Talk:*Lisp

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This article has been renamed as the result of a move request.

Mistaken attribution

The attribution to Steele and Hillis may be due to the excellent paper they jointly authoured describing "Connection Machine Lisp" (see here). It's quite possible to confuse *lisp and CMLisp.

what is the full form of lisp?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.200.95.130 (talk) 06:30, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move

If we can in fact move to *Lisp, then I say go for it. --maru (talk) Contribs 02:49, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Gdr 13:47, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possible other contributors

IIRC when I was using *Lisp around 1995, I met the employee assigned (half-time) to maintain the language. A few neurons claim that he had an email address like [email protected], but I wouldn't bet on it. This would have been around 1995. Am I remembering this correctly? --Zippy 08:18, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I had a friend with I think those initials who would likely be a candidate for that position; if you want, I can dredge up his True Name (no way could I spell the last one correctly from memory :-) and more. Hga 18:56, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, "Wilson" is very difficult to spell correctly :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.73.161.123 (talk) 14:47, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion discussion re Steve Omohundro

There is an active discussion now about whether or not the article Steve Omohundro should be kept or deleted. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Omohundro (2nd nomination). --Zippy 03:59, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]