Jump to content

Talk:People's Liberation Army

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JustAGunNut (talk | contribs) at 15:25, 25 November 2020. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Cyberwarfare unit

http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/china/2011/china-110526-cna01.htm

Where to stick this? Hcobb (talk) 01:39, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

From Talk:Computer insecurity, also consider China Singled Out for Cyberspying; U.S. Intelligence Report Labels Chinese 'Most Active' in Economic Espionage; Russia Also Named; see Blue Army (not Blue Team (U.S. politics)) in November 4th, 2011 WSJ by Siobhan Gorman. 99.190.85.111 (talk) 07:26, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

potential WSJ resource, regarding Indian Ocean, Seychelles, Sino-American relations

See India–United States relations and Sino-Indian relations, etc ... 97.87.29.188 (talk) 23:42, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:J-10a zhas.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:J-10a zhas.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:J-10a zhas.png)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:01, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What do the numbers mean?

It is unclear to me what the terms used in the side box mean. Can anyone clarify?
Examples:

  1. How can there be 6 million Deployed Personnel and yet only 2.3 million Active Personal?
  2. Are the numbers for Available for Service snd Fit for Service a calculation of the number of people who have ever served in the armed forces (i.e. all people who have been conscripted)?
  3. Why are both the numbers for Available for Service snd Fit for Service not simply the total number of able bodied men and women between the ages of x and x ?

In my opinion the numbers for Available for Service snd Fit for Service should be deleted if they correspond only to a concept of military training and conscription and not to military establishment. Figures like these are not given for other Western countries eg USA.
LookingGlass (talk) 09:08, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

At what level will the joint operational command system operate?

http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclass-cnt.aspx?id=20140105000105&cid=1101

I haven't been able to figure out at which level the new command structure will interact with the CMC. Is it a "joint chiefs" or a system of unified regional commanders? Hcobb (talk) 11:04, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

>> China announces military spending increase (Lihaas (talk) 16:41, 5 March 2014 (UTC)).[reply]

Article is named wrong

The correct full name is "Chinese People's Liberation Army." Even the characters given in the opening line: 中国人民解放军 confirm this, as the first three 中国人 mean "Chinese People." Here are three high quality sources:

China Military Online - About Us
http://english.chinamil.com.cn/site2/militarydatabase/2007-02/16/content_738761.htm
"China Military Online is now the only authoritative media of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to release military news and comprehensive military-related information on the Internet."
The Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA)
U.S. Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute
http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/display.cfm?pubID=959
People's Daily Online
The Chinese People's Liberation Army
http://english.people.com.cn/data/organs/pla.shtml

This is my first time here, so I hope a regular editor will at least note the full name in bold in the opening sentence. You don't have to rename the entire article, though that would be most accurate. 5Q5 (talk) 15:22, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


-- is there any record, or recent records, of the successes of the Liberation Army; specifically, parties or people or places that have been liberated, as the result of its activism, and the manner/method by which such liberation is achieved ?? -- anaceus — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.51.224.31 (talk) 16:49, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Numbers don't seem to add up

Under the heading "PLA ground force" the article states:

"The PLA deploys the world's largest ground force, currently totaling some 1.7 million personnel, or about 70 percent of the PLA's total manpower (3.4 million)."

However, 1.7 million is not 70 percent of 3.4 million... so it is unclear what is being expressed here.

In the paragraph above that one, the article mentions "its current strength of 2.28 million personnel". It's unclear if "personnel" means the same thing as "total manpower" but these numbers (2.28 million and 3.4 million) also seem to disagree.

Inimino (talk) 11:33, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article lacks thesis

The Article needs a thesis about the People's Liberation Army. before you develop them, "Global force for peace", "totalitarian army", "a force that lacks that capabilities of Western armies but is developing quickly." your suggestions here: 108.65.248.132 (talk) 07:04, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not the largest military force?

According to this article's introduction:

"The PLA is the world's largest military force, with a strength of approximately 2,285,000 personnel"

However, according to the article on North Korea's military (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_People%27s_Army):

"With 9,495,000 active, reserve, and paramilitary personnel, it is the largest military organization on Earth"

Which surely puts China's military in second place, unless "military force" and "military organization" have different meanings.

31.205.71.231 (talk) 23:11, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, different meanings. China's 2.2 million personnel are active military, while North Korea's 9.4 million include reserves, paramilitary and militia forces also. Antiochus the Great (talk) 11:03, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

President or CMC

A certain user keeps reverting all references to the president of China to the chairman of the Central Military Commision, which controls the PLA. The issue is that in China the paramount leader holds the title of president, chairman of the CMC, and is general secretary of the communist party. The PLA is considered the de facto national military of China, despite not being an official part of the government. The President of China, as paramount leader, controls the PLA as chairman, but his primary position is the president, and is likely to be referenced as such. Per his common title it should be kept as president to avoid confusion (and that in common practice the PLA acts as an arm of the government). Although for specifically for article titles Wikipedia:COMMONNAME should apply to when President Xi is named in the page. 24.192.250.124 (talk) 02:42, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on People's Liberation Army. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true oder failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:41, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

　Army motto

http://www.refworld.org/docid/57c442224.html Army motto of PLA should be "heeds the Party's commands, able to fight and be victorious, and are exemplary in conduct" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 42.3.175.143 (talk) 17:44, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No conscription

It is not correct that "compulsory military service in China has never been enforced due to large numbers of military and paramilitary personnel". Large numbers of military and paramilitary personnel are only achieved by conscription. During the civil war and subsequent invasion of Korea only conscription gave the CPC sufficient numbers of personnel. Today it still conscripts very large numbers of personnel.Royalcourtier (talk) 02:32, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Marines not a branch of service

Please do not add the marines as a branch of service as they are just an integral part of the navy (unlike the US) 24.192.250.124 (talk) 23:22, 11 June 2017 (UTC) 23:15, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on People's Liberation Army. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:33, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PLA Navy name change discussion

Currently a propsal to rename PLA Navy to Chinese Navy, and figures any interested users might visit this page: Talk:People's Liberation Army Navy#Requested move 7 September 2018Garuda28 (talk) 20:56, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 20 April 2019

The budget for 2018 was $165 billion and this year $177,6 billion.

March 2017: The budget was announced to be $151.4 billion March 2018: The budget was announced to be $165 billion March 2019: The budget was announced to be $177,6 billion

Link https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/05/china-defense-budget-slowing-growth-in-2019-military-spending-.html

https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2019/03/04/asia-pacific/politics-diplomacy-asia-pacific/china-vows-reasonable-rise-defense-spending-ahead-budgets-release/#.XLsy4PZuJZU Legende Legende (talk) 14:56, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Erledigt NiciVampireHeart 10:13, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. 💵Money💵emoji💵💸 01:34, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of In Media section?

Addition of In Media or In Popular Culture Section to show its portrayal in multiple forms of Media: i.e. video games, movies, books JustAGunNut (talk) 14:01, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discouraged per WP:MILPOP.Garuda28 (talk) 14:04, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was meaning more in a context of material that has been produced by their government in relation to methods or values used: how their recruitment works through their use of media and their representation of those values in various media (recruitment poster or television advertisement, to name two). I apologise for any confusion. JustAGunNut (talk) 15:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:People%27s_Liberation_Army&oldid=990622060"