User talk:JucheCapitalist

August 2018

Hello, I'm Dirkbb. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Politics of North Korea seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dirkbb (talk) 14:04, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

JucheCapitalist, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi JucheCapitalist! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Your edits

You are trying to change the consensus version of the Juche article. It's your duty to convince others on the talk page of that article rather engage in a back and forth edit war. In addition, it has been explained to you many times that all content needs to follow our rules on reliable sources and neutral point of view. Please familiarize yourself with those rules. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 23:50, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded - we cannot declare NASA photography of North Korea a "100% fake propaganda picture" without some kind of factual basis. GAB^gab 20:48, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Once again. For everything you add, you need to be able to cite a reliable source. This is not a reliable source for anything and does not support any of your additions. Also, don't remove content others have added that is referenced to reliable sources. If you think there is an error in such sources, please point it out on the talk page of the article in question. But don't bother saying everything that reliable sources say is just part of a conspiracy; if you honestly think so, Wikipedia is not a place for you. So far every single one of your edits to articles has been reverted. Now it would be a perfect time to take a break from editing and read our core content policies. If you continue adding unreferenced content and promoting fringe theories, you might get blocked from editing. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 01:02, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is obviously FAKE. If you put a photo from space (like you claim) that actually is a painting, I mean look at it. The coastline can be seen no clouds. You see lights from space? LOL. What is wrong with you guys? Everyone can see its a painting and not a photo from space. I can actually make a difference between anime and a movie. THEN DO NOT PUT it on WIKIPEDIA at ALL. Retards. You need to prove its a photo from space NOT ME. You are claiming its a photo from SPACE even it doesnt look like it at all. ASK NASA if this is a photo. Of course IT IS NOT. Every retard can see this. Facepalm. Sources for something that is SO OBVIOUS are you kidding me?