as it does not differ that much from other wikipedia pages on Spanish villages like Mojacar. I have added a source for the inhabitants. With regard to the palace, most of the knowledge comes from the articles which I have added in the bibliography. For other lemmas, I know these places exists like the Podgorica Royal Palace and you can find texts about these places in travel guides and such, but I do not have detailed monographies on them, I just made the lemma as a start because I was looking for it and hopefully other people can also help extending Ipflo —Preceding undated comment added 20:50, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for replying. There are other pages without references, but that doesn't mean we should create more - WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS but we should look to the guidelines, WP:V and the essay WP:BURDEN. You don't need to add lots of references, just add the sources you used while creating the article. Thanks for now adding these, Boleyn (talk) 07:42, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

re: Ways to improve List of units in the New Zealand Cadet Corps

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Zulu uluz, thanks for creating List of units in the New Zealand Cadet Corps!

Hi Boleyn, I have added the reference:

"Chapter 7 – General Composition of the NZCF". Cadet Force Orders (Manual). Vol. Volume 3: Cadet Operations. New Zealand Cadet Forces. {{cite book}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); |volume= has extra text (help)

Zulu uluz (talk) 20:44, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks :) Boleyn (talk) 20:49, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Editing

I really am at a loss as to what exactly I need to add on the pages I created some time ago. You keep insisting that I need to add resources, yet I have done so and the messages to keep doing this continue. Julio P. 03:29, 26 July 2018 (UTC)