2023 Chinese balloon incident: Difference between revisions
too much copying, made legality its own section, not continental |
clean up, Pentagon was not first to detect or report, updated citation, Shandong not confirmed |
||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
The American and Canadian militaries announced that the balloon was for [[Observation balloon|surveillance]], while the [[Chinese government]] maintained it was a civilian (mainly [[meteorological]]) [[airship]] that had been blown off course.<ref name="Lee">{{cite news |last=Lee |first=Matthew |date=February 4, 2023 |title=Chinese balloon soars across US; Blinken scraps Beijing trip |url=https://apnews.com/article/politics-antony-blinken-china-314302278a5f05bdc2df146ed5b35ec6 |url-status=live |publisher=[[Associated Press]] |access-date=February 5, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230205001417/https://apnews.com/article/politics-antony-blinken-china-314302278a5f05bdc2df146ed5b35ec6 |archive-date=February 5, 2023}}</ref> The U.S. said that the balloon was capable of [[Signals intelligence|geolocating electronic communications]] and carried intelligence surveillance equipment inconsistent with that of a weather balloon.<ref name="nytimes/2023/02/09/china-balloon-program">{{cite news |last1=Wong |first1=Edward |last2=Barnes |first2=Julian E. |date=February 9, 2023 |title=Chinese Balloon Had Tools to Collect Electronic Communications, U.S. Says |work=[[The New York Times]] |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/09/us/politics/china-spy-balloon-program.html |url-access=limited |access-date=February 9, 2023 |archive-date=February 9, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230209231207/https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/09/us/politics/china-spy-balloon-program.html |url-status=live}}</ref> It added that similar Chinese spy balloons have flown over more than 40 nations.<ref name="washingtonpost/2023/02/09/chinese-balloon-program">{{cite news |last1=Hudson |first1=John |last2=Nakashima |first2=Ellen |last3=Lamothe |first3=Dan |date=February 9, 2023 |title=U.S. declassifies balloon intelligence, calls out China for spying |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/02/09/chinese-balloon-surveillance-program/ |url-status=live |url-access=limited |access-date=February 9, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230210005507/https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/02/09/chinese-balloon-surveillance-program/ |archive-date=February 10, 2023}}</ref><ref name="nytimes/2023/02/09/china-balloon-program" /> Analysts said that its flight path and structural characteristics were dissimilar from those of a typical weather balloon.<ref name="scientificamerican/chinese-balloon-maneuverability">{{cite news |last=Bushwick |first=Sophie |date=February 3, 2023 |title=Chinese Spy Balloon Has Unexpected Maneuverability |work=[[Scientific American]] |url=https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/chinese-spy-balloon-has-unexpected-maneuverability/ |url-status=live |access-date=February 7, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230206230959/https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/chinese-spy-balloon-has-unexpected-maneuverability/ |archive-date=February 6, 2023 |quote=This maneuverability is beyond the capabilities of most high-altitude balloons, says John Villasenor, director of the Institute for Technology, Law and Policy and a professor of electrical engineering, law, public policy and management at the University of California, Los Angeles.}}</ref><ref name="time/6253002">{{cite magazine |title=The Chinese Balloon Looks Nothing Like a Weather Balloon |first=Anisha |last=Kohli |date=February 4, 2023 |url=https://time.com/6253002/chinese-balloon-weather-balloon-experts/ |access-date=February 7, 2023 |magazine=[[Time (magazine)|Time]] |url-access=limited |archive-date=February 4, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230204201819/https://time.com/6253002/chinese-balloon-weather-balloon-experts/ |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="bbc.com">{{cite news |date=February 3, 2023 |title=China balloon: Could it have been blown off course as Beijing claims? |language=en-GB |publisher=[[BBC News]] |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-64514120 |url-status=live |access-date=February 7, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230204083949/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-64514120 |archive-date=February 4, 2023}}</ref> American officials later disclosed that they had been tracking the Chinese balloon since it was launched from [[Hainan]]. Its original destinations were likely [[Guam]] and [[Hawaii]],{{efn|Guam and Hawaii are home to key U.S. military installations<ref>{{cite news |title=How a Fog of Questions Over a Spy Balloon and U.F.O.s Fed a Diplomatic Crisis |work=[[The New York Times]] |date=February 15, 2023 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/15/us/politics/balloon-ufo-us-china.html |agency=New York Times|last1=Wong |first1=Edward |last2=Barnes |first2=Julian E. |last3=Entous |first3=Adam }}</ref>}} but [[prevailing winds]] blew it off course and across North America.<ref>{{Cite news |last= |date=2023-02-16 |title=Downed Chinese balloon aimed for Hawaii but was blown off course - U.S. official |language=en |work=[[Reuters]] |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/us/downed-chinese-balloon-aimed-hawaii-was-blown-off-course-us-official-2023-02-15/ |access-date=2023-02-23}}</ref> |
The American and Canadian militaries announced that the balloon was for [[Observation balloon|surveillance]], while the [[Chinese government]] maintained it was a civilian (mainly [[meteorological]]) [[airship]] that had been blown off course.<ref name="Lee">{{cite news |last=Lee |first=Matthew |date=February 4, 2023 |title=Chinese balloon soars across US; Blinken scraps Beijing trip |url=https://apnews.com/article/politics-antony-blinken-china-314302278a5f05bdc2df146ed5b35ec6 |url-status=live |publisher=[[Associated Press]] |access-date=February 5, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230205001417/https://apnews.com/article/politics-antony-blinken-china-314302278a5f05bdc2df146ed5b35ec6 |archive-date=February 5, 2023}}</ref> The U.S. said that the balloon was capable of [[Signals intelligence|geolocating electronic communications]] and carried intelligence surveillance equipment inconsistent with that of a weather balloon.<ref name="nytimes/2023/02/09/china-balloon-program">{{cite news |last1=Wong |first1=Edward |last2=Barnes |first2=Julian E. |date=February 9, 2023 |title=Chinese Balloon Had Tools to Collect Electronic Communications, U.S. Says |work=[[The New York Times]] |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/09/us/politics/china-spy-balloon-program.html |url-access=limited |access-date=February 9, 2023 |archive-date=February 9, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230209231207/https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/09/us/politics/china-spy-balloon-program.html |url-status=live}}</ref> It added that similar Chinese spy balloons have flown over more than 40 nations.<ref name="washingtonpost/2023/02/09/chinese-balloon-program">{{cite news |last1=Hudson |first1=John |last2=Nakashima |first2=Ellen |last3=Lamothe |first3=Dan |date=February 9, 2023 |title=U.S. declassifies balloon intelligence, calls out China for spying |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/02/09/chinese-balloon-surveillance-program/ |url-status=live |url-access=limited |access-date=February 9, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230210005507/https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/02/09/chinese-balloon-surveillance-program/ |archive-date=February 10, 2023}}</ref><ref name="nytimes/2023/02/09/china-balloon-program" /> Analysts said that its flight path and structural characteristics were dissimilar from those of a typical weather balloon.<ref name="scientificamerican/chinese-balloon-maneuverability">{{cite news |last=Bushwick |first=Sophie |date=February 3, 2023 |title=Chinese Spy Balloon Has Unexpected Maneuverability |work=[[Scientific American]] |url=https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/chinese-spy-balloon-has-unexpected-maneuverability/ |url-status=live |access-date=February 7, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230206230959/https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/chinese-spy-balloon-has-unexpected-maneuverability/ |archive-date=February 6, 2023 |quote=This maneuverability is beyond the capabilities of most high-altitude balloons, says John Villasenor, director of the Institute for Technology, Law and Policy and a professor of electrical engineering, law, public policy and management at the University of California, Los Angeles.}}</ref><ref name="time/6253002">{{cite magazine |title=The Chinese Balloon Looks Nothing Like a Weather Balloon |first=Anisha |last=Kohli |date=February 4, 2023 |url=https://time.com/6253002/chinese-balloon-weather-balloon-experts/ |access-date=February 7, 2023 |magazine=[[Time (magazine)|Time]] |url-access=limited |archive-date=February 4, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230204201819/https://time.com/6253002/chinese-balloon-weather-balloon-experts/ |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="bbc.com">{{cite news |date=February 3, 2023 |title=China balloon: Could it have been blown off course as Beijing claims? |language=en-GB |publisher=[[BBC News]] |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-64514120 |url-status=live |access-date=February 7, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230204083949/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-64514120 |archive-date=February 4, 2023}}</ref> American officials later disclosed that they had been tracking the Chinese balloon since it was launched from [[Hainan]]. Its original destinations were likely [[Guam]] and [[Hawaii]],{{efn|Guam and Hawaii are home to key U.S. military installations<ref>{{cite news |title=How a Fog of Questions Over a Spy Balloon and U.F.O.s Fed a Diplomatic Crisis |work=[[The New York Times]] |date=February 15, 2023 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/15/us/politics/balloon-ufo-us-china.html |agency=New York Times|last1=Wong |first1=Edward |last2=Barnes |first2=Julian E. |last3=Entous |first3=Adam }}</ref>}} but [[prevailing winds]] blew it off course and across North America.<ref>{{Cite news |last= |date=2023-02-16 |title=Downed Chinese balloon aimed for Hawaii but was blown off course - U.S. official |language=en |work=[[Reuters]] |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/us/downed-chinese-balloon-aimed-hawaii-was-blown-off-course-us-official-2023-02-15/ |access-date=2023-02-23}}</ref> |
||
The incident increased [[U.S.–China tensions]] and |
The incident increased [[U.S.–China tensions]]. The United States has called the balloon's presence a violation of its sovereignty, and its Secretary of State [[Antony Blinken]] postponed a long-awaited diplomatic visit to Beijing.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Pamuk |first=Humeyra |last2=Ali |first2=Idrees |last3=Martina |first3=Michael |last4=Ali |first4=Idrees |date=2023-02-04 |title=Blinken postpones China trip over 'unacceptable' Chinese spy balloon |work=Reuters |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/china-expresses-regret-that-civilian-airship-strays-over-us-2023-02-03/}}</ref><ref name="wapo2">{{cite news |last1=Cadell |first1=Cate |last2=Hudson |first2=John |last3=Abutaleb |first3=Yasmeen |title=Blinken postpones China trip as suspected spy balloon detected over U.S. |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/02/03/blinken-postpones-china-trip-suspected-spy-balloon-detected-over-us |url-access=limited |access-date=February 5, 2023}}</ref><ref name="Hansler">{{cite news |last1=Hansler |first1=Jennifer |last2=Liptak |first2=Kevin |last3=Herb |first3=Jeremy |last4=Atwood |first4=Kylie |last5=Sciutto |first5=Kylie |last6=Liebermann |first6=Oren |date=February 3, 2023 |title=Blinken postpones trip to Beijing after Chinese spy balloon spotted over US, officials say |publisher=[[CNN]] |url=https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/03/politics/china-us-balloon-intl/index.html |url-status=live |access-date=February 5, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230204022758/https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/03/politics/china-us-balloon-intl/index.html |archive-date=February 4, 2023}}</ref> Canada summoned the Chinese ambassador in response to the incident.<ref name="ctvnews.ca">{{cite news |date=February 3, 2023 |title=Ottawa tight-lipped on details as Canada, U.S. call out China over balloon |url=https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/ottawa-tight-lipped-on-details-as-canada-u-s-call-out-china-over-balloon-1.6258826 |access-date=February 3, 2023 |publisher=[[CTV News]] |archive-date=February 4, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230204022756/https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/ottawa-tight-lipped-on-details-as-canada-u-s-call-out-china-over-balloon-1.6258826 |url-status=live}}</ref> |
||
On February 2, a similar Chinese balloon was observed flying over Latin America. In the United States, [[List of high-altitude object events in 2023|three other high-altitude objects]], over [[2023 Alaska high-altitude object|Northern Alaska]] (February 10),<ref name="NYT">{{cite news |last1=Cooper |first1=Helene |author1-link=Helene Cooper |last2=Barnes |first2=Julian E. |last3=Wong |first3=Edward |date=2023-02-10 |title=U.S. Shoots Down High-Altitude Object Over Alaska |language=en-US |work=[[The New York Times]] |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/10/us/politics/unidentified-object-shot-down-alaska.html |url-status=live |url-access=limited |access-date=2023-02-11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230210194233/https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/10/us/politics/unidentified-object-shot-down-alaska.html |archive-date=February 10, 2023 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> [[2023 Yukon high-altitude object|Yukon]] (February 11),<ref>{{cite news |last1=Newton |first1=Paula |date=11 February 2023 |title=NORAD says additional 'object' detected over northern Canada |publisher=[[CNN]] |url=https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/11/politics/norad-additional-object-northern-canada/index.html |url-status=live |access-date=11 February 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230211221434/https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/11/politics/norad-additional-object-northern-canada/index.html |archive-date=February 11, 2023}}</ref> and [[2023 Lake Huron high-altitude object|Lake Huron]] (February 11–12) respectively, were detected and subsequently shot down; later assessment said they had no relations to China.<ref name=":4" /><ref name=":2">{{cite news |last1=Stewart |first1=Phil |last2=Shalal |first2=Andrea |last3=Stewart |first3=Phil |date=2023-02-13 |title=U.S. military brings down flying object over Lake Huron |publisher=[[Reuters]] |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-officials-believe-flying-objects-over-alaska-canada-were-balloons-schumer-2023-02-12/ |url-status=live |access-date=February 13, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230213000224/https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-officials-believe-flying-objects-over-alaska-canada-were-balloons-schumer-2023-02-12/ |archive-date=February 13, 2023}}</ref> |
|||
==Background== |
==Background== |
||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
{{further|History of military ballooning}} |
{{further|History of military ballooning}} |
||
The earliest |
The earliest record of military ballooning shows [[sky lantern]]s being used for signaling in 3rd century China. In the west, balloons became valued for their role in observing the battlefield and directing artillery. Their usage peaked during World War I, after which they were increasingly replaced with airplanes.<ref name="TimeFeb3">{{cite magazine |last=De Guzman |first=Chad |date=February 3, 2023 |title=Why Is China Allegedly Using a Spy Balloon When It Has a Global Satellite Network? |url=https://time.com/6252673/chinese-spy-balloon-satellite/ |url-status=live |magazine=[[Time (magazine)|Time]] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230203165707/https://time.com/6252673/chinese-spy-balloon-satellite/ |archive-date=February 3, 2023 |access-date=February 4, 2023 |url-access=limited}}</ref> During the [[Cold War]], the United States sent hundreds of reconnaissance balloons, ostensibly for "meteorological survey" under [[Project Genetrix]], over China and other [[Eastern Bloc]] countries to gain intelligence on their nuclear capabilities, despite their protests.<ref name=":12">{{Cite news |last=Schwarz |first=Jon |date=2023-02-07 |title=U.S. Sent "Weather" Balloons to Spy on China and the Soviet Union in the 1950s |url=https://theintercept.com/2023/02/07/china-balloon-soviet-union/ |website=[[The Intercept]] |quote=Asked if the United States feels that they have the right to send these balloons at a certain height anywhere around the globe, Dulles answered, Yes, I think that we feel that way.}}</ref> |
||
