User talk:Pablomartinez

Boss way you deleted my post..? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Humptysingh110 (talk • contribs) 15:48, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Pablo's Talk Page Comment of the Month

Cat meat

Hello, I from Brazil and you make not only a mistake but get a Xenophobic approach about the consumption of cat meat in my country. We don't eat cat meat, or dish espetinho, is not made of cat, but from a beef cut named Acém one of the cheapest meat cut in the country. The mistook involving your a joke because a slanderous news from the news paper "Jornal do Brasil", how affirm the dish are made with cat meat, about investigation discovery the news paper just make it to sell issues. After the fact, we how are a people how make lot of jokes start to refer the dish as "espetinho de gato" or as "filé miau" (Filet Meow) too because one of the expansive cut of meat have the name "filé" (Filet) mignon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2804:14C:47:83B7:65BA:6D3:CBE6:34 (talk) 21:09, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

March 2018 (Comments below this line)

Hi Pablo. You just reverted my edit of an external link for the Liverpool Rummy page "because it did not appear constructive." Can you help me understand why it was not constructive? Thanks! Bretipedia (talk) 12:23, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello Pablo Ive put back the link Akiga Sai link on the Tip people page now the page for for him has been created. I had jumped the gun before thanks Davidz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dz3 (talk • contribs) 09:49, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello Pablo. The McGill Unversity Archives (MUA) are currently working on this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arvind_Sharma. If it is lacking in any way, it will be fixed in the following week by a member of its staff. Furthermore, we (the MUA) possess Mr Sharma's personal records and citing this unedited material will be done this following week as well. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by James Gobeille (talk • contribs) 19:55, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Pablo you reverted changes to "Sal Pace" page. I cited several respectable sources, like the NyTimes, Boston Globe, Fortune Magazine, 60 Minutes, etc. It appears that the most relevant and newsworthy portions of Pace's career, most notably in regards to his role in marijuana, were not included prior to my edits. Would you reconsider? Nasa5446 (talk) 22:08, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi Pablo! You reverted my change to "digital textile printing" page. If you don't think it was constructive external link, please let me know which would be the better external link for this page? It was the best among the other external links containing everything regarding the subject. Please give me a logical reason for reverting my change. Have you looked at the external link that I suggested by the way? [User:Mr.lavri] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr.lavri (talk • contribs) 01:03, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi Pablo! You reverted my two changes to the Xbox One section of the Games with Gold List of Games page . I added a check mark to two games that have Xbox One X enhancements based on information from this page --> https://www.xbox.com/en-us/games/xbox-one/xbox-one-x-enhanced-list Chuckuykendall (talk) 21:01, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Not constructive? Gene Barge went under the name of Daddy G for years, and even made records using that name (A Night With Daddy G). So I dont get your "not constructive" comment...just trying to help, NEVERMIND — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mareisland03 (talk • contribs) 16:12, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

It was seen as not constructive because there was not any reference to it being true. Feel free to add it back with proper references. - PabloMartinez (talk) 16:44, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi, you just reverted my edit to fix a dead external link for https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Frantz%C3%A9n The dead link refers to the old name (and URL) of the restaurant. As the page states, 'Frantzén, until 2013 Frantzén/Lindeberg', the restaurant has changed names and URL, but the external link was not changed. Please try to click the current (dead) link and then the one I entered in my edit that actually links to the restaurant. I get that a lot of people try to change links to point to their blogs or whatever, but this is a correct edit! Please take 30 seconds to verify that it is so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.174.14.98 (talk) 18:56, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

I think this was mislabeled as a spam post. Sorry about that. Upon review, I believe your edit to be goodfaith. - PabloMartinez (talk) 16:44, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi, you have just reverted my edit [[1]] for 'not appearing to be constructive'. I am not sure what the issue is here, can you please clarify? Cheers, Morana19 (talk) 21:18, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi - The edit reverted was a spelling mistake, which I think was a simple mistake rather than vandalism. Thanks for bringing it up! - PabloMartinez (talk) 16:44, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Dear Pablo (how is that pronounced?), the Isogloss Candy Floss with Burgenland Croation flavour recently has become one of the favourite flavours among Russian linguists. Knowledge of actual trends is a thing you clearly don't have plenty of Best, PH — Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.97.135.53 (talk) 09:49, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi - I'm not quite sure what you're talking about, but you are correct that I do not keep up with Cotton Candy Flavor Trends. - PabloMartinez (talk) 16:44, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

hi. i added a quote from the washington post newspaper and added it the florida legislature wikipedia page. i guess you censor information you don't agree with. hope you fall down some stairs or get hit by a car — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.185.36.1 (talk) 16:25, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your input. Your post did not fit in with a NPOV. Also, thanks for the well-wishes. Nice to know people on both sides are wishing death upon people who they falsely perceive to disagree with them - PabloMartinez (talk) 16:44, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Hey Crucio! 2600:8806:700:7A00:D989:40D0:AA82:4C32 (talk) 20:11, 2 March 2018 (UTC)Bellatrix Black

