Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avatar Meher Baba Trust: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Creating deletion discussion page for Avatar Meher Baba Trust. (TW)
 
ce
Line 4: Line 4:
:{{la|Avatar Meher Baba Trust}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avatar Meher Baba Trust|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 May 8#{{anchorencode:Avatar Meher Baba Trust}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Avatar_Meher_Baba_Trust Stats]</span>)
:{{la|Avatar Meher Baba Trust}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avatar Meher Baba Trust|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 May 8#{{anchorencode:Avatar Meher Baba Trust}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Avatar_Meher_Baba_Trust Stats]</span>)
:({{Find sources AFD|Avatar Meher Baba Trust}})
:({{Find sources AFD|Avatar Meher Baba Trust}})
Completely non-notable fund. It is hard, at first glance, to see how such a financial instrument could meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines, as, by their nature, they tend towards the micro and the confidential. This fund has made insufficient impact culturally ''in its own right'' to have garnered the necessary [[WP:DEPTH|in-depth]] or [[WP:PERSISTENCE|persistence of coverage]] in [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] to warrant inclusion. Regardless of the creator—and the wishes of the creator—this has no impact on [[WP:ORGSIN]] or [[WP:ORGIN]]. The topic has received minimal coverage, except for trivial mentions, [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22vatar+Meher+Baba+Perpetual+Public+Charitable+Trust+%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b generally]. It has received ''even less'' (by a massive margin'' in the far more stringent [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22avatar+Meher+Baba+Perpetual+Public+Charitable+Trust+%22&client=firefox-b&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjW_5Sv__XaAhXHQ8AKHYjhA4YQ_AUICigB&biw=1760&bih=886 news reportage]. Suffice, then of course to say, that the [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22avatar+Meher+Baba+Perpetual+Public+Charitable+Trust+%22&client=firefox-b&tbm=bks&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiipZT2gPbaAhWkBcAKHb_0BgwQ_AUIECgB&biw=1760&bih=886&dpr=1.09 literature] (with the exception of dedications, listed mentions, and [[WP:SPS]]) is equally sparse. Ultimately, there in insufficient coverage for the Trust to pass the very basic requirements of [[WP:ORGCRIT]]. [[User:Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:dark blue">'''—SerialNumber54129'''</span>]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:red">''' paranoia /'''</span>]][[User talk:Serial Number 54129|'''cheap shit room''']]</sup> 11:30, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Completely non-notable fund. It is hard, at first glance, to see how such a financial instrument could meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines, as, by their nature, they tend towards the micro and the confidential. This fund has made insufficient impact culturally ''in its own right'' to have garnered the necessary [[WP:DEPTH|in-depth]] or [[WP:PERSISTENCE|persistence of coverage]] in [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] to warrant inclusion. Regardless of the creator—and the wishes of the creator—this has no impact on [[WP:ORGSIG]] or [[WP:INHERITORG]]. The topic has received minimal coverage, except for trivial mentions, [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22vatar+Meher+Baba+Perpetual+Public+Charitable+Trust+%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b generally]. It has received ''even less'' (by a massive margin) in the far more stringent [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22avatar+Meher+Baba+Perpetual+Public+Charitable+Trust+%22&client=firefox-b&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjW_5Sv__XaAhXHQ8AKHYjhA4YQ_AUICigB&biw=1760&bih=886 news reportage]. Suffice, then of course to say, that the [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22avatar+Meher+Baba+Perpetual+Public+Charitable+Trust+%22&client=firefox-b&tbm=bks&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiipZT2gPbaAhWkBcAKHb_0BgwQ_AUIECgB&biw=1760&bih=886&dpr=1.09 literature] (with the exception of dedications, listed mentions, and [[WP:SPS]]) is equally sparse. Ultimately, there in insufficient coverage for the Trust to pass the very basic requirements of [[WP:ORGCRIT]]. [[User:Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:dark blue">'''—SerialNumber54129'''</span>]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:red">''' paranoia /'''</span>]][[User talk:Serial Number 54129|'''cheap shit room''']]</sup> 11:30, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:31, 8 May 2018

Avatar Meher Baba Trust (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely non-notable fund. It is hard, at first glance, to see how such a financial instrument could meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines, as, by their nature, they tend towards the micro and the confidential. This fund has made insufficient impact culturally in its own right to have garnered the necessary in-depth or persistence of coverage in reliable sources to warrant inclusion. Regardless of the creator—and the wishes of the creator—this has no impact on WP:ORGSIG or WP:INHERITORG. The topic has received minimal coverage, except for trivial mentions, generally. It has received even less (by a massive margin) in the far more stringent news reportage. Suffice, then of course to say, that the literature (with the exception of dedications, listed mentions, and WP:SPS) is equally sparse. Ultimately, there in insufficient coverage for the Trust to pass the very basic requirements of WP:ORGCRIT. —SerialNumber54129 paranoia /cheap shit room 11:30, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]