Although mostly supplanted by [[Reconnaissance satellite|surveillance satellite]]s and [[unmanned surveillance and reconnaissance aerial vehicle|unmanned aerial vehicle]]s, balloons have retained some advantages, such as a lower cost of production and deployment.<ref name="BBCFeb3">{{cite news |last1=Ng |first1=Kelly |date=February 3, 2023 |title=Why would China use a spy balloon when it has satellites? |publisher=[[BBC News]] |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-64508086 |url-status=live |access-date=February 4, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230204120702/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-64508086 |archive-date=February 4, 2023}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Hitchens |first=Theresa |date=July 28, 2022 |title=Way up in the air: World View looks to expand customer base for its 'Stratollite' balloon |work=Breaking Defense |url=https://breakingdefense.sites.breakingmedia.com/2022/07/way-up-in-the-air-world-view-looks-to-expand-customer-base-for-its-stratollite-balloon/ |url-status=live |access-date=February 18, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230216203414/https://breakingdefense.com/2022/07/way-up-in-the-air-world-view-looks-to-expand-customer-base-for-its-stratollite-balloon/ |archive-date=February 16, 2023}}</ref> By 2019, [[the Pentagon]] had invested millions in COLD STAR (Covert Long Dwell Stratospheric Architecture), a project for |
Although mostly supplanted by [[Reconnaissance satellite|surveillance satellite]]s and [[unmanned surveillance and reconnaissance aerial vehicle|unmanned aerial vehicle]]s, balloons have retained some advantages, such as a lower cost of production and deployment.<ref name="BBCFeb3">{{cite news |last1=Ng |first1=Kelly |date=February 3, 2023 |title=Why would China use a spy balloon when it has satellites? |publisher=[[BBC News]] |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-64508086 |url-status=live |access-date=February 4, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230204120702/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-64508086 |archive-date=February 4, 2023}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Hitchens |first=Theresa |date=July 28, 2022 |title=Way up in the air: World View looks to expand customer base for its 'Stratollite' balloon |work=Breaking Defense |url=https://breakingdefense.sites.breakingmedia.com/2022/07/way-up-in-the-air-world-view-looks-to-expand-customer-base-for-its-stratollite-balloon/ |url-status=live |access-date=February 18, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230216203414/https://breakingdefense.com/2022/07/way-up-in-the-air-world-view-looks-to-expand-customer-base-for-its-stratollite-balloon/ |archive-date=February 16, 2023}}</ref> By 2019, [[the Pentagon]] had invested millions in [[COLD STAR]] (Covert Long Dwell Stratospheric Architecture), a project for stealthy balloons that are now being transitioned from narcotics surveillance to military service.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Hudson |first=Lee |date=3 February 2023 |title=It's 2023. Why are militaries still using spy balloons? |language=en |website=[[Politico]] |url=https://www.politico.com/news/2023/02/03/militaries-spy-balloons-china-00081115 |access-date=2023-02-23}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Hudson |first=Lee |date=2022-07-05 |title=U.S. military's newest weapon against China and Russia: Hot air |url=https://www.politico.com/news/2022/07/05/u-s-militarys-newest-weapon-against-china-and-russia-hot-air-00043860 |access-date=2023-02-24 |website=[[Politico]]}}</ref> China recognizes the importance of catching up to foreign countries in this domain.<ref name="nytimes/2023/02/08/Barnes-balloons">{{Cite news |last1=Barnes |first1=Julian E. |last2=Wong |first2=Edward |last3=Cooper |first3=Helene |last4=Buckley |first4=Chris |date=2023-02-08 |title=China Sends Spy Balloons Over Military Sites Worldwide, U.S. Officials Say |language=en-US |work=[[The New York Times]] |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/08/us/politics/china-spy-balloons.html |access-date=2023-02-23 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> Its military publications have highlighted the use of balloons to reconnoiter enemy air defense and enhance China's own defense capabilities.<ref name="Reuters">{{cite news |last1=Baptista |first1=Eduardo |last2=Torode |first2=Greg |date=February 6, 2023 |title=China's military has shown growing interest in high-altitude balloons |publisher=[[Reuters]] |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/china/chinas-military-has-shown-growing-interest-high-altitude-balloons-2023-02-06/ |url-status=live |access-date=February 7, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230206235821/https://www.reuters.com/world/china/chinas-military-has-shown-growing-interest-high-altitude-balloons-2023-02-06/ |archive-date=February 6, 2023}}</ref> It has also flown high-altitude balloons to drop-test different [[Hypersonic glide vehicle|hypersonic missile]] designs.<ref>{{Cite news |date=2023-02-06 |title=China's military keeps rivals on edge with balloon strategy |work=[[Financial Times]] |url=https://www.ft.com/content/8a2c77c3-58cc-471d-a187-1823faa4f1b6 |url-access=subscription |access-date=2023-02-23}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Rogoway |first=Tyler |date=2018-09-22 |title=Video Appears To Show China Testing Hypersonic Glide Vehicles Via High Altitude Balloon |url=https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/23758/video-appears-to-show-china-testing-hypersonic-glide-vehicles-via-high-altitude-balloon |website=The War Zone}}</ref> |
||
==== Modern developments in China ==== |
|||
China recognizes the importance of balloon technology and shortening its gap with foreign countries.<ref name="Reuters">{{cite news |last1=Baptista |first1=Eduardo |last2=Torode |first2=Greg |date=February 6, 2023 |title=China's military has shown growing interest in high-altitude balloons |publisher=[[Reuters]] |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/china/chinas-military-has-shown-growing-interest-high-altitude-balloons-2023-02-06/ |url-status=live |access-date=February 7, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230206235821/https://www.reuters.com/world/china/chinas-military-has-shown-growing-interest-high-altitude-balloons-2023-02-06/ |archive-date=February 6, 2023}}</ref> Its military publications have highlighted the use of balloons to reconnoiter enemy air defense systems and enhance China's own air defense capabilities.<ref name="nytimes/2023/02/08/Barnes-balloons">{{Cite news |last1=Barnes |first1=Julian E. |last2=Wong |first2=Edward |last3=Cooper |first3=Helene |last4=Buckley |first4=Chris |date=2023-02-08 |title=China Sends Spy Balloons Over Military Sites Worldwide, U.S. Officials Say |language=en-US |work=[[The New York Times]] |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/08/us/politics/china-spy-balloons.html |access-date=2023-02-23 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> China has also flown high-altitude balloons to drop-test different [[Hypersonic glide vehicle|hypersonic missile]] designs.<ref>{{Cite news |date=2023-02-06 |title=China's military keeps rivals on edge with balloon strategy |work=[[Financial Times]] |url=https://www.ft.com/content/8a2c77c3-58cc-471d-a187-1823faa4f1b6 |url-access=subscription |access-date=2023-02-23}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Rogoway |first=Tyler |date=2018-09-22 |title=Video Appears To Show China Testing Hypersonic Glide Vehicles Via High Altitude Balloon |url=https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/23758/video-appears-to-show-china-testing-hypersonic-glide-vehicles-via-high-altitude-balloon |website=The War Zone}}</ref> |
|||
==== Past Chinese balloons and unidentified objects ==== |
==== Past Chinese balloons and unidentified objects ==== |
||
Line 93: | Line 90: | ||
[[File:2023 Chinese Balloon route.svg|thumb|alt=A map of the world, showing a snaking line from the middle of China, across the Pacific Ocean, through Alaska and Canada, and into the northwestern United States|Approximate route of the balloon<ref name="bbc/64514120">* {{cite news |last1=Palumbo |first1=Daniele |last2=Howells |first2=Jeremy |last3=Rivault |first3=Erwan |date=February 3, 2023 |title=China balloon: Could it have been blown off course as Beijing claims? |language=en-GB |publisher=[[BBC News]] |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-64514120 |url-status=live |access-date=February 4, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230204083949/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-64514120 |archive-date=February 4, 2023}}<br />* {{cite news |last=Petras |first=George |date=February 3, 2023 |title=US tracked suspected Chinese spy balloon for 5 days before shooting it down over the Atlantic |website=[[USA Today]] |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/graphics/2023/02/03/china-spy-balloon-path/11174459002/ |url-status=live |access-date=February 6, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230207213203/https://www.usatoday.com/story/graphics/2023/02/03/china-spy-balloon-path/11174459002/?gnt-cfr=1 |archive-date=February 7, 2023}}</ref>]] |
[[File:2023 Chinese Balloon route.svg|thumb|alt=A map of the world, showing a snaking line from the middle of China, across the Pacific Ocean, through Alaska and Canada, and into the northwestern United States|Approximate route of the balloon<ref name="bbc/64514120">* {{cite news |last1=Palumbo |first1=Daniele |last2=Howells |first2=Jeremy |last3=Rivault |first3=Erwan |date=February 3, 2023 |title=China balloon: Could it have been blown off course as Beijing claims? |language=en-GB |publisher=[[BBC News]] |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-64514120 |url-status=live |access-date=February 4, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230204083949/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-64514120 |archive-date=February 4, 2023}}<br />* {{cite news |last=Petras |first=George |date=February 3, 2023 |title=US tracked suspected Chinese spy balloon for 5 days before shooting it down over the Atlantic |website=[[USA Today]] |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/graphics/2023/02/03/china-spy-balloon-path/11174459002/ |url-status=live |access-date=February 6, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230207213203/https://www.usatoday.com/story/graphics/2023/02/03/china-spy-balloon-path/11174459002/?gnt-cfr=1 |archive-date=February 7, 2023}}</ref>]] |
||
The balloon entered U.S. airspace above the [[Aleutian Islands]] on January 28, 2023, then moved across Alaska, and entered Canadian airspace over the [[Yukon]] and [[Northwest Territories]] on January 30, 2023.<ref name="apnews/Miller/downs-balloon" /> After flying southeast over [[British Columbia]], the balloon then crossed into the U.S. in [[northern Idaho]] on January 31, and [[Montana]] on February 1,<ref name="apnews/Miller/downs-balloon" /> where it was spotted over Billings.<ref name="NYTimesFeb2" /><ref name="TimeFeb32" /> Montana is the location of multiple nuclear missile installations, including [[Malmstrom Air Force Base]], one of three U.S. Air Force bases from which [[intercontinental ballistic missile]]s are operated, causing suspicion that the balloon had been launched to surveil said nuclear installations.<ref name="NYTimesFeb2" /> A meteorological researcher calculated a possible trajectory along this path using the [[HYSPLIT]] atmospheric model, consistent with data on prevailing [[westerlies]] from China to Montana.<ref name="bbc/64514120" /> The balloon was spotted above northwest [[Missouri]], near [[Kansas City]], on February 3.<ref name="TimeFeb32" /> |
The balloon entered U.S. airspace above the [[Aleutian Islands]] on January 28, 2023, then moved across Alaska, and entered Canadian airspace over the [[Yukon]] and [[Northwest Territories]] on January 30, 2023.<ref name="apnews/Miller/downs-balloon">{{cite news |last1=Miller |first1=Zeke |last2=Balsamo |first2=Michael |last3=Long |first3=Colleen |last4=Madhani |first4=Aamer |last5=Baldor |first5=Lolita C. |date=February 5, 2023 |title=US downs Chinese balloon, drawing a threat from China |publisher=[[AP News]] |url=https://apnews.com/article/politics-united-states-government-china-antony-blinken-51e49202f2a0a50541cde059934c4cfb |url-status=live |access-date=February 5, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230204191009/https://apnews.com/article/politics-united-states-government-china-antony-blinken-51e49202f2a0a50541cde059934c4cfb |archive-date=February 4, 2023}}</ref> After flying southeast over [[British Columbia]], the balloon then crossed into the U.S. in [[northern Idaho]] on January 31, and [[Montana]] on February 1,<ref name="apnews/Miller/downs-balloon" /> where it was spotted over Billings.<ref name="NYTimesFeb2" /><ref name="TimeFeb32" /> Montana is the location of multiple nuclear missile installations, including [[Malmstrom Air Force Base]], one of three U.S. Air Force bases from which [[intercontinental ballistic missile]]s are operated, causing suspicion that the balloon had been launched to surveil said nuclear installations.<ref name="NYTimesFeb2" /> A meteorological researcher calculated a possible trajectory along this path using the [[HYSPLIT]] atmospheric model, consistent with data on prevailing [[westerlies]] from China to Montana.<ref name="bbc/64514120" /> The balloon was spotted above northwest [[Missouri]], near [[Kansas City]], on February 3.<ref name="TimeFeb32" /> |
||
An unnamed U.S. defense official told ''The Washington Post'' that the balloon was not a derelict object as it generally followed jet stream patterns but loitered when it was near sensitive sites, such as the Malmstrom AFB.<ref name="washingtonpost.com">{{Cite news |date=February 3, 2023 |title=Suspected Chinese spy balloon sightings reported across U.S. as Pentagon tracks it |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/02/03/chinese-spy-balloon/ |url-status=live |url-access=limited |access-date=February 6, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230204210259/https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/02/03/chinese-spy-balloon/ |archive-date=February 4, 2023}}</ref> The ''Post'' said that that observation undermined Chinese assertions that the balloon was a wayward device.<ref name="washingtonpost.com" /> The U.S. ground-based intercontinental nuclear arsenal is composed of about 400 [[LGM-30 Minuteman]] III missiles deployed in [[missile silo]]s around Malmstrom AFB, Montana; [[Minot Air Force Base|Minot AFB]], North Dakota; and [[Francis E. Warren Air Force Base|Francis E. Warren AFB]], Wyoming.<ref name="2009_Norris">{{cite journal |last1=Norris |first1=Robert S. |last2=Kristensen |first2=Hans M. |author-link2=Hans M. Kristensen |date= November 27, 2015 |title=U.S. Nuclear Forces, 2009 |journal=[[Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists]] |publisher=[[Taylor & Francis]] |volume=65 |issue=2 |pages=59–69 |doi=10.2968/065002008 |issn=0096-3402 |eissn=1938-3282 |lccn=48034039 |oclc=470268256 |doi-access=free}}</ref> Experts interviewed by ''Time'' said that the balloon traveled for a much longer distance than what would be expected of a standard weather balloon and that Chinese officials should not have been surprised that the balloon would have eventually either crossed the U.S. or been detected.<ref name="time/6253002" /> |
An unnamed U.S. defense official told ''The Washington Post'' that the balloon was not a derelict object as it generally followed jet stream patterns but loitered when it was near sensitive sites, such as the Malmstrom AFB.<ref name="washingtonpost.com">{{Cite news |date=February 3, 2023 |title=Suspected Chinese spy balloon sightings reported across U.S. as Pentagon tracks it |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/02/03/chinese-spy-balloon/ |url-status=live |url-access=limited |access-date=February 6, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230204210259/https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/02/03/chinese-spy-balloon/ |archive-date=February 4, 2023}}</ref> The ''Post'' said that that observation undermined Chinese assertions that the balloon was a wayward device.<ref name="washingtonpost.com" /> The U.S. ground-based intercontinental nuclear arsenal is composed of about 400 [[LGM-30 Minuteman]] III missiles deployed in [[missile silo]]s around Malmstrom AFB, Montana; [[Minot Air Force Base|Minot AFB]], North Dakota; and [[Francis E. Warren Air Force Base|Francis E. Warren AFB]], Wyoming.<ref name="2009_Norris">{{cite journal |last1=Norris |first1=Robert S. |last2=Kristensen |first2=Hans M. |author-link2=Hans M. Kristensen |date= November 27, 2015 |title=U.S. Nuclear Forces, 2009 |journal=[[Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists]] |publisher=[[Taylor & Francis]] |volume=65 |issue=2 |pages=59–69 |doi=10.2968/065002008 |issn=0096-3402 |eissn=1938-3282 |lccn=48034039 |oclc=470268256 |doi-access=free}}</ref> Experts interviewed by ''Time'' said that the balloon traveled for a much longer distance than what would be expected of a standard weather balloon and that Chinese officials should not have been surprised that the balloon would have eventually either crossed the U.S. or been detected.<ref name="time/6253002" /> |
||
Line 165: | Line 162: | ||
