Talk:Plastic recycling/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
OneClickArchiver creating Section Cleanup |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
I tried to fix the external links section heading just now but cannot determine if the link pointing to http://www.3d-pim.eu/ was supposed to be a reference or a new additional link (in which case it ought to have been below the header line). [[User:Ph7five|- phi]] ([[User talk:Ph7five|talk]]) 20:28, 26 February 2014 (UTC) |
I tried to fix the external links section heading just now but cannot determine if the link pointing to http://www.3d-pim.eu/ was supposed to be a reference or a new additional link (in which case it ought to have been below the header line). [[User:Ph7five|- phi]] ([[User talk:Ph7five|talk]]) 20:28, 26 February 2014 (UTC) |
||
{{Clear}} |
|||
== Expansion request == |
|||
Not very much is said about how plastic is successfully recycled, or what it is recycled into. The current version makes it sound like it is too hard to do at all. -- [[User:Beland|Beland]] 20:08, 24 September 2006 (UTC) |
|||
This section needs a lot more information. It has very outdated information on current techniques. It should also include more information on what more countries around the world are doing about recycling plastic. |
|||
Begin of talk from Sam Tomato: The preceding paragraph is not signed and I did not write it. I think this article is a good example of a bunch of technical talk that most people do not understand or need and not much about what most people really need and want. It would help to make it more clear what can be recycled. Also, the various plastics can be categorized in terms of what is designated as '''reusable''' (not the same as '''recyclable'''). [[User:Sam Tomato|Sam Tomato]] ([[User talk:Sam Tomato|talk]]) 02:36, 21 December 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 23:36, 8 May 2023
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Section Cleanup
The "Financial justification" section seems very muddled and out of place. Further, the source it cites seems to be hand-written ("distric" was likely meant to be "district") and the title "Waste distric raises recycling fees" seems to present the opposite conclusion of that made by the section (that recycling became cheaper). Could someone check this out? 98.176.236.30 (talk) 01:33, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
=="But in today’s new eco-friendly world there has been more of a demand for “green” products."
that phrase just doesn't sound very encyclopedic to me 67.204.6.114 (talk) 04:16, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
I tried to fix the external links section heading just now but cannot determine if the link pointing to http://www.3d-pim.eu/ was supposed to be a reference or a new additional link (in which case it ought to have been below the header line). - phi (talk) 20:28, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Expansion request
Not very much is said about how plastic is successfully recycled, or what it is recycled into. The current version makes it sound like it is too hard to do at all. -- Beland 20:08, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
This section needs a lot more information. It has very outdated information on current techniques. It should also include more information on what more countries around the world are doing about recycling plastic.
Begin of talk from Sam Tomato: The preceding paragraph is not signed and I did not write it. I think this article is a good example of a bunch of technical talk that most people do not understand or need and not much about what most people really need and want. It would help to make it more clear what can be recycled. Also, the various plastics can be categorized in terms of what is designated as reusable (not the same as recyclable). Sam Tomato (talk) 02:36, 21 December 2013 (UTC)