Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 August 12
Appearance
August 12
- Unused, obsolete, redundant to Image: 315th Airlift Wing.png Pmsyyz 00:13, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- The image is tagged as PD-self, but it's the logo of an organisation. In any case, the article in which it was used was deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oxford Universal Society Union, so it's now an orphaned image. Black Falcon (Talk) 00:19, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heroism (computer game) Coredesat 03:39, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (image appears to be photoshopped), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acquire software Coredesat 03:52, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- KEEP - can still be used to illistrate the act of using two computer monitors at once.--Hornetman16 (talk) 08:14, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. If someone wants to illustrate using two monitors at once they would much more likely upload their own version and be unaware of this one. — jammycakes (t)(c) 18:55, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- Low quality, obsoleted by commons:Image:106th Rescue Wing.png --Pmsyyz 04:38, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Low quality, obsoleted by commons:Image:109th Airlift Wing.png --Pmsyyz 04:38, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned shock image uploaded by single-purpose account. Pixelface 06:45, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - per not orphaned and used to illistrate a point.--Hornetman16 (talk) 08:11, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Löschen - Vanity image, doesn't appropriately illustrate the subject either. The account was only created to upload and promote this video, if they had some other contribs it's legality and vanity wouldn't be so questionable. As it is, we can't even be sure they made it. --Lucid 09:04, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Then how can you be sure other people who claim to have made a certin photo actually made it?--Hornetman16 (talk) 19:31, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Mainly, trustworthiness, secondly solid source info. This picture has neither. That's only one of many reasons this image is inappropriate, though.--Lucid 04:21, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- Then how can you be sure other people who claim to have made a certin photo actually made it?--Hornetman16 (talk) 19:31, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Because the word owned on wiki should not only be for owned on one person to another, it should have all types including Self ownage in which my image clearly shows. and yes it is my image: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=42-32erssho
--Freeboski 18:57, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not a place to promote Youtube video(s). Wikipedia is not for personal file storage. More importantly, Wikipedia is not a slang usage guide. The articles for decapitation or execution methods do not require animated GIFs to illustrate the topics, and the article for the recent slang meaning of the word "owned" does not require an animated GIF either. The GIF is just a violent video with a word at the end. The image is unencyclopedic. It shows your personal opinion of how you think the word should be used. To claim the image is an example of someone being "owned" is original research. --Pixelface 04:16, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per Pixelface. The picture shows someone doing something on the ground, it exploding closely to them and then everything being enveloped in smoke; the word 'owned' at the end is pure interpretation, since even if we agree with the rather nebulous definition supplied on that page, without any knowledge of what happened to the victim it's impossible to tell whether the description is accurate. And even if it is correct, it's still in poor taste, since the caption 'owned' is supposed to be some kind of joke but, for the caption to be accurate, the substance of it would be a fairly serious and harmful accident. Some people might find that kind of thing funny, but I hardly think it's appropriate for Wikipedia. Lordrosemount 16:35, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - What Lordrosemount said Jerazol 19:00, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
- Author-requested deletion of file because of inability upload viewable SVG image after 3x unsuccessful upload attempts →Lwalt ♦ talk 07:40, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Adam levine ian bagg (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, looks Unencyclopedic, looks nonfree But|seriously|folks 08:00, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- 1px X 1px, Where is image? OsamaK 12:37, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Speedied under CSD I2 (corrupt/empty image). howcheng {chat} 16:54, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
this image is being used in the bicolor cat article and should not be deleted as it displays the mask and mantle pattern.
- This image appears in the article Lisunov Li-2 with the caption "Lisunov Li-2 NOTE: the Wikipedia doesn't permit Soviet-era images due to nervousness about Russian copyright. Therefore we are using this public domain image. Links to Li-2 images are found in the main text to the left. If you have a good image of an Li-2, please upload!" I can understand the uploader is upset that the image he uploaded on Commons got deleted due to insufficient copyright status, and I can understand free content is usually preferable, even if it means somewhat of a loss in quality, but this childish drawing does not belong in the encyclopedia. -Nard 14:52, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as unencyclopedic. -- But|seriously|folks 16:48, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- I'm a bit of a fan of the sketch, but found a PD image to upload at Image:Lisunov Li-2.png --Knulclunk 02:49, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks - my original image was PD also, but it was deleted without discussion. This original sketch is all I could come up with when faced with an aggressive deleter. I would prefer that the deleter would undelete the original non-copyrighted, PD, free-to-use image. Otherwise we're going to be bogged down in this pointless debate for months. The only photographs available of the original Li-2's are soviet PD images. The sticky point seems to be the confusion over the licence since there was no copyright in the soviet union. The following description usually accompanies:
- "This file is in the public domain in Russia. It was published before January 1st, 1954. Works belonging to the former Soviet government or other Soviet legal entities published before January 1st, 1954, are also public domain in Russia." or words to that effect.