On February 3, spokesperson of the Chinese [[Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China|Ministry of Foreign Affairs]] [[Mao Ning (diplomat)|Mao Ning]] said: "It is a civilian airship used for research, mainly meteorological, purposes. Affected by the Westerlies and with limited self-steering capability, the airship deviated far from its planned course."<ref name="Hansler" /> She said China regretted the unintentional incident, citing ''force majeure''.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://ijr.com/china-issues-statement-following-reports-balloon/|website=[[Independent Journal Review]]|title=China Issues Statement Following Reports of a Suspected Spy Balloon Over Montana|first=Savannah|last=Rychcik|date=February 3, 2023|access-date=February 5, 2023|archive-date=February 3, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230203160942/https://ijr.com/china-issues-statement-following-reports-balloon/|url-status=live}}</ref> On February 6, Mao said that the U.S. "hyped up the incident on purpose and even used force to attack", and called the shoot down "an unacceptable and irresponsible action".<ref name=":0" /> |
On February 3, spokesperson of the Chinese [[Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China|Ministry of Foreign Affairs]] [[Mao Ning (diplomat)|Mao Ning]] said: "It is a civilian airship used for research, mainly meteorological, purposes. Affected by the Westerlies and with limited self-steering capability, the airship deviated far from its planned course."<ref name="Hansler" /> She said China regretted the unintentional incident, citing ''force majeure''.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://ijr.com/china-issues-statement-following-reports-balloon/|website=[[Independent Journal Review]]|title=China Issues Statement Following Reports of a Suspected Spy Balloon Over Montana|first=Savannah|last=Rychcik|date=February 3, 2023|access-date=February 5, 2023|archive-date=February 3, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230203160942/https://ijr.com/china-issues-statement-following-reports-balloon/|url-status=live}}</ref> On February 6, Mao said that the U.S. "hyped up the incident on purpose and even used force to attack", and called the shoot down "an unacceptable and irresponsible action".<ref name=":0" /> |
||
Chinese [[state media]] initially ignored the incident but |
According to the ''BBC'', Chinese [[state media]] initially ignored the incident but became more defensive after the "near-apologetic tone" of its Ministry of Foreign Affairs.<ref name=":3">{{Cite news |date=2023-02-14 |title=How has China reacted to the balloon saga? |language=en-GB |work=[[BBC News]] |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-64633990 |access-date=2023-03-01}}</ref> On February 3, ''[[China Daily]]'' called the spying allegation a lie, saying: "To spy on the U.S. with a balloon, one must both fall far behind to use a 1940s technology and be advanced enough to control its flight across the ocean."<ref name="GuardFeb23"/> Chinese netizens speculated about the maker of the balloon and unconfirmed reports of an unidentified object off the coast of [[Shandong]].<ref>{{cite news |last=Shoaib |first=Alia |date=February 12, 2023 |title=Chinese authorities said they were preparing to shoot down an 'unidentified flying object' spotted near the Yellow Sea |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/china-preparing-shoot-down-unidentified-flying-object-2023-2 |access-date=12 February 2023 |website=[[Business Insider]] |archive-date=February 12, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230212160845/https://www.businessinsider.com/china-preparing-shoot-down-unidentified-flying-object-2023-2 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=":3" /> The incident coincided with the release of science fiction movie ''[[The Wandering Earth 2]]'' in mainland China, causing some internet users and media to coin the name "The Wandering Balloon".<ref name="Wandering Balloon">{{cite news |last=Wu |first=Huizhong |date=February 4, 2023 |title=China tries to minimize impact of suspected spy balloon after Blinken cancels visit |work=[[PBS NewsHour]] |url=https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/china-tries-to-minimize-impact-of-suspected-spy-balloon-after-blinken-cancels-visit |url-status=live |access-date=February 9, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230209034414/https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/china-tries-to-minimize-impact-of-suspected-spy-balloon-after-blinken-cancels-visit |archive-date=February 9, 2023}}</ref> |
||
After the downing on February 5, Vice Foreign Minister [[Xie Feng (diplomat)|Xie Feng]] said he had filed a formal complaint with the U.S. Embassy in response to the incident. Xie accused the United States of indiscriminately using force against the civilian airship that was about to leave U.S. airspace in violation of "the spirit of international law and international practice" and said that the Chinese government reserved the right to "take further necessary responses".<ref name="apnews/Miller/downs-balloon" /><ref name=":0">{{cite news |title=China accuses US of indiscriminate use of force over balloon |url=https://apnews.com/article/politics-united-states-government-china-north-america-f8b1c1bbf0fe7bcf8908c45e03c582c8 |publisher=[[AP News]] |first=Emily |last=Wang Fujiyama |date=February 6, 2023 |access-date=February 7, 2023 |archive-date=February 7, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230207002250/https://apnews.com/article/politics-united-states-government-china-north-america-f8b1c1bbf0fe7bcf8908c45e03c582c8 |url-status=live}}</ref> On February 6, a Chinese diplomat said in an interview with French news network [[La Chaîne Info|LCI]] that the United States should return the recovered balloon debris to China.<ref>{{cite news |date=February 8, 2023 |title=China Says US Should Return Debris From Balloon It Shot Down |work=[[Bloomberg News]] |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-02-08/china-says-us-should-return-debris-from-balloon-it-shot-down |access-date=February 9, 2023 |archive-date=February 8, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230208135225/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-02-08/china-says-us-should-return-debris-from-balloon-it-shot-down |url-status=live }}</ref> |
After the downing on February 5, Vice Foreign Minister [[Xie Feng (diplomat)|Xie Feng]] said he had filed a formal complaint with the U.S. Embassy in response to the incident. Xie accused the United States of indiscriminately using force against the civilian airship that was about to leave U.S. airspace in violation of "the spirit of international law and international practice" and said that the Chinese government reserved the right to "take further necessary responses".<ref name="apnews/Miller/downs-balloon" /><ref name=":0">{{cite news |title=China accuses US of indiscriminate use of force over balloon |url=https://apnews.com/article/politics-united-states-government-china-north-america-f8b1c1bbf0fe7bcf8908c45e03c582c8 |publisher=[[AP News]] |first=Emily |last=Wang Fujiyama |date=February 6, 2023 |access-date=February 7, 2023 |archive-date=February 7, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230207002250/https://apnews.com/article/politics-united-states-government-china-north-america-f8b1c1bbf0fe7bcf8908c45e03c582c8 |url-status=live}}</ref> On February 6, a Chinese diplomat said in an interview with French news network [[La Chaîne Info|LCI]] that the United States should return the recovered balloon debris to China.<ref>{{cite news |date=February 8, 2023 |title=China Says US Should Return Debris From Balloon It Shot Down |work=[[Bloomberg News]] |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-02-08/china-says-us-should-return-debris-from-balloon-it-shot-down |access-date=February 9, 2023 |archive-date=February 8, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230208135225/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-02-08/china-says-us-should-return-debris-from-balloon-it-shot-down |url-status=live }}</ref> |
||
The incident coincided in timing with the release of science fiction movie ''[[The Wandering Earth 2]]'' in mainland China, causing some internet users and media to refer jokingly to the incident as "The Wandering Balloon".<ref name="Wandering Balloon">{{cite news |last=Wu |first=Huizhong |date=February 4, 2023 |title=China tries to minimize impact of suspected spy balloon after Blinken cancels visit |work=[[PBS NewsHour]] |url=https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/china-tries-to-minimize-impact-of-suspected-spy-balloon-after-blinken-cancels-visit |access-date=February 9, 2023 |archive-date=February 9, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230209034414/https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/china-tries-to-minimize-impact-of-suspected-spy-balloon-after-blinken-cancels-visit |url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
On February 12, Chinese authorities said that they had [[2023 Shandong high-altitude object|discovered an unidentified flying object]] near the [[Yellow Sea]] off eastern [[Shandong]], and were preparing to shoot it down.<ref>{{cite news |last=Shoaib |first=Alia |date=February 12, 2023 |title=Chinese authorities said they were preparing to shoot down an 'unidentified flying object' spotted near the Yellow Sea |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/china-preparing-shoot-down-unidentified-flying-object-2023-2 |access-date=12 February 2023 |website=[[Business Insider]] |archive-date=February 12, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230212160845/https://www.businessinsider.com/china-preparing-shoot-down-unidentified-flying-object-2023-2 |url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
On February 13, Chinese Foreign Affairs spokesperson [[Wang Wenbin]] said that U.S. high-altitude balloons had "illegally crossed China's airspace" more than ten times since 2022. According to CNN, he did not offer evidence. Wang also complained about U.S. reconnaissance against China and wiretapping efforts around the world.<ref name="Nectar Gan 2023">{{cite news |last1=Gan |first1=Nectar |last2=Chang |first2=Wayne |date=February 13, 2023 |title=China accuses US of 'illegally' flying balloons across its airspace |publisher=[[CNN]] |url=https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/13/china/china-unidentified-flying-object-intl-hnk-mic/index.html |url-status=live |access-date=February 13, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230214113449/https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/13/china/china-unidentified-flying-object-intl-hnk-mic/index.html |archive-date=February 14, 2023}}</ref> U.S. National Security spokesperson John Kirby said "there is no U.S. surveillance craft in China's airspace" but declined to specify whether his denial covered disputed airspace claimed by China.<ref>{{Cite news |last= |date=2023-02-13 |title=No U.S. surveillance craft in China's airspace, White House says |language=en |work=[[Reuters]] |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/us/white-house-no-us-surveillance-craft-chinas-airspace-2023-02-13/ |access-date=2023-02-23}}</ref> On February 14, Wang elaborated by saying that since 2022, circumnavigation balloons launched from U.S. soil flew over China and other countries illegally more than ten times.<ref>{{cite web |date=February 14, 2023 |title=2023年2月14日外交部发言人汪文斌主持例行记者会 |url=https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/fyrbt_673021/202302/t20230214_11024982.shtml |website=[[Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China]] |language=zh}}</ref> |
On February 13, Chinese Foreign Affairs spokesperson [[Wang Wenbin]] said that U.S. high-altitude balloons had "illegally crossed China's airspace" more than ten times since 2022. According to CNN, he did not offer evidence. Wang also complained about U.S. reconnaissance against China and wiretapping efforts around the world.<ref name="Nectar Gan 2023">{{cite news |last1=Gan |first1=Nectar |last2=Chang |first2=Wayne |date=February 13, 2023 |title=China accuses US of 'illegally' flying balloons across its airspace |publisher=[[CNN]] |url=https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/13/china/china-unidentified-flying-object-intl-hnk-mic/index.html |url-status=live |access-date=February 13, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230214113449/https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/13/china/china-unidentified-flying-object-intl-hnk-mic/index.html |archive-date=February 14, 2023}}</ref> U.S. National Security spokesperson John Kirby said "there is no U.S. surveillance craft in China's airspace" but declined to specify whether his denial covered disputed airspace claimed by China.<ref>{{Cite news |last= |date=2023-02-13 |title=No U.S. surveillance craft in China's airspace, White House says |language=en |work=[[Reuters]] |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/us/white-house-no-us-surveillance-craft-chinas-airspace-2023-02-13/ |access-date=2023-02-23}}</ref> On February 14, Wang elaborated by saying that since 2022, circumnavigation balloons launched from U.S. soil flew over China and other countries illegally more than ten times.<ref>{{cite web |date=February 14, 2023 |title=2023年2月14日外交部发言人汪文斌主持例行记者会 |url=https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/fyrbt_673021/202302/t20230214_11024982.shtml |website=[[Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China]] |language=zh}}</ref> |
||
Line 208: | Line 201: | ||
The incident was [[satirized]] for the show ''[[Saturday Night Live]]'' the evening after it was shot down.<ref>{{Cite AV media |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gG3kUa8uM4c |title=Spy Balloon Cold Open - SNL |date=Feb 4, 2023 |publisher=[[Saturday Night Live]] |access-date=2023-02-19 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230218044955/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gG3kUa8uM4c |archive-date=2023-02-18 |url-status=live |via=YouTube}}</ref> In the sketch, performer [[Bowen Yang]] portrayed an [[anthropomorphized]] depiction of the downed balloon being interviewed by [[MSNBC]] journalist [[Katy Tur]] (played by [[Chloe Fineman]]).<ref>{{cite magazine |last=Stern |first=Marlow |date=February 5, 2023 |title=SNL Airs Hilarious Interview With Bowen Yang's Chinese Spy Balloon |url=https://www.rollingstone.com/tv-movies/tv-movie-features/snl-hilarious-interview-bowen-yang-chinese-spy-balloon-chloe-fineman-1234673857/ |url-status=live |magazine=[[Rolling Stone]] |language=en-US |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230205163123/https://www.rollingstone.com/tv-movies/tv-movie-features/snl-hilarious-interview-bowen-yang-chinese-spy-balloon-chloe-fineman-1234673857/ |archive-date=February 5, 2023 |access-date=February 6, 2023}}</ref> Some sources paid particular attention to Yang's line, "Congrats! You shot a balloon!", with ''[[USA Today]]'' using it in the headline of its coverage.<ref>{{cite news |last=Alexander |first=Bryan |title='SNL': MSNBC lands exclusive interview with Chinese spy balloon: 'Congrats! You shot a balloon' |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/tv/2023/02/04/snl-msnbc-chinese-spy-balloon-interviewed-cold-open/11191048002/ |access-date=February 6, 2023 |website=[[USA Today]] |language=en-US |archive-date=February 7, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230207041833/https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/tv/2023/02/04/snl-msnbc-chinese-spy-balloon-interviewed-cold-open/11191048002/ |url-status=live}}</ref> |
The incident was [[satirized]] for the show ''[[Saturday Night Live]]'' the evening after it was shot down.<ref>{{Cite AV media |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gG3kUa8uM4c |title=Spy Balloon Cold Open - SNL |date=Feb 4, 2023 |publisher=[[Saturday Night Live]] |access-date=2023-02-19 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230218044955/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gG3kUa8uM4c |archive-date=2023-02-18 |url-status=live |via=YouTube}}</ref> In the sketch, performer [[Bowen Yang]] portrayed an [[anthropomorphized]] depiction of the downed balloon being interviewed by [[MSNBC]] journalist [[Katy Tur]] (played by [[Chloe Fineman]]).<ref>{{cite magazine |last=Stern |first=Marlow |date=February 5, 2023 |title=SNL Airs Hilarious Interview With Bowen Yang's Chinese Spy Balloon |url=https://www.rollingstone.com/tv-movies/tv-movie-features/snl-hilarious-interview-bowen-yang-chinese-spy-balloon-chloe-fineman-1234673857/ |url-status=live |magazine=[[Rolling Stone]] |language=en-US |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230205163123/https://www.rollingstone.com/tv-movies/tv-movie-features/snl-hilarious-interview-bowen-yang-chinese-spy-balloon-chloe-fineman-1234673857/ |archive-date=February 5, 2023 |access-date=February 6, 2023}}</ref> Some sources paid particular attention to Yang's line, "Congrats! You shot a balloon!", with ''[[USA Today]]'' using it in the headline of its coverage.<ref>{{cite news |last=Alexander |first=Bryan |title='SNL': MSNBC lands exclusive interview with Chinese spy balloon: 'Congrats! You shot a balloon' |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/tv/2023/02/04/snl-msnbc-chinese-spy-balloon-interviewed-cold-open/11191048002/ |access-date=February 6, 2023 |website=[[USA Today]] |language=en-US |archive-date=February 7, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230207041833/https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/tv/2023/02/04/snl-msnbc-chinese-spy-balloon-interviewed-cold-open/11191048002/ |url-status=live}}</ref> |
||
== Other high-altitude objects == |
|||
== Further incursions and responses == |
|||
{{further|List of high-altitude object events in 2023}} |
{{further|List of high-altitude object events in 2023}} |
||