References

Hey did you at least read my edit? It highlighted the dangers of terrorism in Uganda and truly exemplified my extensive knowledge on the subject. I got all of my information off of the extremely scholarly sources of Reddit and 4chan. I am a professor of Memeology and Dank Engineering at the University of Green Hills Zone. Please consider this information and in the future think about your reverts before you take action. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Casfdjk (talk • contribs) 20:30, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

User page blanking

When an editor (whether registered or an IP) blanks their talk page, please don't restore it unless it violates the few conditions listed at WP:BLANKING (e.g. declined unblock requests on current sanctions, shared IP headers). This is explained in further detail at WP:DRC. Thanks! --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:06, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Pablomartinez. You reverted an edit I made to The Flintstones episode #77. The maid's name is not "Lola Brigida" as I saw it originally on wikipedia. The maid's name is spelled "Lollobrickida". I have the DVD and am looking at the animated spelling of the name now. I made an edit to correct the maid's name to "Lollobrickida", and you commented that you felt my edit was not "constructive". I'm not sure what you mean when you say my edit is not "constructive". Would you care to explain?50.47.137.217 (talk) 20:50, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:MigenMemelli and 3RR on adding trivia to article. Matthew_hk tc 22:49, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

John F. Keenan update

Hi Pablomartinez, I was hoping you could re-revert the source I just added to Keenan - or let me know what you saw wrong with the content, as I thought it was pretty generic senator info. I'm about to add some other newspapers as well, but don't want to continue if you'll be reverting things :) Thanks! 71.184.101.212 (talk) 17:53, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Your use of Huggle

Please do not use Huggle inappropriately. Of course the addition you refer to was appropriate. My god -- have you not read the prominent NY Times article on this? Or noted that of course the person is notable - he has a wp article? If you misuse tools, you should be aware you can lose them. Please take this as a low-level warning. --2604:2000:E016:A700:A8E0:8ADB:D938:B53B (talk) 21:33, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your feedback. You mistake my reverts (and undoubtedly many others') as "misuse". Your edits were non-constructive in my opinion. I'm confident I'm not alone. You mention this person is notable, however, they are not notable for being accused of sexual harassment. Your edits reflect that you think their primary notability is for being accused of sexual harassment. I'm okay with you disagreeing. I would argue it seems you have agenda. - PabloMartinez (talk) 21:43, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

First -- you write "undoubtedly many others." I'm curious how you can make such a hostile assertion. It is false. "Undoubtedly"!!! How aggressive and baseless. I am insulted by it. In doing so, you fail to assume good faith. You also take a haughty, all-knowing, sneering approach. How is that an effort on your part to communicate properly? And build a collaborative encyclopedia? It is totally improper. Second - if you are going to use Huggle, you have to use the tool properly. You can't use "IDONTLIKEIT" as your standard. You can't say "in my opinion your edit was non-constructive," when a reasonable person would say otherwise.

Obviously, the person is notable -- and they belong on that list, because it is a list of people with that name. So as to you in a series of deletions deleting the person from the list, you were clearly and totally out of line. And using Huggle to do that. That is wrong. I'm happy to bring in admins to discuss this if you like - but this is just the sort of behavior that leads to people losing tools.

Plus - as Huggle is an anti-vandalism tool. How in the world do you defend your wholesale removal of a person from a list of names, when their name matches the list -- as vandalism! Seriously? You are abusing the anti-vandalism tool. You should not be using it if you think that is ok. If you disagree, we need the Huggle admins here to discuss.

In addition, just as with many people swept up in the METOO movement, this person is notable for multiple reasons now. When your full-blown NYT article devoted to you is primarily about you having been accused of sexual harassment by 18 people, and you are put on leave pending an investigation and resign while denying charges, then .. umm .. that is a significant part of your notability. The NYT was not writing an article about some class he taught or book he wrote - just because you dislike it, you don't get to use tools to delete people from lists they belong on, or the part of their notability that you dislike.

My agenda here? I hate editing by editors who seek to hide the aspect of a notable person's background that is the one the NYT chooses to write a full-blown article about. That is what you are doing. It is not right.

