Jump to content

Naval ram: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Ancient rams: re need to reverse
→‎Steam rams: added re sail
Line 14: Line 14:


Many other historical vessels were used as rams, such as the [[Korea]]n [[Turtle ship]].
Many other historical vessels were used as rams, such as the [[Korea]]n [[Turtle ship]].

==Abandonment of the ram==
[[File]]
When naval vessels grew to depend on cannon for fighting and sails for propulsion, the ram became obsolete. Not only did gunfire allow ships to be sunk or disabled (often) at a distance, but sailing vessels do not stop and back up well. In the Age of Sail, only a few interntional rammings were reported, usually of vessels enough smaller than the ramming vessels that the rammed vessels would be broken in two by the impact, allowing the ramming ship to continue in the same direction as before.


==Steam rams==
==Steam rams==

Revision as of 17:58, 11 October 2010

Metal naval ram ("Athlit ram") of a Hellenistic war galley

A naval ram was a weapon carried by varied types of ships, dating back to antiquity. The weapon consisted of an underwater prolongation of the bow of the ship to form an armoured beak, usually between six and twelve feet (2–4 m) in length. This would be driven into the hull of an enemy ship in order to puncture the hull and sink, or at least disable, that ship.

Ancient rams

Ram of Olympias, a reconstruction of an ancient Athenian trireme.

The ram was a naval weapon in the Greek/Roman antiquity and was used in such naval battles as Salamis[1] and Actium. Naval warfare in the Mediterranean rarely used sails, and the use of naval rams specifically required oarsmen over sails in order to maneuver with accuracy and speed, and particularly to reverse the movement of a ramming ship to disentangle it from its sinking victim, lest it be pulled down when its victim sank. The Athenians were especially known for their diekplus and periplus tactics that disabled enemy ships with speed and ramming techniques.[2]

The history of the naval rams in antiquity begins with their arrival and use at the Battle of Salamis in 480 BCE. The evidence available to suggest an earlier date for the first appearance of the naval ram relies on stylized images found on Greek pottery and jewelry, as well as somewhat ambiguous Assyrian reliefs and paintings.[3] Stronger evidence exists that the naval ram most likely evolved from cutwaters, structures designed to support the keel-stem joint and allow for greater speed and dynamism in the water.[4] Naval rams required incredible force and manpower, two requirements that most likely hindered the use of the ram until the rise of the Athenian fleet. However, ancient shipbuilding eventually grew to include pegged mortise and tenon construction, heavier designs, and a wineglass shaped hull, which allowed for the strength and sturdiness necessary for a ram to be effective in battle without the danger of twisting off. There is also evidence to suggest that cutwaters were sheathed in thin metal as well, which correlates to the metal casings on rams, specifically bronze. All of the factors point to a Greek invention of the naval ram, and credit must also be given for their pioneering use of it against the Persians in the Battle of Salamis.[5]

The Athlit ram found off of the coast of Israel is the best example of naval rams discovered to this day. It is thought to be one of the main weapons of the Athenian trireme, and its construction implies advanced technology developed over long periods of time. The ram is special because heavy timbers were shaped and attached to the hull, and then a bronze case was created to fit around the timbers for added strength. The evidence for this lies with the bits of timber found still inside when the Athlit ram was discovered. The blunt edge of the ram and the patterned protrusion would have been enough to disable a rigid ship and disperse the force of the impact on the attacking ship to prevent the twisting off of the ram or damage to the ship itself.[6] The Athlit Ram consists of a unitary bronze casting weighing 465 kg,[7] and measuring 226 cm long with a maximum width of 76 cm, and a maximum height of 96 cm. The bronze that makes up the shell is a high quality alloy containing 9.78% tin with traces of lead and other elements. The shell was cast as a single piece to fit the timbers it protects perfectly[8]. This must have been a difficult endeavor without the technical equipment we have now. The ram can be separated into three parts, the driving center, the bottom plate, and the cowl. The driving center is 30 cm long and 76 cm wide[9]. This is the area of the ram that makes contact with enemy vessels in battle. The front wall of the head of the ram has the thickest layer of casting at 6.8 cm for extra protection during battle. The surface of the ram was decorated with several symbols[10]. On each side, an eagle head, a helmet, and an eight point star. These symbols are similar in dimension, but contain many inconsistencies with each other, suggesting that they were made from the same mold[9]. The ram has a handle depicting a tri-form thunderbolt[9]. It is attached with mortis and tenon joints pegged with 15 mm oak pegs. The wales and the ramming timber are made to interlock for extra strength. The bottom of the ram features a mortis cut into the ramming timber to fit the most forward end of the keel which has been formed into a four centimeter thick and ten centimeter long tenon[10]. The ramming face is flat, so the ram can disengage contact easily and without being pulled or twisted off.

Many other historical vessels were used as rams, such as the Korean Turtle ship.

Abandonment of the ram

File When naval vessels grew to depend on cannon for fighting and sails for propulsion, the ram became obsolete. Not only did gunfire allow ships to be sunk or disabled (often) at a distance, but sailing vessels do not stop and back up well. In the Age of Sail, only a few interntional rammings were reported, usually of vessels enough smaller than the ramming vessels that the rammed vessels would be broken in two by the impact, allowing the ramming ship to continue in the same direction as before.