Another balloon was detected flying over Latin America.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-02-06 |title=Second Chinese balloon confirmed over Latin America |url=https://www.dw.com/en/second-chinese-balloon-confirmed-over-latin-america/a-64618457 |website=Deutsche Welle}}</ref> The [[Dirección General de Aviación Civil (Costa Rica)|Costa Rican General Directorate of Civil Aviation]] confirmed the incursion by an object "not of Costa Rican origin", which the locals had first seen on February 2.<ref>{{cite news |date=February 5, 2023 |title=Speculation About Balloon Seen Over Costa Rica Continues |work=[[The Tico Times]] |url=https://ticotimes.net/2023/02/05/speculation-about-balloon-seen-over-costa-rica-continues |url-status=live |access-date=February 6, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230206004939/https://ticotimes.net/2023/02/05/speculation-about-balloon-seen-over-costa-rica-continues |archive-date=February 6, 2023}}</ref> The [[Colombian Air Force]] said that on the morning of February 3, it had detected an object with "characteristics similar to those of a balloon" at a height of {{convert|55000|ft|m}} and traveling at a speed of {{convert|25|knots|abbr=off}}, and after determining it was not a threat to national security and defense or to air safety, had continued to track it until it left Colombian airspace.<ref name=bloom/><ref>{{cite news |date=February 4, 2023 |title=Fuerza Aérea detectó un objeto similar a un globo sobre cielo colombiano |language=es |trans-title=Air Force detected a balloon-like object over Colombian sky |work=[[El Universal (Cartagena)|El Universal]] |url=https://www.eluniversal.com.co/colombia/fuerza-aerea-detecto-un-objeto-similar-a-un-globo-sobre-cielo-colombiano-FD7858766 |access-date=February 5, 2023 |archive-date=February 5, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230205191046/https://www.eluniversal.com.co/colombia/fuerza-aerea-detecto-un-objeto-similar-a-un-globo-sobre-cielo-colombiano-FD7858766 |url-status=live}}</ref> Sightings of the balloon were also reported from Venezuela,<ref>{{cite news |last1=Hutzler |first1=Alexandra |last2=Cathey |first2=Libby |last3=Deliso |first3=Meredith |last4=Guerilus |first4=Stephanie |title=Chinese balloon live updates: Second balloon flying over South America: Pentagon |publisher=[[ABC News]] |url=https://abcnews.go.com/US/live-updates/china-spy-balloon/?id=96874279#96889587 |url-status=live |access-date=February 4, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230203145011/https://abcnews.go.com/US/live-updates/china-spy-balloon/?id=96874279 |archive-date=February 3, 2023}}</ref> specifically from [[Maracaibo]].<ref name=":1">{{cite news |date=February 9, 2023 |title=Un globo espía chino también flotó sobre Maracaibo pero Maduro ignoró su visita |language=es |trans-title=Chinese spy balloon also hovered over Maracaibo but Maduro ignored its visit |website=[[La Patilla]] |url=https://www.lapatilla.com/2023/02/09/globo-espia-maracaibo/ |access-date=2023-02-12 |archive-date=February 12, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230212142814/https://www.lapatilla.com/2023/02/09/globo-espia-maracaibo/ |url-status=live}}</ref> The U.S. Department of Defense confirmed those sightings and called the object another Chinese surveillance balloon.<ref name="Gregorian">{{Cite news |last1=Gregorian |first1=Dareh |last2=Kube |first2=Courtney |last3=Gains |first3=Mosheh |last4=Richards |first4=Zoë |title=Another Chinese 'surveillance balloon' is flying over Latin America, Pentagon says |publisher=[[NBC News]] |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/chinese-balloon-cause-civilian-injuries-deaths-rcna69052 |url-status=live |access-date=February 4, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230204014550/https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/chinese-balloon-cause-civilian-injuries-deaths-rcna69052 |archive-date=February 4, 2023}}</ref> On February 6, Mao Ning, the spokeswoman for the Chinese government, confirmed the balloon belongs to China, but said that it was used for "flight tests" and was blown off-course in much the same manner as the one spotted over North America.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Wang |first1=Selina |last2=Change |first2=Wayne |date=February 6, 2023 |title=Balloon over Latin America belongs to China, Beijing says |publisher=[[CNN]] |url=https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/06/asia/china-balloon-latin-america-intl/index.html |url-status=live |access-date=February 6, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230206142230/https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/06/asia/china-balloon-latin-america-intl/index.html |archive-date=February 6, 2023}}</ref><ref name="BBC News">{{cite news |date=February 6, 2023 |title=Second balloon over Latin America is ours – China |language=en-GB |publisher=[[BBC News]] |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-64537098 |url-status=live |access-date=February 6, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230206113713/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-64537098 |archive-date=February 6, 2023}}</ref> |
|||
On February 10, [[2023 Alaska high-altitude object|another high-altitude object]] was shot down on the vicinity of [[Deadhorse, Alaska]], over the [[Beaufort Sea]];<ref>{{cite news |last=Downing |first=Suzanne |date=February 10, 2023 |title=Breaking: Air Force shoots down item over Prudhoe; temporary flight restriction over Deadhorse, as Air Force C-130 circles Prudhoe Bay |url=https://mustreadalaska.com/breaking-temporary-flight-restriction-over-deadhorse-as-air-force-c-130-circles-prudhoe-bay/ |access-date=2023-02-12 |website=Must Read Alaska |language=en-US |archive-date=February 12, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230212133208/https://mustreadalaska.com/breaking-temporary-flight-restriction-over-deadhorse-as-air-force-c-130-circles-prudhoe-bay/ |url-status=live}}</ref> recovery efforts by the [[Alaska National Guard]] on the [[sea ice]] are on-going. |
On February 10, [[2023 Alaska high-altitude object|another high-altitude object]] was shot down on the vicinity of [[Deadhorse, Alaska]], over the [[Beaufort Sea]];<ref>{{cite news |last=Downing |first=Suzanne |date=February 10, 2023 |title=Breaking: Air Force shoots down item over Prudhoe; temporary flight restriction over Deadhorse, as Air Force C-130 circles Prudhoe Bay |url=https://mustreadalaska.com/breaking-temporary-flight-restriction-over-deadhorse-as-air-force-c-130-circles-prudhoe-bay/ |access-date=2023-02-12 |website=Must Read Alaska |language=en-US |archive-date=February 12, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230212133208/https://mustreadalaska.com/breaking-temporary-flight-restriction-over-deadhorse-as-air-force-c-130-circles-prudhoe-bay/ |url-status=live}}</ref> recovery efforts by the [[Alaska National Guard]] on the [[sea ice]] are on-going. |
||
Line 220: | Line 213: | ||
On February 14, the US government announced that the latter three high-altitude objects shot down over the North America were likely private entities with no relations to China. Further analysis and debris collections were underway.<ref name=":4">{{cite news |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-02-14/us-says-mystery-objects-likely-private-craft-not-tied-to-spying |title=US Says 3 Mystery Objects Likely Private, With No China Link |website=[[Bloomberg News]] |date=14 February 2024 |first1=Jordan |last1=Fabian |first2=Courtney |last2=McBride |first3=Laura |last3=Litvan |access-date=February 15, 2023 |archive-date=February 14, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230214211910/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-02-14/us-says-mystery-objects-likely-private-craft-not-tied-to-spying |url-status=live}}</ref> The four AIM-9X missiles expended for shooting down the three objects cost at least $1.5 million.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Viswanatha |first=Nancy A. Youssef and Aruna |title=Pentagon Spent At Least $1.5 Million on Missiles to Down Three High-Altitude Objects |website=[[The Wall Street Journal]] |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/pentagon-spent-at-least-1-5-million-on-missiles-to-down-three-high-altitude-objects-b358e522 |url-access=subscription |access-date=2023-02-26}}</ref> |
On February 14, the US government announced that the latter three high-altitude objects shot down over the North America were likely private entities with no relations to China. Further analysis and debris collections were underway.<ref name=":4">{{cite news |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-02-14/us-says-mystery-objects-likely-private-craft-not-tied-to-spying |title=US Says 3 Mystery Objects Likely Private, With No China Link |website=[[Bloomberg News]] |date=14 February 2024 |first1=Jordan |last1=Fabian |first2=Courtney |last2=McBride |first3=Laura |last3=Litvan |access-date=February 15, 2023 |archive-date=February 14, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230214211910/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-02-14/us-says-mystery-objects-likely-private-craft-not-tied-to-spying |url-status=live}}</ref> The four AIM-9X missiles expended for shooting down the three objects cost at least $1.5 million.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Viswanatha |first=Nancy A. Youssef and Aruna |title=Pentagon Spent At Least $1.5 Million on Missiles to Down Three High-Altitude Objects |website=[[The Wall Street Journal]] |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/pentagon-spent-at-least-1-5-million-on-missiles-to-down-three-high-altitude-objects-b358e522 |url-access=subscription |access-date=2023-02-26}}</ref> |
||
On February 17, the US and Canada suspended their search for the debris from the downed objects and the missile that missed.<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Weinberger |first1=Sharon |last2=Vlahou |first2=Toula |title=U.S., Canada Abandon Search for Downed Objects |website=[[The Wall Street Journal]] |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-military-ends-search-for-flying-objects-downed-over-lake-huron-and-alaska-7108cfdc |url-access=subscription}}</ref><ref name="BBC Abandoned"/> |
On February 17, the US and Canada suspended their search for the debris from the downed objects and the missile that missed.<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Weinberger |first1=Sharon |last2=Vlahou |first2=Toula |title=U.S., Canada Abandon Search for Downed Objects |website=[[The Wall Street Journal]] |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-military-ends-search-for-flying-objects-downed-over-lake-huron-and-alaska-7108cfdc |url-access=subscription}}</ref><ref name="BBC Abandoned">{{cite news |date=2023-02-18 |title=US and Canada abandon search for three flying objects shot down |language=en-GB |work=[[BBC News]] |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-64687038 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230225131615/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-64687038 |archive-date=February 25, 2023}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last1=Weinberger |first1=Sharon |last2=Vlahou |first2=Toula |date=18 February 2023 |title=U.S., Canada Abandon Search for Downed Objects |website=[[The Wall Street Journal]] |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-military-ends-search-for-flying-objects-downed-over-lake-huron-and-alaska-7108cfdc |url-access=subscription}}</ref> |
||
== See also == |
== See also == |
Revision as of 00:03, 6 March 2023
![]() The balloon photographed over the Central United States from a U.S. Air Force U-2 on February 3 | |
Date | January 28 – February 4, 2023 |
---|---|
Standort | Airspace over the United States, Canada, and territorial waters |
Typ | Airspace violation; diplomatic incident |
Cause | High-altitude Chinese balloons entering foreign airspace |
Motive | United States and Canada allege reconnaissance; China claims meteorology and force majeure due to westerlies |
Participants | U.S. and Canada: |
Outcome | Balloon downed by an AIM-9 Sidewinder fired by a U.S. Air Force F-22 Raptor; debris recovered[1] |
From January 28 to February 4, 2023, a Chinese-operated high-altitude balloon was spotted in North American airspace, including Alaska, western Canada, and the contiguous United States.[2] On February 4, the U.S. Air Force shot down the balloon over U.S. territorial waters off the coast of South Carolina, on the order of U.S. President Joe Biden.[3][4][5] Debris from the wreckage was recovered and sent to an FBI Laboratory in Quantico, Virginia, for analysis.[1]
The American and Canadian militaries announced that the balloon was for surveillance, while the Chinese government maintained it was a civilian (mainly meteorological) airship that had been blown off course.[6] The U.S. said that the balloon was capable of geolocating electronic communications and carried intelligence surveillance equipment inconsistent with that of a weather balloon.[7] It added that similar Chinese spy balloons have flown over more than 40 nations.[8][7] Analysts said that its flight path and structural characteristics were dissimilar from those of a typical weather balloon.[9][10][11] American officials later disclosed that they had been tracking the Chinese balloon since it was launched from Hainan. Its original destinations were likely Guam and Hawaii,[a] but prevailing winds blew it off course and across North America.[13]
The incident increased U.S.–China tensions. The United States has called the balloon's presence a violation of its sovereignty, and its Secretary of State Antony Blinken postponed a long-awaited diplomatic visit to Beijing.[14][15][16] Canada summoned the Chinese ambassador in response to the incident.[17]
On February 2, a similar Chinese balloon was observed flying over Latin America. In the United States, three other high-altitude objects, over Northern Alaska (February 10),[18] Yukon (February 11),[19] and Lake Huron (February 11–12) respectively, were detected and subsequently shot down; later assessment said they had no relations to China.[20][21]
Background
Spy balloon history and technology
The earliest record of military ballooning shows sky lanterns being used for signaling in 3rd century China. In the west, balloons became valued for their role in observing the battlefield and directing artillery. Their usage peaked during World War I, after which they were increasingly replaced with airplanes.[22] During the Cold War, the United States sent hundreds of reconnaissance balloons, ostensibly for "meteorological survey" under Project Genetrix, over China and other Eastern Bloc countries to gain intelligence on their nuclear capabilities, despite their protests.[23]
Although mostly supplanted by surveillance satellites and unmanned aerial vehicles, balloons have retained some advantages, such as a lower cost of production and deployment.[24][25] By 2019, the Pentagon had invested millions in COLD STAR (Covert Long Dwell Stratospheric Architecture), a project for stealthy balloons that are now being transitioned from narcotics surveillance to military service.[26][27] China recognizes the importance of catching up to foreign countries in this domain.[28] Its military publications have highlighted the use of balloons to reconnoiter enemy air defense and enhance China's own defense capabilities.[29] It has also flown high-altitude balloons to drop-test different hypersonic missile designs.[30][31]
Past Chinese balloons and unidentified objects
Suspected Chinese surveillance balloons had been detected in U.S. airspace in the past,[32][33] namely over Guam, Hawaii, and Florida.[34][35][36] One occurred earlier during Joe Biden's presidency (2021–present)[36][37] and three occurred during Donald Trump's presidency (2017–2021).[36][37][38] They did not persist as long as the 2023 incident, and China was able to recover those balloons.[37] Other pre-2023 incursions have remained unexplained, classified by U.S. authorities as Unidentified aerial phenomena.[39] The commander of United States Northern Command (USNORTHCOM), General Glen VanHerck, said that the U.S. failure to detect and identify all such incursions was "a domain awareness gap that we have to figure out".[40][41][42]
The U.S. Department of State said that a fleet of Chinese balloons have flown over more than forty countries and linked the surveillance activity to the Chinese military.[43][44][45] In 2020 and 2021, similar balloons were sighted in Sendai and Hachinohe, Japan respectively, but they were not identified as of Chinese origin at the time.[46][47] A similar aircraft was sighted in January 2022 over India's strategically important Andaman and Nicobar islands.[48][49] In February 2022, several balloons were detected off the coast of Taiwan, which their Ministry of National Defense said were likely for meteorological observations for the PLA's Eastern Theater Command.[50] Another crashed near Taiwan in February 2023, carrying an antenna, a transmitter, temperature and humidity sensors, and was likely from China as well.[51]
U.S.–China tensions
The 2023 balloon incident occurred while U.S.–China relations were at their worst in decades,[52] following suspected incidents of Chinese espionage[b] and amid increasing strategic competition in military and economic sectors.[53] In 2022, the United States, along with some of its allies, imposed stringent export controls on "foundational technologies", such as semiconductor microprocessors, to China in order to hamper latter's development of advanced technology and military tools.[52] It has also sought to maintain critical supply chains independent from China.[52]
Incident
