Jump to content

Talk:European respirator standards

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Widefox (talk | contribs) at 00:15, 5 September 2020 (Assessment (C): Medicine, Viruses, +banner shell, +Occupational Safety and Health (High) (Rater)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Protection against viruses?

Why does the article claim that the mask protects against viruses, without mentioning diameters of virions and the pore size of the masks?

I find that claim awkward, even more so as in high safety labs people may wear full body suits, so there is a logical discrepancy here if they wear full body protection yet the article here on wikipedia insinuates that FFP2 would protect against coronaviruses as-is. Even more so as a percentage value is given, so if that is above 0%, why is "protection" assumed if it is higher than 0%? 2A02:8388:1641:8380:3AD5:47FF:FE18:CC7F (talk) 19:42, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Diameter

Could the diameter for filter size be mentioned in the table? E. g. to see the nanosize range and whether these masks make a difference, depending on the size. 2A02:8388:1641:8380:B9AB:76FC:25B:61AE (talk) 20:46, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]