Talk:How the Mind Works
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What is this Article About?
Just curious, is this article about the book "How the Mind Works", or is it about actually how the mind works? Ikh 05:35, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
- The book by Steven Pinker. Otherwise the title would be in normal sentence casing (Wikipedia style is that titles only capitalize the first letter in the title). Also, "How the mind works" isn't a very encyclopedic title anyway. -- Schaefer 06:10, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
- OK, thanks! Ikh 02:11, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
Fodor?
The bottom of the article mentions a critical review by Jerry Fodor, but in fact Fodor was so critical he wrote a book titled "The Mind Doesn't Work That Way", which probably ought to be mentioned if anyone ever expands this article. 68.195.124.77 03:14, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
blank slate
i'll leave it in for now as an example of his view, but it's pretty foolish for the only quote in an article on "how the mind works" to be from "the blank slate". perhaps someone who read the actual book could spiff this article up? --dan (talk) 13:46, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Canadian or American?
In the current article it claims that Pinker is an American cognitive scientist. Although he teaches in the U.S. today, he was born and raised in Montreal, and earned several degrees from McGill University. Wouldn't that make him a Canadian cognitive scientist? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peepstein (talk • contribs) 23:39, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Mathematically provable truth
East Pole's Steven Pinker may better note that the flamingo is stiffly pinker than the bruin or the brown bear of etymological tautology, which in turn is stiffly pinker than the grizzly and any other species. This mathematically provable notion has been well known since West Pole's Eleanor Rosch's prototype theory refined around semantic categories in 1975 in accordance with Paul Grice's (1975) famous implicature or the implicit nature of meaning in mind, that is, embodied a posteriori, acquired or learned, rather than embedded a priori, innate or inborn. Innatism may be not simply false but morally fraudulent. -- KYPark (talk) 11:10, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
- P.S.: Etymologically, the flamingo stems from flame, while Korean bulgom ("bruin, brown bear") stems from bul ("fire") and gom ("bear"). Yet, we hesitate to answer which is stiffly fierier, the flamingo or the bruin, as we are not born a mathematical and mechanical sensor. -- KYPark (talk) 12:11, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
File:StevePinker.jpg Nominated for Deletion
![]() |
An image used in this article, File:StevePinker.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests December 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:48, 12 December 2011 (UTC) |
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on How the Mind Works. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060619122521/http://pinker.wjh.harvard.edu/books/htmw/index.html to http://pinker.wjh.harvard.edu/books/htmw/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:13, 5 April 2017 (UTC)