Balloon
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/75/Chinese_Balloon_Size_Comparison.svg/220px-Chinese_Balloon_Size_Comparison.svg.png)
Size, propulsion, and payload
The balloon carried an underslung payload described as a "technology bay" estimated to be the size of "two or three school buses"[c] and was powered by sixteen solar arrays mounted on the payload. The balloon was 200 feet (61 m) tall according to U.S. General Glen D. VanHerck.[55] AI startup Synthetaic, using image data from Planet Labs spacecraft, reported the balloon's diameter as 148 feet (45 m).[56] USNORTHCOM and NORAD Commander, General Glen VanHerck, estimated the payload weighed more than 2,000 pounds (910 kg).[57]
National Security Council spokesman Admiral John Kirby said the craft had a propeller and could be maneuvered.[58] U.S. officials told foreign diplomats in Beijing that the craft had rudders and propellers.[59] A Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson said it had "limited self-steering capability".[60]
The U.S. Department of Defense said the balloon did not present a military or physical threat to people on the ground while it remained in the air, and that shooting it down over water would be safer and increased the opportunity to study the wreckage for intelligence purposes.[61][62][63]
Citing a PLA procurement portal, a U.S. official said that the balloon was manufactured by a civilian Chinese defense contractor.[64]
Signals intelligence capabilities
Experts noted that weather balloons typically are about 20 feet (6 m) wide, less than a quarter of the Chinese balloon's diameter.[9][10] Those interviewed by BBC News said it was unusual for weather balloons to last as long as the one involved in the incident and that the balloon "might have been more sophisticated than China claims".[11]
Images from U-2 flybys and forensic analysis of the payload showed antennas that likely were used for collecting and transmitting signals intelligence.[65][66] A publicly released U.S. State Department document, after the balloon was downed and debris collected, said that the balloon's solar arrays produced sufficient power to operate "multiple active intelligence collection sensors" and that the antennas on the balloon could collect and geolocate communications, including radio and mobile phone signals, but it was unknown if any specific devices were targets.[7] Former U.S. Air Force Lt. General Charles "Tuna" Moore said that the surveillance technology aboard was inconsistent with meteorological missions and hypothesized that the Chinese would be interested in finding vulnerabilities and "building a picture of our radar, weapon system and communication capabilities".[8]
U.S. authorities did not name the manufacturer of the balloon but said with high confidence that the entity has "direct commercial ties" to the People's Liberation Army. They cited this as an example of military-civil fusion, where China encourages competition from and technology exchange with its private sector in an attempt to overcome the inefficiencies and corruption of its state-owned defense corporations.[7]
Detection
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f0/Chinese_surveillance_balloon_over_Billings%2C_MT.jpg/200px-Chinese_surveillance_balloon_over_Billings%2C_MT.jpg)
High-altitude balloons are extremely difficult to detect. A 2005 study by the U.S. Air Force's Air University states surveillance balloons often present very small radar cross-sections, "on the order of hundredths of a square meter, about the same as a small bird", and essentially no infrared signature, which complicates the use of anti-aircraft weapons.[62][70] A 2009 research paper by a USAF officer stated that balloons "are inherently stealthy" due to a tiny infrared signature at high altitude (as the balloon possesses no engines) and because of the difficulty of radar detection (as the balloons lack sharp edges and metal structures).[71]
The balloon's first reported sighting was on February 1, 2023, when civilians on a commercial airliner spotted it.[72] On the same day, former Billings Gazette editor Chase Doak[73] spotted the object above Billings, Montana, after seeing reports that the airspace around Billings was closed. He had initially assumed it was a star or a UFO.[69] Doak contacted his friend and Billings Gazette photographer Larry Mayer,[74] and the two photographed the balloon using telephoto lenses. Mayer also sent the images to various government agencies.[74] After the photographs were published in the Billings Gazette and received widespread media coverage, the U.S. Department of Defense and the Canadian Department of National Defence announced on February 2 that NORAD was aware of a high-altitude surveillance balloon believed to belong to China and had been tracking it for "several" days.[75][76] The balloon was flying at an altitude of 60,000 feet (18,000 m) over Billings at the time.[61]
American defense officials considered shooting the balloon down but initially decided not to due to the risk of debris injuring civilians on the ground.[77] A meeting was convened between Secretary of Defense Austin, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Mark Milley, NORTHCOM/NORAD Commander General VanHerck, and other military commanders.[75] Biden was advised by officials not to shoot it down because debris could threaten civilians or cause property damage.[75]
Flight path
![A map of the world, showing a snaking line from the middle of China, across the Pacific Ocean, through Alaska and Canada, and into the northwestern United States](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b8/2023_Chinese_Balloon_route.svg/220px-2023_Chinese_Balloon_route.svg.png)
The balloon entered U.S. airspace above the Aleutian Islands on January 28, 2023, then moved across Alaska, and entered Canadian airspace over the Yukon and Northwest Territories on January 30, 2023.[79] After flying southeast over British Columbia, the balloon then crossed into the U.S. in northern Idaho on January 31, and Montana on February 1,[79] where it was spotted over Billings.[76][61] Montana is the location of multiple nuclear missile installations, including Malmstrom Air Force Base, one of three U.S. Air Force bases from which intercontinental ballistic missiles are operated, causing suspicion that the balloon had been launched to surveil said nuclear installations.[76] A meteorological researcher calculated a possible trajectory along this path using the HYSPLIT atmospheric model, consistent with data on prevailing westerlies from China to Montana.[78] The balloon was spotted above northwest Missouri, near Kansas City, on February 3.[61]
An unnamed U.S. defense official told The Washington Post that the balloon was not a derelict object as it generally followed jet stream patterns but loitered when it was near sensitive sites, such as the Malmstrom AFB.[80] The Post said that that observation undermined Chinese assertions that the balloon was a wayward device.[80] The U.S. ground-based intercontinental nuclear arsenal is composed of about 400 LGM-30 Minuteman III missiles deployed in missile silos around Malmstrom AFB, Montana; Minot AFB, North Dakota; and Francis E. Warren AFB, Wyoming.[81] Experts interviewed by Time said that the balloon traveled for a much longer distance than what would be expected of a standard weather balloon and that Chinese officials should not have been surprised that the balloon would have eventually either crossed the U.S. or been detected.[10]
The balloon was flying at an altitude of 60,000 feet (18,000 m). In comparison, the Concorde was the only commercial airliner to fly at 60,000 feet (18,000 m). Business jets can reach 51,000 feet (16,000 m), current commercial airliners can reach 45,000 feet (14,000 m), and the SR-71 had reached 90,000 feet (27,000 m).[82]
U.S. monitoring and counterintelligence
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e2/U-2_Pilot_over_Central_Continental_United_States_%287644960%29.jpg/220px-U-2_Pilot_over_Central_Continental_United_States_%287644960%29.jpg)
During the incident, a U.S. defense official stated that the balloon had "limited additive value from an intelligence collection perspective". Nonetheless, the Pentagon took steps to protect its assets from leaking sensitive information to the balloon.[83] U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin said the U.S. military was able to collect valuable intelligence on the balloon while it was transiting North America.[22][84] VanHerck said that the U.S. Department of Defense obtained special authorization to collect intelligence against the balloon within the U.S.[85]
Two F-22 Raptors were scrambled from Nellis Air Force Base after the balloon was spotted on February 1.[86] It was also monitored by crewed aircraft deployed by NORAD, including a Boeing E-3 Sentry Airborne Early Warning and Control System (AWACS), a Boeing RC-135 reconnaissance aircraft,[77] a U-2S Dragon Lady,[87] and another F-22 Raptor from Langley Air Force Base.[88] The U.S. Department of Defense said that, during the balloon's overflight of the United States, it had blocked the balloon from gathering intelligence and was able to study the balloon and its equipment.[63][89] Additionally, CNN reported that the US was able to track and monitor the balloon by its signals. However, the balloon seemed to stop transmitting once the US learned about it.[90]
A U.S. government official said that at least two U-2S reconnaissance aircraft were used to gather data about the balloon while it was over the Midwest, though it was not clear at which points in the balloon's flight it was tracked by U-2S aircraft.[85] The War Zone commented that the U-2S's high flight ceiling, exceeding 70,000 feet (21,000 m), allowed it to observe the balloon from within relatively close proximity (including from above), and its electronic warfare suite allowed the aircraft to potentially jam or monitor any radio emissions from the balloon, such as data transmissions directed upwards towards Chinese communications satellites.[85]
Downing
On February 4, the balloon had drifted over the Carolinas.[91] The Federal Aviation Administration closed airspace over the area in one of the largest temporary flight restrictions in U.S. history, "more than five times the restricted airspace surrounding Washington, D.C., and nearly double the area of the state of Massachusetts".[92] A ground stop was ordered on the coast at Myrtle Beach International Airport and Charleston International Airport in South Carolina, and Wilmington International Airport in North Carolina.[93][94][95] Military aircraft were reported to be over the Carolinas.[96] U.S. officials later stated that this was in preparation for the eventual downing of the balloon within American territorial waters over the Atlantic Ocean.[79]
The balloon was shot down over U.S. territorial waters off the coast of Surfside Beach, South Carolina, by an AIM-9X Sidewinder missile fired from a U.S. Air Force F-22 Raptor that had departed from Langley Air Force Base; the downing occurred at 2:39 p.m. eastern time.[4][97][5] The F-22 fired the missile at an altitude of 58,000 feet (18,000 m), which struck the balloon at an altitude of 60,000–65,000 feet (18–20 km). The balloon splashed down within U.S. territorial waters 6 nautical miles (11 km) off the coastline, where the water was 47 feet (14 m) deep. The downing was the first recorded by a F-22 aircraft, the first of an aircraft over U.S. territory since World War II, and is speculated to be the highest altitude air-to-air kill in recorded history.[98]
Debris recovery
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e3/Chinese_Balloon_Envelope_Recovery.jpg/220px-Chinese_Balloon_Envelope_Recovery.jpg)
Debris from the balloon was dispersed over an area of 2.25 square kilometres (0.87 sq mi),[99] where the ocean was about 47 feet (14 m) deep and collection efforts were initiated for further inspection.[100][63] VanHerck said the United States Navy was conducting recovery operations while the U.S. Coast Guard was securing the region where the debris fell.[101] Guided-missile destroyer USS Oscar Austin, guided-missile cruiser USS Philippine Sea, and dock landing ship USS Carter Hall were tasked with retrieving the balloon wreckage, alongside Coast Guard cutters and helicopters, U.S. Navy divers, and FBI counterintelligence agents.[102][103][104] General VanHerck stated that unmanned underwater vehicles controlled from rigid inflatable boats used side-scan sonar to locate the sunken debris. The unmanned submersibles analyzed the wreckage to identify potential threats to recovery divers, such as explosives or batteries with hazardous materials.[57] The sunken payload was estimated to weigh more than 2,000 pounds (910 kg).[57]
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d9/FBI_processing_Chinese_balloon_debris.jpg/220px-FBI_processing_Chinese_balloon_debris.jpg)
On February 6, some of the downed payload was sent to the FBI Laboratory in Quantico, Virginia, for forensic analysis by the Bureau's Operational Technology Division.[1][106] Possible balloon debris was spotted later on the South Carolina coast, where police were asking residents to report other sightings.[107] China said it wanted the wreckage returned,[108][109] but the U.S. said it had no plans to do so.[1]
By February 13, the U.S. had recovered a significant portion of the balloon's payload off the South Carolina coast. The payload measured 30 feet (9.1 m) and had all of the craft's equipment and antennas.[110][111] NORTHCOM said: "Recovery operations near South Carolina continue. Crews have been able to recover significant debris from the site, including all of the priority sensor and electronics pieces identified as well as large sections of the structure. Weather permitted crane operations at the site late last week. Due to weather today [February 14], underwater recovery activities are limited but will resume as conditions permit."[111][110]
On February 17, the U.S. military said that recovery operations have concluded for the balloon after the final debris was located and retrieved.[112]
Legality of airspace and downing
The United States asserts sovereignty of the airspace above its territories. Like that of other countries, this right, up to the ill-defined boundary of space, is recognized by the Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation. Foreign aircraft are generally permitted to transit through U.S. airspace but must follow specific procedures and regulations. Article 8 of the convention states that aircraft flown without pilots must obtain permission from the country below and must be controlled to reduce danger.[113]
Before the revelation by the United States that the balloon was likely blown off course, analysts concluded that shooting it down was legal under U.S. domestic law.[114][115][116] Its destruction under international law is murkier due to potential intervening factors such as force majeure, but characterizing it as an act of reprisal would help firm up that position.[117] Although China protested the shootdown, Julian Ku, professor of law at Hofstra University, said that the wording of China's statement reflects its Ministry of Foreign Affairs "does not believe downing the balloon is a clear legal violation."[118]
Response and reactions
Vereinigte Staaten
Secretary of State Blinken postponed a scheduled diplomatic trip to China in response, which would have been the first such visit since 2018.[6][15][16] The White House did not want to announce the balloon's incursion to protect Blinken's visit, but press and social media interest made Pentagon officials comment.[73]
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/eb/F-22_Raptor_taking_off_-_2023_Chinese_balloon_incident_%28230204-F-PG418-1230%29.jpg/220px-F-22_Raptor_taking_off_-_2023_Chinese_balloon_incident_%28230204-F-PG418-1230%29.jpg)
In response to questions regarding the situation, on February 4, Biden said, "We're going to take care of it".[119] Later that day, U.S. officials disclosed that three days earlier he had granted permission to down the balloon.[79]
Pentagon officials stated that there was no earlier opportunity to shoot down over water, rebutting Trump and other Republicans who criticized the Biden administration for not shooting down the balloon earlier.[63][120] Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer added: "The bottom line here is that shooting down the balloon over water wasn't just the safest option, but it was the one that maximized our intel gain."[121]
External image | |
---|---|
![]() |
On February 6, U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman briefed 150 diplomats from about 40 embassies on China's balloon surveillance program,[124] said by U.S. officials to have been operated for several years by the People's Liberation Army from Hainan on China's south coast, as part of an effort to "name and shame" Chinese espionage by publicizing it.[125] Officials are communicating separately with countries where they say there have been at least two dozen such overflights since 2018, including Japan, India, Vietnam, Taiwan and the Philippines in addition to North and South America.[125][106]
The U.S. House Armed Services Committee held a February 7 hearing on wide-ranging Chinese military and intelligence threats including the balloon incursions.[126] Committee chair Republican Mike Rogers characterized the balloon as an intentionally calculated show of force.[127] A U.S. official told The Washington Post there was no sense that the balloon was a deliberate provocation, as it was part of an ongoing global surveillance program.[125] The U.S. House of Representatives voted 419–0 to adopt a resolution condemning China for the incident.[128][129]
