Talk:Eldfell/GA1

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:09, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll place issues in the template below: Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:09, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:

- not too bad. Didn't look closely due to other issues.

Manual of Style compliance:

- Further reading section should be reviewed and some material used for referencing etc.

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:

- not checked due to the scarcity of refs

Citations to reliable sources, where required:

- about 75% of the article's prose is unreferenced

No original research:

- who knows until referencing fixed

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:

Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:

Pass or Fail:

- referencing needs finishing before this is brought back. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:09, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]