User talk:RL0919/Archive 2005-2006

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Welcome

Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.

We're so glad you're here! -- Essjay · Talk 16:26, July 12, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks, glad to be here. :-) -- RL0919

Wow

Thanks for cleaning up the bias on Objectivism. It was pretty awful. Dave (talk) 19:01, July 12, 2005 (UTC)

You have wrote what I should have and did it better than I could have. You have also convinced me that AR doesn't belong in the "LGBT Rights Opponent" category under the stated criteria.Billyjoekoepsel 18:18, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Alienus's edit war

Alienus insists on categorizing Ayn Rand in "LGBT Rights opposition," despite the strong consensus against it. Since I am close to violation of the revert rules, I would greatly appreciate help in reverting Alienus's non-consensus changes. Thank you. LaszloWalrus 07:42, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Objectivism and Pseudoreligion

The pseudoreligion article seems to have a pretty heavy bias. You seem to be an expert on Objectivism. I was wondering what you thought? LaszloWalrus 07:57, 24 May 2006 (UTC)