Trump called reports of intrusions during his administration "fake disinformation";[130] and his ex-top national security officials said they were unaware of any balloon incursions during their tenure.[131] Biden administration National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan said that improved airspace surveillance ordered by Biden after he took office had detected the previous incursions and "enhanced our capacity to be able to detect things that the Trump administration was unable to detect".[132]
On February 10, the U.S. accused six Chinese companies of supporting the country's military and balloon surveillance program and added them to the U.S. Commerce Department Bureau of Industry and Security's Entity List, which places certain restrictions on exports: Beijing Nanjiang Aerospace Technology Co., Ltd.; China Electronics Technology Group Corporation 48th Research Institute; Dongguan Lingkong Remote Sensing Technology Co., Ltd.; Eagles Men Aviation Science and Technology Group Co., Ltd. (EMAST); Guangzhou Tian-Hai-Xiang Aviation Technology Co., Ltd.; and Shanxi Eagles Men Aviation Science and Technology Group Co., Ltd.[133][134][135] Washington did not specifically link any of them to the balloon that it had shot down.[136]
On February 14, intelligence officials began to explore the possibility that the balloon had not been intended to penetrate U.S. airspace and transit the continental United States but that Chinese authorities had instead sought to engage in more typical surveillance activities near Guam before the balloon potentially became blown off course. These discussions suggested that the international incident caused by the balloon's cross-continental transit may have been partly the result of an accident.[137][138]
On February 16, President Biden gave his first formal remarks on the incident saying, "We're not looking for a new Cold War, but I make no apologies, we will compete and we will responsibly manage that competition so that it doesn't veer into conflict." He further directed his team to develop "sharper rules on how to address these unidentified objects in the future so that the government can distinguish between those that are likely to pose safety and security risks that necessitate action and those that do not."[139]
Kanada
Canadian officials and Global Affairs Canada summoned the Chinese Ambassador to Canada, Cong Peiwu, to Ottawa while the Department of National Defence announced it was monitoring the situation alongside the United States through NORAD.[17][140] A statement from the Canadian Armed Forces said there was no threat to Canadians, and Minister of Foreign Affairs Mélanie Joly would remain in contact with Blinken.[141]
China
On February 3, spokesperson of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs Mao Ning said: "It is a civilian airship used for research, mainly meteorological, purposes. Affected by the Westerlies and with limited self-steering capability, the airship deviated far from its planned course."[16] She said China regretted the unintentional incident, citing force majeure.[142] On February 6, Mao said that the U.S. "hyped up the incident on purpose and even used force to attack", and called the shoot down "an unacceptable and irresponsible action".[143]
According to the BBC, Chinese state media initially ignored the incident but became more defensive after the "near-apologetic tone" of its Ministry of Foreign Affairs.[144] On February 3, China Daily called the spying allegation a lie, saying: "To spy on the U.S. with a balloon, one must both fall far behind to use a 1940s technology and be advanced enough to control its flight across the ocean."[77] Chinese netizens speculated about the maker of the balloon and unconfirmed reports of an unidentified object off the coast of Shandong.[145][144] The incident coincided with the release of science fiction movie The Wandering Earth 2 in mainland China, causing some internet users and media to coin the name "The Wandering Balloon".[146]
After the downing on February 5, Vice Foreign Minister Xie Feng said he had filed a formal complaint with the U.S. Embassy in response to the incident. Xie accused the United States of indiscriminately using force against the civilian airship that was about to leave U.S. airspace in violation of "the spirit of international law and international practice" and said that the Chinese government reserved the right to "take further necessary responses".[79][143] On February 6, a Chinese diplomat said in an interview with French news network LCI that the United States should return the recovered balloon debris to China.[147]
On February 13, Chinese Foreign Affairs spokesperson Wang Wenbin said that U.S. high-altitude balloons had "illegally crossed China's airspace" more than ten times since 2022. According to CNN, he did not offer evidence. Wang also complained about U.S. reconnaissance against China and wiretapping efforts around the world.[148] U.S. National Security spokesperson John Kirby said "there is no U.S. surveillance craft in China's airspace" but declined to specify whether his denial covered disputed airspace claimed by China.[149] On February 14, Wang elaborated by saying that since 2022, circumnavigation balloons launched from U.S. soil flew over China and other countries illegally more than ten times.[150]
NATO
NATO secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg said the balloon "confirms a pattern of Chinese behavior where we see that China has invested heavily in new capabilities, including different types of surveillance and intelligence platforms", and that it presents security challenges for the members of the alliance.[151]
Australien
Amidst the ongoing Australia–China trade war, Australian Minister for Foreign Affairs Penny Wong said: "I believe the US has managed this as carefully as possible. They brought the balloon down over their own territorial waters."[152][153][154]
Japan
Japan said that it strongly suspected Chinese surveillance balloons had entered its territory on at least three occasions and told China that violations of its airspace by uncrewed surveillance balloons were absolutely unacceptable.[155][156]
Singapur
The Singaporean Minister for Foreign Affairs, Vivian Balakrishnan, said that it was a "pity" that Blinken's visit to China was postponed. He added regarding the balloon that "hopefully both sides exercise sufficient self-restraint and reduce the prospects of such incidents".[157]
Vereinigtes Königreich
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak stated on February 13 that the United Kingdom's government would do "whatever it takes" to defend the country from observation balloons. He added that the Royal Air Force had alerted Typhoon jets to stand-by.[158] Furthermore, ex-MI6 chief Sir Alex Younger, said that due to the systematic nature of China's surveillance program, the UK must "wake up" to China's threat to global security.[159]
Venezuela
Venezuela's foreign ministry condemned the United States for shooting down what they stated was an unmanned civilian aircraft which posed no threat.[160][161]
Media reactions
Analysis
Michael Clarke, a British defense analyst, said China wanted the balloon "to be noticed described" and described the incident as a "stunt gone wrong".[162] Saying that the Chinese were "completely in the wrong", he surmised that the fly-over was China's way of retaliating for an agreement that was signed by the United States and the Philippines on February 2, which would grant four more US military bases in the Philippines in response to China's nine dash line claims.[162][163]
Bonnie Glaser, a China expert at the German Marshall Fund of the United States, said that "we collect intelligence on China from bases all around their east coast, in Japan, Guam and Australia. We fly P-8 [spy plane] flights on a daily basis and the Chinese can't do that." Surveillance ballons might have been a creative way to collect information and to offer China some insights into US capabilities and possibly vulnerabilities.[164]
John Blaxland, a professor of international security and intelligence studies at the Australian National University, suggested that the Chinese likely expected the balloon to be detected and being detected was the goal. He believes that the balloon was launched to embarrass the US, with intelligence gathering being a secondary objective.[165] Baxland also said that the balloon could be designed to test the resolve of Washington as well as gather information about American detection capabilities and reaction.[166]
On the shooting of the balloon, Christopher Twomey, a security scholar, said that any Chinese response would be restrained and that China would want to "sweep this under the rug" and emphasize senior-level visits within months.[167]
Gregory Falco, an aerospace security expert at the Johns Hopkins University, said that the balloon was part of "China's hybrid communications architecture" of relaying surveillance data to satellites in Low Earth Orbit and back to Chinese ground stations.[168] He also said that the large solar panels, antenna and the navigation capabilities onboard indicated it was engaged for surveillance and not weather data collection.[169][170]
Satire
The incident was satirized for the show Saturday Night Live the evening after it was shot down.[171] In the sketch, performer Bowen Yang portrayed an anthropomorphized depiction of the downed balloon being interviewed by MSNBC journalist Katy Tur (played by Chloe Fineman).[172] Some sources paid particular attention to Yang's line, "Congrats! You shot a balloon!", with USA Today using it in the headline of its coverage.[173]
Other high-altitude objects
Another balloon was detected flying over Latin America.[174] The Costa Rican General Directorate of Civil Aviation confirmed the incursion by an object "not of Costa Rican origin", which the locals had first seen on February 2.[175] The Colombian Air Force said that on the morning of February 3, it had detected an object with "characteristics similar to those of a balloon" at a height of 55,000 feet (17,000 m) and traveling at a speed of 25 knots (46 kilometres per hour; 29 miles per hour), and after determining it was not a threat to national security and defense or to air safety, had continued to track it until it left Colombian airspace.[161][176] Sightings of the balloon were also reported from Venezuela,[177] specifically from Maracaibo.[178] The U.S. Department of Defense confirmed those sightings and called the object another Chinese surveillance balloon.[179] On February 6, Mao Ning, the spokeswoman for the Chinese government, confirmed the balloon belongs to China, but said that it was used for "flight tests" and was blown off-course in much the same manner as the one spotted over North America.[180][181]
On February 10, another high-altitude object was shot down on the vicinity of Deadhorse, Alaska, over the Beaufort Sea;[182] recovery efforts by the Alaska National Guard on the sea ice are on-going.
On February 11, on previous orders of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, a "small, cylindrical object" was shot down over the Yukon Territory for violating Canadian air space; both U.S. and Canadian aircraft had scrambled, and a U.S. F-22 jet fighter made the kill.[183]
On February 12, the US military shot down a fourth unidentified object over Lake Huron, within the maritime territory of Michigan.[184][185]
On February 14, the US government announced that the latter three high-altitude objects shot down over the North America were likely private entities with no relations to China. Further analysis and debris collections were underway.[20] The four AIM-9X missiles expended for shooting down the three objects cost at least $1.5 million.[186]
On February 17, the US and Canada suspended their search for the debris from the downed objects and the missile that missed.[187][188][189]
See also
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/4a/Commons-logo.svg/30px-Commons-logo.svg.png)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/24/Wikinews-logo.svg/40px-Wikinews-logo.svg.png)
Notes
- ^ Guam and Hawaii are home to key U.S. military installations[12]
- ^ The New York Times article cites the Office of Personnel Management data breach, the Anthem medical data breach, and a Marriott International data breach as examples.
- ^ Sources citing the defense official who gave the estimate did not identify what size of a bus was referenced. Lengths of U.S. school buses vary but are limited to 45 feet (14 m) per specifications defined by the National Congress on School Transportation.[54]
This article incorporates public domain material from Bart Elias. Monitoring the Sovereign Skies. Congressional Research Service. Retrieved March 2, 2022.
References
- ^ a b c d Sevastopulo, Demetri (February 7, 2023). "US says it does not plan to return spy balloon debris to China". Financial Times. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ "Chinese spy balloon over US is weather device says Beijing". BBC News. February 3, 2023. Archived from the original on February 6, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ Brown, Matthew; Pollard, James (February 5, 2023). "Eyes on the sky as Chinese balloon shot down over Atlantic". Associated Press. Archived from the original on February 5, 2023. Retrieved February 5, 2023.
- ^ a b Baldor, Lolita C.; Copp, Tara (February 4, 2023). "China balloon: Many questions about suspected spy in the sky". Associated Press. Archived from the original on February 9, 2023. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
- ^ a b Hill, Randall; Stewart, Phil; Mason, Jeff (February 4, 2023). "U.S. fighter jet shoots down suspected Chinese spy balloon". Reuters. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 5, 2023.
- ^ a b Lee, Matthew (February 4, 2023). "Chinese balloon soars across US; Blinken scraps Beijing trip". Associated Press. Archived from the original on February 5, 2023. Retrieved February 5, 2023.
- ^ a b c d Wong, Edward; Barnes, Julian E. (February 9, 2023). "Chinese Balloon Had Tools to Collect Electronic Communications, U.S. Says". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 9, 2023. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
- ^ a b Hudson, John; Nakashima, Ellen; Lamothe, Dan (February 9, 2023). "U.S. declassifies balloon intelligence, calls out China for spying". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on February 10, 2023. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
- ^ a b Bushwick, Sophie (February 3, 2023). "Chinese Spy Balloon Has Unexpected Maneuverability". Scientific American. Archived from the original on February 6, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
This maneuverability is beyond the capabilities of most high-altitude balloons, says John Villasenor, director of the Institute for Technology, Law and Policy and a professor of electrical engineering, law, public policy and management at the University of California, Los Angeles.
- ^ a b c Kohli, Anisha (February 4, 2023). "The Chinese Balloon Looks Nothing Like a Weather Balloon". Time. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ a b "China balloon: Could it have been blown off course as Beijing claims?". BBC News. February 3, 2023. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ Wong, Edward; Barnes, Julian E.; Entous, Adam (February 15, 2023). "How a Fog of Questions Over a Spy Balloon and U.F.O.s Fed a Diplomatic Crisis". The New York Times. New York Times.
- ^ "Downed Chinese balloon aimed for Hawaii but was blown off course - U.S. official". Reuters. February 16, 2023. Retrieved February 23, 2023.
- ^ Pamuk, Humeyra; Ali, Idrees; Martina, Michael; Ali, Idrees (February 4, 2023). "Blinken postpones China trip over 'unacceptable' Chinese spy balloon". Reuters.
- ^ a b Cadell, Cate; Hudson, John; Abutaleb, Yasmeen. "Blinken postpones China trip as suspected spy balloon detected over U.S.". The Washington Post. Retrieved February 5, 2023.
- ^ a b c Hansler, Jennifer; Liptak, Kevin; Herb, Jeremy; Atwood, Kylie; Sciutto, Kylie; Liebermann, Oren (February 3, 2023). "Blinken postpones trip to Beijing after Chinese spy balloon spotted over US, officials say". CNN. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 5, 2023.
- ^ a b "Ottawa tight-lipped on details as Canada, U.S. call out China over balloon". CTV News. February 3, 2023. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
- ^ Cooper, Helene; Barnes, Julian E.; Wong, Edward (February 10, 2023). "U.S. Shoots Down High-Altitude Object Over Alaska". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on February 10, 2023. Retrieved February 11, 2023.
- ^ Newton, Paula (February 11, 2023). "NORAD says additional 'object' detected over northern Canada". CNN. Archived from the original on February 11, 2023. Retrieved February 11, 2023.
- ^ a b Fabian, Jordan; McBride, Courtney; Litvan, Laura (February 14, 2024). "US Says 3 Mystery Objects Likely Private, With No China Link". Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on February 14, 2023. Retrieved February 15, 2023.
- ^ Stewart, Phil; Shalal, Andrea; Stewart, Phil (February 13, 2023). "U.S. military brings down flying object over Lake Huron". Reuters. Archived from the original on February 13, 2023. Retrieved February 13, 2023.
- ^ a b De Guzman, Chad (February 3, 2023). "Why Is China Allegedly Using a Spy Balloon When It Has a Global Satellite Network?". Time. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 4, 2023.