Steam rams

USS General Price, a Union ram and gunboat, near Baton Rouge, LA, January 18, 1864

In more modern examples, many 19th Century ironclad battleships were equipped with rams. The speed, power, and maneuverability allowed by steam propulsion again raised the idea of using the ship's hull as a weapon. As early as 1840, the French admiral Nicolas-Hippolyte Labrousse proposed building a ram steamship, and by 1860, Dupuy de Lôme had designed an ironclad with a ram.[11] The quick success[12] of the CSS Virginia's ramming attack on the USS Cumberland at the Battle of Hampton Roads in 1862 attracted much attention and caused many navies to re-think the ram. The first coastal battleship, France's Taureau, was built in 1863 for the purpose of attacking warships at anchor or in narrow straits, and was armed with a ram.[13] Many ironclad ships were designed specifically to ram opponents, such as the General Price, pictured to the right. In ships of this type, the armour belt was prolonged to brace both sides of the ram to increase structural integrity.

The theory behind the revival of the weapon derived from the fact that, in the period around 1860, armour held superiority over the ship-mounted cannon. It was believed that an armoured warship could not be seriously damaged by the naval artillery in existence at the time. In order to achieve a decisive result in a naval engagement, therefore, alternative methods of action were believed to be necessary. As it followed, from the same belief, that a ship armed with a ram could not be seriously damaged by the gunfire of its intended victim, the ram became, for a brief period, the main armament of many battleships. It was observed that the guns placed on the Taureau were there "with the sole function of preparing the way for the ram."[14]

The frequent use of ramming as a tactic in the Battle of Lissa (1866) and, to a lesser extent, at the Battle of Iquique also led to many late nineteenth century naval designers equipping their warships with ram bows. This only really aggravated a number of incidents of ships being sunk by their squadron-mates in accidental collisions as ramming never featured as a viable battle tactic again. The fixation on ramming may also have inhibited the development of gunnery.

When it became clear, towards the end of the nineteenth century, that breech-loading cannon could hit, and hit effectively, enemy ships at several thousand yards range, the ineffectiveness of the ram became clear and ships ceased to be fitted with them.

The radical Confederate steam ram CSS Manassas.

No other ironclad was ever sunk by an enemy ship in time of war by the use of the ram, although the ram was regarded by all major navies for some thirty years as primary battleship armament. A number of ships were, however, rammed in peacetime by ships of their own navy. The most serious in terms of loss of life was the collision between HMS Victoria and HMS Camperdown, which took place in the Mediterranean in 1893. The only battleship over submarine victory in history occurred during World War I, when the battleship HMS Dreadnought rammed and sank a German U-Boat, but Dreadnought's bow was not intended for ramming enemy vessels. Numerous incidents of Destroyers ramming and sinking German U-boats which had been earlier forced to the surface by depth charges or gunfire occurred during the Second World War.

Torpedo ram

HMS Polyphemus's ram.

The torpedo ram was a hybrid torpedo boat combining a ram with torpedo tubes. Incorporating design elements from the cruiser and the monitor, it was intended to provide a small and inexpensive weapon systems for coastal defence and other littoral combat.

Like monitors, torpedo rams operated with very little freeboard, sometimes with only inches of hull rising above the water, exposing only their funnels and turrets to enemy fire. In addition to the guns in their turrets, they were also equipped with torpedoes. Early designs incorporated a spar torpedo that could be extended from the bow and detonated by ramming a target. Later designs used tube-launched self-propelled torpedoes, but retained the concept of ramming, resulting in designs like HMS Polyphemus, which had five torpedo tubes, two each port and starboard and one mounted in the centre of her reinforced ram bow.

Civilian use

Originally the Seattle fireboat Duwamish was built with a 'ram' bow.

Naval rams have also been used on civilian vessels.[15] The Seattle fireboat Duwamish, built in 1909, was designed to ram wooden vessels, as a last resort.

References

  1. ^ Lazenby, J.F. The Defence of Greece 490–479 BC. Aris & Phillips Ltd., 1993 (ISBN 0-85668-591-7); pp. 34-37.
  2. ^ Coates, J., J. Morrison, and N. Rankov. The Athenian Trireme: The History and Reconstruction of an Ancient Greek Warship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000
  3. ^ Casson, L. "The Ancient Mariners: Seafarers and Sea Fighters of the Mediterranean in Ancient Times." Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991; pp. 76-77.
  4. ^ Mark, Samuel. "The Earliest Naval Ram." International Journal of Nautical Archaeology 37:253-272, March 2008.
  5. ^ Casson, L. The Ancient Mariners: Seafarers and Sea Fighters of the Mediterranean in Ancient Times. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991; pp. 76-77
  6. ^ Mark, Samuel. "The Earliest Naval Ram." International Journal of Nautical Archaeology 37:253-272, March 2008
  7. ^ The Athlit Ram, Avshalom Zemer, Haifa Museum. http://www.hms.org.il/Museum/Templates/showpage.asp?DBID=1&LNGID=1&TMID=84&FID=1196&PID=2949
  8. ^ Mark, S. 2008. “The Earliest Naval Ram” The International Journal of Nautical Archaeology 35: 261-4
  9. ^ a b c Oron, A. 2001. “The Athlit Ram: Classical and Hellenistic Bronze Casting Technology.” MA. Thesis, Texas A&M University
  10. ^ a b Casson, L., J. Steffy, E. Linder. 1991. The Athlit Ram. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
  11. ^ Ropp, Theodore, and Stephen S. Roberts. The Development of a Modern Navy: French Naval Policy, 1871-1904. Naval Institute Press, 1987; p. 12.
  12. ^ The Cumberland sank so quickly that it almost brought the Virginia down as well.
  13. ^ Ropp and Roberts, p. 13; Hore, Peter: The Ironclads, page 38. Anness Publishing Ltd, 2006. ISBN 978-1-84476-299-6.
  14. ^ Ropp, Theodore, and Stephen S. Roberts. The Development of a Modern Navy: French Naval Policy, 1871-1904. Naval Institute Press, 1987; p. 13.
  15. ^ James Delgado (1988). "Duwamish Fireboat: National Historic Landmark Study". National Park Service. Archived from the original on 2009-12-29.

See also