The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
I notice there's nothing about the "unpleasantness" with a fashion designer (she was banned?) and the "makeover" following an uncharacteristically scathing FWD article. LaVieEntiere (talk) 04:08, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ms. Horyn admitted she originally had absolutely no interest in fashion or writing about it. I think she said she would prefer to be a sportswriter. She literally has the worst taste and a lack of appreciation of beautiful clothes. She'll praise anything above the knee but even the same dress or skirt a few inches longer (even just covering the knee) she automatically finds repulsive. She seems to have only one idea: that the late '60s miniskirt is the greatest idea ever conceived (except for rock and roll) and that it can never be supplanted. To her, it's the symbol of all that's "modern" and the essence of all things sexual. After all, no one ever had any sex before the mini was conjured up and forced on the public over a period of years, right? In addition, Horyn is not the second NYT fashion critic after Amy Spindler (who must have been Horyn's mentor because she also considered minis the ultimate). Eugenia Sheppard was an esteemed earlier NYT fashion reporter and quite a bit more interested in fashion than her successors. Of course, there was better fashion in those days. Why can't there be someone who disagrees with Ms. Horyn in the fashion pages of the Times? Editorial pages always present different viewpoints so why can't NYT fashion reporting be more comprehensive, less restrictive and not only in praise of endless, repetitive '60s revivals? I wish someone would offer Ms. Horyn a sportswriting job and we could get a Times fashion reporter (not necessarily a critic) who appreciates great style. And women would again be encouraged to wear beautiful and classy clothes and not just "show off" their legs as how they present themselves. And the new Times fashion writers would show more photos of styles by more designers, not just what Horyn is enamored of. There would be more to fashion than just legs. I always have to go to Style.com to see all the collections that Horyn doesn’t approve of. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Genny90two (talk • contribs) 01:42, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]