- ^ Schwarz, Jon (February 7, 2023). "U.S. Sent "Weather" Balloons to Spy on China and the Soviet Union in the 1950s". The Intercept.
Asked if the United States feels that they have the right to send these balloons at a certain height anywhere around the globe, Dulles answered, Yes, I think that we feel that way.
- ^ Ng, Kelly (February 3, 2023). "Why would China use a spy balloon when it has satellites?". BBC News. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 4, 2023.
- ^ Hitchens, Theresa (July 28, 2022). "Way up in the air: World View looks to expand customer base for its 'Stratollite' balloon". Breaking Defense. Archived from the original on February 16, 2023. Retrieved February 18, 2023.
- ^ Hudson, Lee (February 3, 2023). "It's 2023. Why are militaries still using spy balloons?". Politico. Retrieved February 23, 2023.
- ^ Hudson, Lee (July 5, 2022). "U.S. military's newest weapon against China and Russia: Hot air". Politico. Retrieved February 24, 2023.
- ^ Barnes, Julian E.; Wong, Edward; Cooper, Helene; Buckley, Chris (February 8, 2023). "China Sends Spy Balloons Over Military Sites Worldwide, U.S. Officials Say". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved February 23, 2023.
- ^ Baptista, Eduardo; Torode, Greg (February 6, 2023). "China's military has shown growing interest in high-altitude balloons". Reuters. Archived from the original on February 6, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ "China's military keeps rivals on edge with balloon strategy". Financial Times. February 6, 2023. Retrieved February 23, 2023.
- ^ Rogoway, Tyler (September 22, 2018). "Video Appears To Show China Testing Hypersonic Glide Vehicles Via High Altitude Balloon". The War Zone.
- ^ Wilkie, Christina (February 6, 2023). "Chinese spy balloon fallout roils Washington and Beijing". CNBC. Archived from the original on February 6, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ Stewart, Phil; Ali, Idrees; Stewart, Phil; Ali, Idrees (February 6, 2023). "U.S. failed to detect past Chinese spy balloons, Air Force general says". Reuters. Archived from the original on February 6, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ "Biden says U.S. will "take care of" suspected Chinese spy balloon". CBS News. Archived from the original on February 5, 2023. Retrieved February 5, 2023.
- ^ Raddatz, Martha; Martinez, Luis; Yiu, Karson. "Large Chinese reconnaissance balloon spotted over the US, officials say". ABC News. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
- ^ a b c Miller, Zeke; Balsamo, Michael; Long, Colleen; Madhani, Aamer; Baldor, Lolita C. (February 5, 2023). "US downs Chinese balloon, drawing a threat from China". AP News. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 5, 2023.
- ^ a b c Baldor, Lolita C.; Copp, Tara (February 4, 2023). "China balloon: Many questions about suspected spy in the sky". Associated Press. Archived from the original on February 9, 2023. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
- ^ Neukam, Stephen (February 5, 2023). "Chinese balloons flew over US three times during Trump administration: officials". The Hill. Archived from the original on February 5, 2023. Retrieved February 5, 2023.
- ^ Barnes, Julian E.; Cooper, Helene; Wong, Edward (February 7, 2023). "Previous Chinese Balloon Incursions Initially Went Undetected". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on February 9, 2023. Retrieved February 10, 2023.
- ^ Ashley Roque, Other Chinese balloons slipped through 'domain awareness gap' in US defenses: General Archived February 9, 2023, at the Wayback Machine, Breaking Defense (February 6, 2023).
- ^ Trevithick, Joseph; Rogoway, Tyler (February 6, 2023). "U-2 Spy Planes Snooped On Chinese Surveillance Balloon". The Drive. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ "Gen. Glen VanHerck, Commander, North American Aerospace Defense Command and United States Northern Command, Holds an Off-Camera, On-The-Record Briefing on the High-Altitude Surveillance Balloon Recovery Efforts". U.S. Department of Defense. February 6, 2023. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ Wong, Edward; Barnes, Julian E. (February 9, 2023). "Chinese Balloon Had Tools to Collect Electronic Communications, U.S. Says". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 9, 2023. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
- ^ Hudson, John; Nakashima, Ellen; Lamothe, Dan (February 9, 2023). "U.S. declassifies balloon intelligence, calls out China for spying". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on February 10, 2023. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
- ^ Bredemeier, Ken; Farivar, Masood (February 9, 2023). "US: Chinese Military Likely at Center of Balloon-Spying Operation". Voice of America. Archived from the original on February 9, 2023. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
- ^ "What could Japan do about foreign spy balloons over its territory?". The Japan Times. Archived from the original on February 18, 2023. Retrieved February 18, 2023.
- ^ "Japan to pave way for military to shoot down intruding balloons". The Straits Times. Archived from the original on February 18, 2023. Retrieved February 18, 2023.
- ^ Kumar, Ankit; Bhalla, Abhishek (February 6, 2023). "Mystery balloon hovered over Andaman & Nicobar Islands around tri-service military drill". India Today.
- ^ "Uncontacted tribes and an Indian military base. Did a 'spy' balloon snoop on the Andaman and Nicobar islands?". CNN. February 18, 2023. Retrieved February 23, 2023.
- ^ "Chinese weather balloons no reason for alarm: MND". Taipei Times. CNA. February 28, 2022. Archived from the original on March 25, 2022. Retrieved January 5, 2023.
- ^ "Taiwan says crashed balloon was used for weather monitoring". South China Morning Post. February 18, 2023.
- ^ a b c Wong, Edward; Barnes, Julian E. (February 9, 2023). "Chinese Balloon Had Tools to Collect Electronic Communications, U.S. Says". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 9, 2023. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
- ^ Sanger, David E. (February 5, 2023). "Balloon Incident Reveals More Than Spying as Competition With China Intensifies". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on February 10, 2023. Retrieved February 10, 2023.
- ^ "National School Transportation Specifications & Procedures" (PDF). May 20, 2010. p. 47. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 25, 2022. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ "The suspected Chinese spy balloon was as tall as a 20-story building and weighed thousands of pounds". Deseret News. February 8, 2023. Archived from the original on February 10, 2023. Retrieved February 10, 2023.
- ^ Erwin, Sandra (February 17, 2023). "AI startup using satellite imagery to trace the path of Chinese balloon". SpaceNews. Retrieved February 24, 2023.
- ^ a b c "Gen. Glen VanHerck, Commander, North American Aerospace Defense Command and United States Northern Command, Holds an Off-Camera, On-The-Record Briefing on the High-Altitude Surveillance Balloon Recovery Efforts". U.S. Department of Defense. February 6, 2023. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ Spoehel, Jay (February 3, 2023). "China spy flight: What to know". Fox Business. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ "US: Chinese Balloon Is part of Large Spying Program". Voice of America. February 9, 2023. Archived from the original on February 9, 2023. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
- ^ "Foreign Ministry Spokesperson's Remarks on US Announcement of the Postponement of Secretary of State Blinken's Visit to China". Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China. February 4, 2023. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ a b c d Mansoor, Sanya (February 3, 2023). "The Alleged Chinese Spy Balloon Is Now Over Missouri. Here's What We Know About Its Path". Time. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ a b Helfrich, Emma; Trevithick, Joseph; Rogowa, Tyler (February 4, 2023). "Why Shooting Down China's Spy Balloon Over The U.S. Is More Complicated Than It Seems". The Drive. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ a b c d "Senior Defense Official and Senior Military Official Hold an Off-Camera, On-Background Press Briefing Update on the High-Altitude Surveillance Balloon". U.S. Department of Defense. February 4, 2023. Archived from the original on February 5, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ Lee, Matthew; Tucker, Eric (February 9, 2023). "US says Chinese military behind vast aerial spy program". Associated Press. Archived from the original on February 9, 2023. Retrieved February 10, 2023.
- ^ Salama, Vivian; Gordon, Michael R. (February 9, 2023). "Chinese Balloon Carried Antennas, Other Equipment to Gather Intelligence, U.S. Says". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on February 9, 2023. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
- ^ Williams, Abigail (February 9, 2023). "Chinese spy balloon carried 'multiple antennas' for collecting signals intelligence, State Dept. says". NBC News. Archived from the original on February 9, 2023. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
- ^ Doak, Chase. I thought it was a UFO. Turns out, it was a Chinese spy balloon. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023 – via YouTube.
- ^ Szpaller, Keila (February 6, 2023). "Billings photojournalists recall seeing balloon before it was identified, shot down". Daily Montanan. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ a b Nur-Azna, Sanusi (February 3, 2023). "Spy balloon witness thought it might have been a star or UFO". Reuters. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ Tomme, Lt. Col. Edward B. (2005). "The Paradigm Shift to Effects-Based Space: Near-Space as a Combat Space Effects Enabler" (PDF). College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research and Education, Air University. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ Phillips, Aleks (February 3, 2023). "Shooting down Chinese spy balloon a lot harder than it seems". Newsweek. Archived from the original on February 10, 2023. Retrieved February 10, 2023.
- ^ "Chinese Spy Balloon Tracked Over U.S. This Week". The Wall Street Journal. February 2, 2023. Archived from the original on February 10, 2023. Retrieved February 10, 2023.
- ^ a b "Gazette's spy balloon photos play role in White House's response to China". Billings Gazette. February 4, 2023. Archived from the original on February 6, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ a b Szpaller, Keila (February 6, 2023). "Billings photojournalists recall seeing balloon before it was identified, shot down". Daily Montanan. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ a b c Kube, Courtney; Lee, Carol E. (February 3, 2023). "Suspected Chinese spy balloon found over northern U.S." NBC News. Archived from the original on February 2, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
- ^ a b c Cooper, Helene (February 3, 2023). "Pentagon Says It Detected a Chinese Spy Balloon Hovering Over Montana". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 4, 2023.
- ^ a b c Borger, Julian (February 3, 2023). "Pentagon says it is monitoring Chinese spy balloon spotted flying over US". The Guardian. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
- ^ a b * Palumbo, Daniele; Howells, Jeremy; Rivault, Erwan (February 3, 2023). "China balloon: Could it have been blown off course as Beijing claims?". BBC News. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 4, 2023.
* Petras, George (February 3, 2023). "US tracked suspected Chinese spy balloon for 5 days before shooting it down over the Atlantic". USA Today. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023. - ^ a b c d e Miller, Zeke; Balsamo, Michael; Long, Colleen; Madhani, Aamer; Baldor, Lolita C. (February 5, 2023). "US downs Chinese balloon, drawing a threat from China". AP News. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 5, 2023.
- ^ a b "Suspected Chinese spy balloon sightings reported across U.S. as Pentagon tracks it". The Washington Post. February 3, 2023. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ Norris, Robert S.; Kristensen, Hans M. (November 27, 2015). "U.S. Nuclear Forces, 2009". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 65 (2). Taylor & Francis: 59–69. doi:10.2968/065002008. eISSN 1938-3282. ISSN 0096-3402. LCCN 48034039. OCLC 470268256.
- ^ Cox, John (May 30, 2017). "Ask the Captain: Highest altitudes for planes". USA Today. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ "Why stratospheric balloons are used in era of space-based intelligence". Defense News. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ Lawder, David (February 5, 2023). "Republicans criticize Biden for waiting to shoot down Chinese balloon". Reuters. Archived from the original on February 5, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ a b c Trevithick, Joseph; Rogoway, Tyler (February 6, 2023). "U-2 Spy Planes Snooped On Chinese Surveillance Balloon". The Drive. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ Gordon, Chris (February 3, 2023). "F-22s Scramble from Nellis in Response to Chinese Spy Balloon Over US". Air & Space Forces Magazine.
- ^ Cameron, Doug (February 9, 2023). "U-2, Cold War Flashpoint, Comes Out of the Shadows for Chinese Balloon". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved February 23, 2023.
- ^ Cooper, Helene; Wong, Edward (February 4, 2023). "U.S. Shoots Down Chinese Spy Balloon Off the Coast of the Carolinas". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 4, 2023.
- ^ Danner, Chas (February 5, 2023). "Did China's Alleged Spy Balloon Mission Backfire? Updates". Intelligencer. Archived from the original on February 5, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ Bertrand, Natasha (February 10, 2023). "Exclusive: US developed method to track China's spy balloon fleet within last year, sources say". CNN. Retrieved February 21, 2023.
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Moore, Stephanie. "Pictures: 'Chinese Spy Balloon' spotted over South Carolina, North Carolina". WYFF. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 4, 2023.
{{cite news}}
:|archive-date=
/|archive-url=
timestamp mismatch; February 5, 2023 suggested (help) - ^ Liptak, Kevin; Mattingly, Phil; Bertrand, Natasha; Muntean, Pete; Liebermann, Oren (February 5, 2023). "Inside Biden's decision to 'take care of' the Chinese spy balloon that triggered a diplomatic crisis". CNN. Archived from the original on February 6, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ Stanton, Andrew (February 4, 2023). "Chinese Spy Balloon Shot Down Over Atlantic". Newsweek. Archived from the original on February 5, 2023. Retrieved February 4, 2023.
- ^ Accettulla, Kevin. "Ground stop issued at Myrtle Beach International Airport due to suspected Chinese spy balloon". WBTW. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 4, 2023.
- ^ "Ground stop issued along Carolina coast after unconfirmed sightings of Chinese spy balloon". WCNC-TV. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 4, 2023.
- ^ Morris, Kyle. "Where is the Chinese spy balloon now? Airship spotted flying over North Carolina". Fox News. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 4, 2023.
- ^ Garamone, Jim (February 4, 2023). "F-22 Safely Shoots Down Chinese Spy Balloon Off South Carolina Coast". United States Department of Defense. Archived from the original on February 11, 2023. Retrieved February 12, 2023.
A U.S. Air Force fighter safely shot down a Chinese high-altitude surveillance balloon today, Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III said in a written statement.
- ^ Altman, Howard; Payne, Stetson; Rogoway, Tyler (February 4, 2023). "F-22 Shoots Down Chinese Spy Balloon Off Carolinas With Missile (Updated)". The Drive. Archived from the original on February 5, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ Mitchell, Ellen (February 6, 2023). "Rough seas complicate US efforts to recover suspected China spy balloon". The Hill. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ Miller, Andrew (February 4, 2023). "Pentagon reveals details on how Chinese spy balloon was taken down with single shot". Fox News. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 5, 2023.
- ^ "US Navy working to recover debris from Chinese 'spy balloon'". Al Jazeera. February 6, 2023. Archived from the original on February 6, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ LaGrone, Sam (February 4, 2023). "3 Navy Warships, FBI Now Hunting for Wreckage of Chinese Spy Balloon off South Carolina". USNI News. United States Naval Institute. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 5, 2023.
- ^ "Suspected Chinese spy balloon shot down off South Carolina coast". CBS News. February 5, 2023. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 8, 2023.
- ^ Vergun, David (February 6, 2023). "U.S. Navy Collecting Surveillance Balloon Debris". U.S. Department of Defense. Archived from the original on February 8, 2023. Retrieved February 8, 2023.
- ^ "Chinese High-Altitude Balloon Recovery". Federal Bureau of Investigation. February 9, 2023. Archived from the original on February 10, 2023. Retrieved February 10, 2023.
