Jump to content

Talk:John Netley

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Huh?

"However, Netley was a twin - his brother William Henry survived for only a few months - and as such, might well have been left-handed." EEng (talk) 07:14, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. Huh? On the internet I found people claiming that left-handed people always have a right-handed twin. In cases where left-handed people didn't have a twin, such a hypothetical twin would be re-absorbed in the uterus... So this statement means that a writer believed such claims to be true, and also believes them to be known universally.
However - to my knowledge - such claims were never conclusively proven, and many cases can be found that suggest the contrary: There are twins who are both left- or right-handed; and there are cases of tightly-controlled pregnancies with no twins, but the child turns out left-handed nonetheless.
P.S:, I found Twins and handedness - people have a 10% chance to be left-handed, while twins have been found to have a 17% chance. That still is no scientific evidence of anything, since a 83% chance remains that Netley was right-handed. So the statement is misinformation, nothing else. --Enyavar (talk) 12:56, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]