Jump to content

Talk:Nymphaeaceae/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
(No difference)

Revision as of 17:38, 31 March 2023

Archive 1

removed image

The Image:Waterlily1web.jpg was removed. I'm afraid the plant shown on it can't be identified precisely. Therefore, with all its artistic qualities, it doesn't give any new information, since there are already three other images, properly identified and of reasonable quality. Iorsh 06:53, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)

This is a hardy water lily hybrid which looks to me is the hybrid called N. 'James Brydon.' --Dara 03:06, Feb 1, 2005 (UTC)


Is anyone seriously opposed to moving this article to a page called Nymphaeaceae, and having the common names of water lily link there? It'd be nice if the plant taxonomy articles all used a smilar naming convention for their pages--nixie 03:21, 16 Oct 2004 (UTC)

That's would be against the naming convention of Wikipedia and of the Tree of Life Wikiproject. I would stick to the standard, but if you want to debate it, I would find the discussion there. Sorry I can't point you directly to it. --Chinasaur
I don't suppose that it matters anyway since all the plants in the family are called water-lillies--nixie 21:33, 16 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Similar discussion has been dragging along with orchids, without much of a definitive resolution. Only a few families actually match up with a common name, so it doesn't come up often. I'd say to leave it at common name, people who look at lists of families will know what is going on, while nonspecialists seeing this article for the first time would be mystified by getting redirected to an "aceae". Stan 22:26, 16 Oct 2004 (UTC)