And doing it with tools? Completely wrong. If you disagree, let's call in the Huggle approval admins to discuss.--2604:2000:E016:A700:A8E0:8ADB:D938:B53B (talk) 21:58, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure you're much more passionate about this than me. At least daily someone thinks that reverting an edit means I have an agenda. Have you read my "comment of the month" at the top of the page? The person somehow got the impression that I had strong feelings about cat meat because I reverted a nonsensical edit to a page. So I'm glad you're passionate about something more that cat meat. - PabloMartinez (talk) 22:07, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Your write that at least daily someone think that by your edits you are showing that you have an agenda. You may, to gain perspective, want to watch the movie Lucky Number Slevin. It is enjoyable. But more importantly for you, it has this quote: "The first time someone calls you a horse, punch him on the nose. The second time someone calls you a horse, call him a jerk. But the third time someone calls you a horse, well then, perhaps it's time to go shopping for a saddle."--2604:2000:E016:A700:A8E0:8ADB:D938:B53B (talk) 23:31, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

No, I haven't read it .. I've been too busy reading and responding to your other writing. Is it fiction, as well? (I do like sticking to the rules .. grammar included .. if I may be so bold, that would be "than I."

But when someone deletes a notable person completely from a list of notable people on which that person belongs, and uses an anti-vandalism tool to do it, and then actually defends their use of the anti-vandalism tool as proper .. why, yes, it does catch my attention. If it is not an agenda, it remains very poor judgement in use of tools. And improper. My "agenda" - as you put it - is to call out such improper editing, especially when the editor continues to think its great anti-vandalism editing. They are harming wikipedia if they do that. It may start with cats and lists of notable people, but who knows what else they will edit improperly as vandalism.

To make it clearer, though it should be clearer -- if you look at the list of people named Adolph, you find "Adolf Eichmann, German/Austrian, Nazi-German war criminal and organizer of the Holocaust (1906–1962)"

You can not wholly delete that entry as vandalism -- which is what you did with a string of similar entries of other notable people. Because you feel it is not appropriate. He certainly belongs on the list, in the first case. He is notable. And Adolph is his name. Also, the description relates directly to his notability .. we don't say "Adolph E, government official."- (talk) 22:16, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Once you invoke Godwin's Law, you lose all credibility. Please quit posting on my page. If you feel I need reported, find somewhere to report me. - PabloMartinez (talk) 14:12, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

I'm happy to report you, and apologies for posting here to ask where - as you again just now used tools to assert vandalism for my adding the years of birth and death and details to the listing of a person here. This is, yet again, improper use of tools. How can you possibly think for a moment that is vandalism? And proper use of vandal-fighting tools? 2604:2000:E016:A700:B49B:7B31:1E5:3777 (talk) 19:13, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Again, please quit harrassing me on my talk page. I've obviously bothered you, but stalking will not help. - PabloMartinez (talk) 19:16, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Pablomartinez, out of curiousity, why did you revert the two edits in question? They look helpful and you reverted without an edit summary.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:18, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Ponyo, Which two are you referring to? I'm usually very good about documenting my reverts. - PabloMartinez (talk) 19:23, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

The two the IP asked you about above (specifically here).--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:26, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Failing to see how questioning you about your use of Huggle is harrassing you. Are you unable to accept criticism?--Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:38, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

I've had thousands of edits, and have done a good job working through vandalism. The original edit that started all this was mislabeled as vandalism and was simply un-referenced and non-notable edits. In reality I should have ignored the original inflamatory comments the original anonymous editor made, but here we are. I'm not in it for an argument. The mistake I made was to label an edit as vandalism. The edit should not be reversed, although the warning should.- PabloMartinez (talk) 19:51, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

It's an entry on a navigational page, what exactly do you want them to source? "Notability" has nothing to do with your reverting the addition of the birth and death years in the entry. So, unless you can point me to a valid policy-based (or even MOS-based) reason for reverting both of the edits in question, the IP should feel free to restore the edits. The IP is rightly salty about what appears to be knee-jerk reverts of valid edits simply because they were made by an IP and has handled their incorrect labelling as a vandal quite well given the circumstances. They're not harassing you by asking why you seem to be targetting their edits without reason and your dismissive replies aren't helping to diffuse the situation. I'm sure you do fine anti-vandalism work, but please remember that using semi-automated anti-vandalism tools comes with the responsibility of ensuring you are only reverting unproductive edits and you need to be able to clearly explain the reason for your reverts when someone disagrees. --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:08, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