- ^ a b Lillis, Katie Bo; Herb, Jeremy; Campbell, Josh; Cohen, Zachary; Atwood, Kylie; Bertrand, Natasha (February 8, 2023). "Spy balloon part of a broader Chinese military surveillance operation, US intel sources say". CNN. Archived from the original on February 8, 2023. Retrieved February 8, 2023.
- ^ Norman, Greg (February 6, 2023). "Here is where US is taking remains of China spy flight". Fox News. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ Musumeci, Natalie (February 8, 2023). "China says it wants its busted balloon back after the US Navy fished the suspected spy craft out of the ocean". Business Insider. Archived from the original on February 8, 2023. Retrieved February 8, 2023.
- ^ "China Says US Should Return Debris From Balloon It Shot Down". Bloomberg News. February 8, 2023. Archived from the original on February 8, 2023. Retrieved February 8, 2023.
- ^ a b "Significant portion of Chinese balloon spy equipment recovered, US official says". ABC News. February 13, 2023. Archived from the original on February 13, 2023. Retrieved February 13, 2023.
- ^ a b "Chinese balloon sensors recovered from ocean, says US". BBC News. February 14, 2023. Archived from the original on February 14, 2023. Retrieved February 15, 2023.
- ^ "Chinese spy balloon recovery operation has concluded". CNN. February 17, 2023. Archived from the original on February 17, 2023. Retrieved February 17, 2023.
- ^ Elias, Bart (February 27, 2023). "Monitoring the Sovereign Skies". Insight. Congressional Research Service. Retrieved March 2, 2023.
- ^ Hitchens, Theresa (February 7, 2023). "Balloons vs. satellites: Popping some misconceptions about capability and legality". Breaking Defense.
- ^ Rothwell, Donald. "Did China's balloon violate international law?". The Conversation (website).
- ^ "It's a Bird! It's a Plane! No, It's a Spy Balloon! The International Law Implications of China's Actions and the United States' Response". Minnesota Journal of International Law. February 17, 2023.
- ^ Dunlap Jr., Charlie J. (February 5, 2023). "Guest Post: "The Chinese balloon shoot-down incident and the law: some observations"". Lawfire.
- ^ Buckley, Chris (February 5, 2023). "China Finds Itself With Limited Options After U.S. Shoots Down Balloon". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved February 23, 2023.
- ^ Hutzler, Alexandra; Cathey, Libby; Deliso, Meredith; Guerilus, Stephanie (February 4, 2023). "Chinese balloon live updates: 'We're going to take care of it,' Biden says". ABC News. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 4, 2023.
- ^ Griffiths, Brent D. "Trump and other Republicans call for the US 'to shoot down' a suspected Chinese spy balloon". Business Insider. Archived from the original on February 5, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ Lawder, David; Sullivan, Andy (February 5, 2023). "U.S. military says it is searching for remnants of Chinese spy balloon". Washington: Reuters. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ "Satellite Images Reveal Chinese Balloon Bases". Rolling Stone. February 14, 2023. Archived from the original on February 16, 2023. Retrieved February 19, 2023.
- ^ "No cameras allowed near balloon launching pad in China's Hainan island". NBC News. February 18, 2023. Archived from the original on February 18, 2023. Retrieved February 19, 2023.
- ^ "Chinese balloon part of worldwide fleet, US officials say". BBC News. February 8, 2023. Archived from the original on February 9, 2023. Retrieved February 10, 2023.
- ^ a b c Nakashima, Ellen; Harris, John; Hudson, Shane; Lamothe, Dan (February 7, 2023). "Chinese balloon part of vast aerial surveillance program, U.S. says". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on February 8, 2023. Retrieved February 8, 2023.
- ^ Wendler, Jacob (February 7, 2023). "House panel warns of China's threat to U.S. after surveillance balloon incident". United Press International. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ Rogers, Mike (February 7, 2023). "Rogers Opening Statement at Hearing on Pressing Threat of CCP to U.S. National Defense". Armed Services Republicans. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ Mascaro, Lisa (February 9, 2023). "US House votes to condemn China over balloon surveillance". Associated Press. Archived from the original on February 9, 2023. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
- ^ H.Res. 104 (118th Cong.)
- ^ Barnes, Julian E.; Cooper, Helene; Wong, Edward (February 7, 2023). "Previous Chinese Balloon Incursions Initially Went Undetected". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on February 9, 2023. Retrieved February 10, 2023.
- ^ Singman, Brooke (February 5, 2023). "Trump, top national security officials refute claim that Chinese spy balloons transited US under last admin". Fox News. Archived from the original on February 5, 2023. Retrieved February 5, 2023.
- ^ Miller, Zeke; Baldor, Lolita C.; Madhani, Aamer (February 6, 2023). "White House: Improved surveillance caught Chinese balloon". Associated Press. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ "US blacklists 6 Chinese entities over balloon program". Associated Press. Archived from the original on February 16, 2023. Retrieved February 18, 2023.
- ^ "U.S. adds 6 Chinese entities tied to balloon program to export blacklist". Reuters. February 10, 2023. Archived from the original on February 11, 2023. Retrieved February 11, 2023.
- ^ "Additions to the Entity List". Federal Register. February 14, 2023. Archived from the original on February 15, 2023. Retrieved February 13, 2023.
- ^ Buckley, Chris (February 13, 2023). "China's Top Airship Scientist Promoted Program to Watch the World From Above". The New York Times.
- ^ "U.S. tracked China spy balloon from launch on Hainan Island along unusual path". The Washington Post. February 14, 2023. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on February 16, 2023. Retrieved February 16, 2023.
- ^ "US intel assessing possibility that Chinese spy balloon's path over US was accidental". CNN. February 15, 2023. Archived from the original on February 16, 2023. Retrieved February 16, 2023.
- ^ Alexander, Peter (February 16, 2023). "Biden's speech on the Spy Balloon". NBC News. Archived from the original on February 18, 2023. Retrieved February 16, 2023.
- ^ D'Andrea, Aaron; Boynton, Sean (February 3, 2023). "Suspected Chinese surveillance balloon spent time in Canadian airspace: Sources". Global News. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
- ^ "Canadian pilots were warned of 'untethered balloon' amid China surveillance concerns". Global News. February 3, 2023. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
- ^ Rychcik, Savannah (February 3, 2023). "China Issues Statement Following Reports of a Suspected Spy Balloon Over Montana". Independent Journal Review. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 5, 2023.
- ^ a b Wang Fujiyama, Emily (February 6, 2023). "China accuses US of indiscriminate use of force over balloon". AP News. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ a b "How has China reacted to the balloon saga?". BBC News. February 14, 2023. Retrieved March 1, 2023.
- ^ Shoaib, Alia (February 12, 2023). "Chinese authorities said they were preparing to shoot down an 'unidentified flying object' spotted near the Yellow Sea". Business Insider. Archived from the original on February 12, 2023. Retrieved February 12, 2023.
- ^ Wu, Huizhong (February 4, 2023). "China tries to minimize impact of suspected spy balloon after Blinken cancels visit". PBS NewsHour. Archived from the original on February 9, 2023. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
- ^ "China Says US Should Return Debris From Balloon It Shot Down". Bloomberg News. February 8, 2023. Archived from the original on February 8, 2023. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
- ^ Gan, Nectar; Chang, Wayne (February 13, 2023). "China accuses US of 'illegally' flying balloons across its airspace". CNN. Archived from the original on February 14, 2023. Retrieved February 13, 2023.
- ^ "No U.S. surveillance craft in China's airspace, White House says". Reuters. February 13, 2023. Retrieved February 23, 2023.
- ^ "2023年2月14日外交部发言人汪文斌主持例行记者会". Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China (in Chinese). February 14, 2023.
- ^ Macias, Amanda (February 8, 2023). "Spy balloon confirms 'pattern of Chinese behavior' that poses threat to NATO members, Stoltenberg says". CNBC. Archived from the original on February 11, 2023. Retrieved February 12, 2023.
- ^ Wood, Richard (February 6, 2023). "Penny Wong backs US over shooting down of Chinese 'spy balloon'". 9news.com.au. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ Ransley, Ellen (February 6, 2023). "Penny Wong urges calm after US shoots down China 'weather' balloon". news.com.au. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ "Foreign Minister Penny Wong responds to the balloon incident". Australian Broadcasting Corporation. February 5, 2023. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ "Japan Defence Ministry 'strongly suspects' Chinese surveillance balloons have entered Japanese territory". Reuters. February 14, 2023. Retrieved February 23, 2023.
- ^ "Japan told China violation of airspace by balloons is unacceptable, spokesman says". Reuters. February 15, 2023. Retrieved February 23, 2023.
- ^ "Transcript of Minister for Foreign Affairs Dr Vivian Balakrishnan's Post-ASEAN Foreign Ministers' Retreat Doorstop Interview in Indonesia with Singapore Media, 4 February 2023". Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Singapore).
- ^ "UK ready to defend against spy balloons – Rishi Sunak". BBC News. February 13, 2023. Archived from the original on February 13, 2023. Retrieved February 13, 2023.
- ^ "UK must wake up to China threat, says ex-MI6 chief Sir Alex Younger". BBC News. February 14, 2023. Archived from the original on February 14, 2023. Retrieved February 14, 2023.
- ^ Lauren, Giella (February 6, 2023). "Putin Ally Backs China, Says U.S. Was Wrong to Shoot Down Spy Balloon". Newsweek. Archived from the original on February 9, 2023. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
- ^ a b "Venezuela Condemns Washington for Shooting Down Chinese Balloon". Bloomberg News. February 5, 2023. Archived from the original on February 6, 2023. Retrieved February 5, 2023.
- ^ a b Baynes, Megan (February 5, 2023). "How did the US successfully shoot down China's 'spy balloon' with a single missile - and what was on it?". Sky News.
- ^ "Spy balloon: China wanted surveillance balloon 'to be noticed' says defence analyst Michael Clarke". Sky News. February 3, 2023.
- ^ Taylor, Luke; Yu, Verna; Lowell, Hugo; Borger, Julian (February 10, 2023). "China 'spy balloon' wakes up world to new era of war at edge of space". The Guardian.
- ^ Sullivan, Helen (February 3, 2023). "Spy balloons: what are they and why are they still being used?". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 14, 2023.
- ^ McGregor, Maeve (February 7, 2023). "Why would China use obsolete espionage when it operates advanced satellites?". Crikey. Archived from the original on February 8, 2023. Retrieved February 14, 2023.
- ^ Woo, Ryan; Torode, Greg (February 5, 2023). "China has reasons to keep cool after U.S. downs balloon". Reuters. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ "Spy balloons 'part of China's hybrid communication architecture', says aerospace security expert". Channel 4. February 13, 2023. Archived from the original on February 16, 2023. Retrieved February 16, 2023.
- ^ "Chinese balloon capable of gathering intelligence - US official". BBC News. February 9, 2023. Archived from the original on February 16, 2023. Retrieved February 16, 2023.
- ^ "High-Flying Balloon Seen as Part of Broader Chinese Spy Program". Bloomberg News. February 3, 2023. Archived from the original on February 5, 2023. Retrieved February 16, 2023.
- ^ Spy Balloon Cold Open - SNL. Saturday Night Live. February 4, 2023. Archived from the original on February 18, 2023. Retrieved February 19, 2023 – via YouTube.
- ^ Stern, Marlow (February 5, 2023). "SNL Airs Hilarious Interview With Bowen Yang's Chinese Spy Balloon". Rolling Stone. Archived from the original on February 5, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ Alexander, Bryan. "'SNL': MSNBC lands exclusive interview with Chinese spy balloon: 'Congrats! You shot a balloon'". USA Today. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ "Second Chinese balloon confirmed over Latin America". Deutsche Welle. February 6, 2023.
- ^ "Speculation About Balloon Seen Over Costa Rica Continues". The Tico Times. February 5, 2023. Archived from the original on February 6, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ "Fuerza Aérea detectó un objeto similar a un globo sobre cielo colombiano" [Air Force detected a balloon-like object over Colombian sky]. El Universal (in Spanish). February 4, 2023. Archived from the original on February 5, 2023. Retrieved February 5, 2023.
- ^ Hutzler, Alexandra; Cathey, Libby; Deliso, Meredith; Guerilus, Stephanie. "Chinese balloon live updates: Second balloon flying over South America: Pentagon". ABC News. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 4, 2023.
- ^ "Un globo espía chino también flotó sobre Maracaibo pero Maduro ignoró su visita" [Chinese spy balloon also hovered over Maracaibo but Maduro ignored its visit]. La Patilla (in Spanish). February 9, 2023. Archived from the original on February 12, 2023. Retrieved February 12, 2023.
- ^ Gregorian, Dareh; Kube, Courtney; Gains, Mosheh; Richards, Zoë. "Another Chinese 'surveillance balloon' is flying over Latin America, Pentagon says". NBC News. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 4, 2023.
- ^ Wang, Selina; Change, Wayne (February 6, 2023). "Balloon over Latin America belongs to China, Beijing says". CNN. Archived from the original on February 6, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ "Second balloon over Latin America is ours – China". BBC News. February 6, 2023. Archived from the original on February 6, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ Downing, Suzanne (February 10, 2023). "Breaking: Air Force shoots down item over Prudhoe; temporary flight restriction over Deadhorse, as Air Force C-130 circles Prudhoe Bay". Must Read Alaska. Archived from the original on February 12, 2023. Retrieved February 12, 2023.
- ^ Mackintosh, Thomas; Armstrong, Kathryn (February 12, 2023). "Chuck Schumer: Latest flying objects shot down were likely balloons". BBC News. Archived from the original on February 12, 2023. Retrieved February 12, 2023.
The US believes that the flying objects shot down over North American airspace on Friday and Saturday were balloons, according to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer.
- ^ Liebermann, Oren; Atwood, Kylie (February 12, 2023). "US military shoots down high-altitude object over Lake Huron on Sunday". CNN. Archived from the original on February 13, 2023. Retrieved February 12, 2023.
- ^ Brook, Tom Vanden. "Another object shot down over Lake Huron in Michigan". USA Today. Archived from the original on February 14, 2023. Retrieved February 14, 2023.
- ^ Viswanatha, Nancy A. Youssef and Aruna. "Pentagon Spent At Least $1.5 Million on Missiles to Down Three High-Altitude Objects". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved February 26, 2023.
- ^ Weinberger, Sharon; Vlahou, Toula. "U.S., Canada Abandon Search for Downed Objects". The Wall Street Journal.
- ^ "US and Canada abandon search for three flying objects shot down". BBC News. February 18, 2023. Archived from the original on February 25, 2023.
- ^ Weinberger, Sharon; Vlahou, Toula (February 18, 2023). "U.S., Canada Abandon Search for Downed Objects". The Wall Street Journal.
- 2023 in Alaska
- 2023 in British Columbia
- 2023 in international relations
- 2023 in military history
- 2023 in Montana
- 2023 in Saskatchewan
- 2023 in South Carolina
- 2023 in Yukon
- 21st-century aircraft shootdown incidents
- 21st-century history of the United States Air Force
- Accidents and incidents involving balloons and airships
- Aerial operations and battles involving the United States
- Airstrikes conducted by the United States
- Canada–China relations
- Biden administration controversies
- China–United States relations
- February 2023 events in Canada
- February 2023 events in the United States
- January 2023 events in the United States