Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas G. Moore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 00:52, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Nicholas G. Moore

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Nicholas G. Moore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO An internet search shows no Reliable Sources. A Forbes profile page is NOT sufficient for Notability. ---Avatar317^(talk) 02:02, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:20, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:20, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

• Comment - I've added 3 sources on the page, of which the aspects of primary/secondary can be up for debate. The huffpost profile [1] suggests to me that he is notable to some extent. Will continue to look into this later but for now I'm going towards a keep. Pahunkat (talk) 11:50, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
• Delete Not enough sources. Some of the sentences do not have sources, so it seems there may be COI or UPE. How would the creator have all this info without sources? Expertwikiguy (talk) 10:55, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 03:12, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Kolma8 (talk) 13:38, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

• DELETE: fails BASIC The Ace in Spades (talk) 12:01, 15 December 2020 (UTC) — The Ace in Spades (talk • contribs) is a confirmed sock puppet of Waskerton (talk • contribs).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.