- The deleter refused to help locate the licencing information, stating the tags (PD:RUSSIA) are wrong and the licencing was wrong (there's no soviet PD licence in the drop list. Any help is appreciated since I've got lots more submissions to make and I hope I don't have to go through this comedy every time. Hoserjoe 03:14, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, possibly unencyclopedic. This is a cc-by-sa-2.0 photo uploaded from Flickr to illustrate the Eminem article (source image). However, doubts have been raised whether this photo depicts Eminem.[1] See this photo, uploaded by the same Flickr user, which appears to depict the same subject (note the identical background) and is clearly not Eminem. --Muchness 16:47, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Nuke it. I found it quickly while searching for a different free image and didn't even look at it closely. east.718 at 17:03, August 12, 2007
- Kaiserfuji (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unencyclopedic. KTC 18:33, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Deleted, Commons image showing. – Quadell (talk) (random) 14:41, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- Orhpaned. Oli Filth 19:12, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Ralphybaby (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Image taken from BBC website; no permission given, easily replicatable (and indeed replicated) image, flagged incorrectly as PD-user. Laïka 20:09, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Like these images should be JPG not PNG, it's not a drawing. I'll replace it with JPG leter using BOT OsamaK 21:19, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- I think we should keep this until it's replaced. It's a free image, after all, and used by many users. – Quadell (talk) (random) 14:43, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- A PNG version of this image is also available, and it's should be PNG. it's screenshot OsamaK 21:29, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Deleted, Commons image showing. – Quadell (talk) (random) 14:44, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- Unused, and a PNG version of this image is also available OsamaK 21:31, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Have converted to equivalent .png file, as suggested, and linked to Birrong and Regents Park at the same time. Tabletop 00:28, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Unuesd, and a PNG version of this image is also available OsamaK 21:58, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Unuesd, and a PNG version of this image is also available OsamaK 22:00, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Deryck Chan (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unuesd, and a PNG version of this image is also available OsamaK 22:01, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Please delete as the bot has already created a PNG for my image and the new image's superceded the old one. --Deryck C. 07:13, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- Unuesd, and a PNG version of this image is also available OsamaK 22:12, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- There is Image:Mary1England1544.jpg: bigger OsamaK 22:14, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- You could have just speedied this (or marked it for speedy deletion); CSD I1 covers this. - Mark 07:20, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
- Minesweeper (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unuesd and obsolete OsamaK 22:25, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- A vector version of this image is also available OsamaK 22:28, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Deleted, Commons image bleeding through. – Quadell (talk) (random) 14:48, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- Unuesd and obsolete OsamaK 22:31, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Unuesd and obsolete OsamaK 22:33, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Unuesd and obsolete OsamaK 22:34, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Unuesd and obsolete OsamaK 22:35, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- HAL9triple0 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unuesd and obsolete OsamaK 22:37, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Deleted, Commons image bleeding through. – Quadell (talk) (random) 14:47, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- Unuesd and obsolete OsamaK 22:39, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Deleted, Commons image bleeding through. – Quadell (talk) (random) 14:47, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- Unuesd and obsolete OsamaK 22:39, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Unuesd and obsolete OsamaK 22:44, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Unuesd and obsolete OsamaK 22:45, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Unuesd and obsolete OsamaK 22:46, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Ahoerstemeier (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unuesd and obsolete OsamaK 22:49, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Unuesd and obsolete OsamaK 22:49, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Unuesd and obsolete OsamaK 22:51, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Deleted, Commons image bleeding through. – Quadell (talk) (random) 14:50, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- Unuesd and obsolete OsamaK 22:53, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Wile E. Heresiarch (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unuesd and obsolete OsamaK 22:53, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Deleted, Commons image bleeding through. – Quadell (talk) (random) 14:50, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- Wile E. Heresiarch (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unuesd and obsolete OsamaK 22:54, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Deleted, Commons image bleeding through. – Quadell (talk) (random) 14:50, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- Wile E. Heresiarch (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unuesd and obsolete OsamaK 22:54, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Deleted, Commons image bleeding through. – Quadell (talk) (random) 14:50, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- Unuesd and obsolete OsamaK 22:56, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Unuesd and obsolete OsamaK 22:56, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I had forgotten that this one was still around. The other copy is orders of magnitude better. Agree with OsamaK. Dsmdgold 13:34, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Unuesd and obsolete OsamaK 22:58, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Robin Hood (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unuesd and obsolete OsamaK 22:59, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Deleted, Commons image bleeding through. – Quadell (talk) (random) 14:50, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- Unuesd and obsolete OsamaK 23:00, 12 August 2007 (UTC)