We all make mistakes, and we've all done that. I just apologize and go on. Overall, I saw fewer legitimate complaints in your talk history than I have seen with some Hugglers. I've also had less encouraging responses to my raising concerns. Do carry on, but you might want to offer them an apology.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:55, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for understanding. I've removed the vandalism tag on their talkpage and documented my explaination, and that I believed the edit was in goodfaith. Appreciate the feedback - PabloMartinez (talk) 19:58, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Xiaoguo instrument

Just a friendly heads up on Xiaoguo instrument. I declined your A1 speedy deletion request (no context) because there was plenty of context in the article -- "a small Chinese gong". ----Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:31, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Huggle vs. multi-user vandalism

Hi :) I just wanted to note that Huggle sadly fails to remove multi-user vandalism; you might already know about this issue. Here's a nice example: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coalhouse_Fort&type=revision&diff=832683981&oldid=832683479&diffmode=source ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:32, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Citation Barnstar
	Sorry I fixed the citations now, thanks for the heads up! IsabellaMcPhee (talk) 18:29, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi Pablo! I noticed you reverted my edit on Kamaiyah, i changed her birth date to something more accurate and you considered that "vandalism" any help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SH3P ReppinThe267 (talk • contribs) 12:36, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi SH3P ReppinThe267, looks like your second edit that states that she is best known for her hit single "F*** it up" triggered the rollback. If it is a legit edit, I apologize. Thanks! - PabloMartinez (talk) 12:39, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Alex Bain

Hi. I have just looked through the page's edit history, and thanks for fixing the vile content that 62.6.222.165 has added to his page. I, as well as the other users on here are immensely grateful. I admit I did go through a phase of making unconstructive edits, but not intentionally. I have learned by my mistakes. This user is just doing it purely because they think they can, and because they think it's 'fun'.

I am not sure if the same user has done it on multiple occasions, but judging by this edit, they may have. If it wasn't for users, like you on here, Wikipedia would just be completely messed up by anonymous users. I think they are editing anonymously because they think they can't be traced. Yeah, we'll see about that.

Anyway, thanks. Editors like you make Wikipedia a better place. I myself have had to fix an edit made by another anonymous user, who has stated that the actor was called 'Elliott Irvine', that he was born in 1996 (can't remember the exact date), and that he was Scott

User321a (talk) 20:23, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

(Continued from previous comment) Scottish. I amended that earlier as that was clearly incorrect.

Sorry about continuing it from the previous comment, but I accidentally clicked 'save', before I finished. I truly mean what I said in my last comment, and I admitted to making unconstructive edits in the past too. Admittedly, I am a tad too honest for my own good. User321a (talk) 20:26, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Is that I can't put local language i.e. native name

Yaripok there is space for native language /native name .

So it is putting local /native is not applicable in wikipedia I want to know.

Awangba Mangang (talk) 15:07, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

How to write Native name and Native Language for Meetei Language.

I think Huggle is not supporting our local languages/Alphabet .We are people's of Manipur Imphal east is one of our district ,so I am putting in native name in native language written in native script i.e. specially Meetei Script Meetei Mayek. Is it adding native name which English can't pronounce properly in our language is not applicable?--Awangba Mangang (talk) 15:32, 27 July 2018 (UTC) Awangba Mangang (talk) 15:30, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Rdward (talk) 18:09, 29 July 2018 (UTC) I am surprised and disappointed that my new contribution John Mason (writer) has been speedily deleted. Anyone interested in the history of British radio comedy might wonder on looking at the page about The Burkiss Way who was the John Mason named as one of the writers, the only one without a page link. I would have thought this exactly the kind of question Wikipedia should be able to answer. Rdward

I do not know the edits you speak of. - PabloMartinez (talk) 20:54, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Thank you

Much appreciated. Thank you for being reasonable. Feel free to remove my comments from your talk page Aspfennig (talk) 20:53, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Il Canto degli Italiani

What does "did not appear constuctive" mean? The original suggested that there is nothing like cingere in English. It's untrue -- there is "to gird" (Our home is girt by sea), cf. also the native girth and the Latinate cincture. Of course it may be used differently than cingere, that's why a literal translation wasn't possible, but it's not me who deemed it "constructive" to strew the translation with comments wherever something wasn't translated literally. I only conformed to what was already there. 195.187.108.4 (talk) 14:02, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

I noticed the edit too, and it does actually appear constructive to me; as pointed out, gird has an analogous meaning and construction in English. イヴァンスクルージ九十八_（会話） 18:34, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Unless you can refute the position I described with specific arguments then you can call the edit "not constructive". In any case I think you can get my point, you can see the talk page of the article and I will be glad to hear your feedback on how this article should be treated. The position of the article is not just false it is not just propaganda it is a disgrace.Beickus (talk) 20:17, 26 September 2018 (UTC)